I merged it, going to update some parts. Thanks!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3347#issuecomment-1549470511
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Merged #3347 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3347#event-9256823980
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Kamailio (SER) - Developme
> Topoh does not use call-id value for finding records, like it is done by
> topos. I will have to go deeper in the code to review properly and be sure it
> works as expected. There are some tricks that a partial change can be
> discovered, but I am not sure that it applies to call-id.
when lum
Topoh does not use call-id value for finding records, like it is done by topos.
I will have to go deeper in the code to review properly and be sure it works as
expected. There are some tricks that a partial change can be discovered, but I
am not sure that it applies to call-id.
--
Reply to thi
> The lump operations do not change the Call-Id immediately, I have to think
> about what could be a good solution, eventually applying changes as an
> intermediary step or do a custom in-place replacement of Call-Id.
Thankyou, However The same methord of lump operation is ued in Topoh and this
The lump operations do not change the Call-Id immediately, I have to think
about what could be a good solution, eventually applying changes as an
intermediary step or do a custom in-place replacement of Call-Id.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/k
