Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] siptrace flag fixes (#2273)

2020-04-06 Thread Federico Cabiddu
Merged #2273 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2273#event-3205599272___ Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing Lis

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] siptrace flag fixes (#2273)

2020-04-06 Thread Federico Cabiddu
Agree that such functions could be very useful in cases like this one. Should I backport to 5.3? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2273#issuecomment-609823372___

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] siptrace flag fixes (#2273)

2020-04-06 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
You can go ahead and merge it. I am thinking that it could make sense to add some dedicated functions to the TM module and TM API to get only the needed fields from a transaction, not to have to backup active transaction, lookup the one we need for checking and then restoring to the old one, as