Re: [sr-dev] appending a new branch in route block

2010-05-17 Thread Juha Heinanen
Juha Heinanen writes: > any pointer on how to do the same from lcr module? i guess i need to > load tm api and call some tm function? i think i was able to figure this out. the corresponding tm api function is t_gett(). so i went and changed next_gw() implementation so that if no transaction e

[sr-dev] [tracker] Assignee added: SDP parsing when dealing with multi-part bodies

2010-05-17 Thread sip-router
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A user has added themself to the list of users assigned to this task. FS#73 - SDP parsing when dealing with multi-part bodies User who did this - Pascal Maugeri (pmaugeri) http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=73 You are receivin

[sr-dev] [tracker] Task opened: SDP parsing when dealing with multi-part bodies

2010-05-17 Thread sip-router
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below. User who did this - Pascal Maugeri (pmaugeri) Attached to Project - sip-router Summary - SDP parsing when dealing with multi-part bodies Task Type - Bug Report Category - Core Status - Assign

Re: [sr-dev] git:master: pkg: updated kamailio spec file for CentOS

2010-05-17 Thread Ovidiu Sas
I think those files are generated during the rpm build precess during: + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile Can you check if you have the python rpm installed? Thanks, Ovidiu On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > the specs installs dbtextdb.pyc and dbtextdb.pyo fil

Re: [sr-dev] appending a new branch in route block

2010-05-17 Thread Juha Heinanen
daniel, when i implemented serial forking next_contacts() function as part of tm module, i was able to simply do struct cell *t; t = get_t(); and then find out with test if (!t || (t == T_UNDEFINED)) { if transaction exists. any pointer on how to do the same from lcr module? i guess

[sr-dev] [tracker] Task opened: allow rewriting request uri also in failure route

2010-05-17 Thread sip-router
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A new Flyspray task has been opened. Details are below. User who did this - Juha Heinanen (jh) Attached to Project - sip-router Summary - allow rewriting request uri also in failure route Task Type - Improvement Category - Core Status - Assigned A

[sr-dev] [tracker] Assignee added: allow rewriting request uri also in failure route

2010-05-17 Thread sip-router
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY. A user has added themself to the list of users assigned to this task. FS#72 - allow rewriting request uri also in failure route User who did this - Juha Heinanen (jh) http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=72 You are receiving thi

Re: [sr-dev] appending a new branch in route block

2010-05-17 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > is a second call of next_gw() in route block always appending a branch? > or is updating the r-uri/dst-uri? daniel, second and later invocations of next_gw() always append a branch, which now has turned out to be wrong. > In this case when t_relay failed, tra

Re: [sr-dev] appending a new branch in route block

2010-05-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 5/17/10 7:49 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Juha Heinanen writes: another strange thing is, why the branch route is executed only once (for the first t_relay) although the script is calling t_relay() two times and t_on_branch() is called before each call? this was my mistake in

Re: [sr-dev] git:master: pkg: updated kamailio spec file for CentOS

2010-05-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
the specs installs dbtextdb.pyc and dbtextdb.pyo files for kamctl, but when I tried to generate rpms on centos 5.5, these files were not found. How they are generated (since source tree does not include them) or can they be ommitted? Cheers, Daniel On 3/31/10 8:07 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote: Modul