On 4/6/13 8:44 PM, Hugh Waite wrote:
Hi,
On 06/04/2013 11:44, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
This branch-failure route has been implemented as an event route
after discussion with Daniel. (See
http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2013-March/019191.html).
As a result, you cannot specify m
See my and Daniel's response to Olle's query. I did not realise this was
possible for event_routes and I'll try to add this back in as soon as I can.
Hugh
On 06/04/2013 06:04, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Hugh Waite writes:
These changes add a new event route [tm:branch-failure] to the tm module
whi
Hi,
On 06/04/2013 11:44, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
This branch-failure route has been implemented as an event route after
discussion with Daniel. (See
http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2013-March/019191.html).
As a result, you cannot specify multiple named routes and enable them
Hi!
I just tested and noticed that SNMPstats doesn't list any IPv6 interfaces we
listen to. The OID seems to contain the IPv4 address, which doesn't really make
sense in IPv6 and the code (using lib/kcore/statistics.h) assumes an IP address
is four bytes long. I will have to google around to fi
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 0f4168e0e6b53c8993121f7a751cabecc2d3e1f3
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=0f4168e0e6b53c8993121f7a751cabecc2d3e1f3
Author: Olle E. Johansson
Committer: Olle E. Johansson
Date: Sat Apr 6 14:51:59 2013 +0200
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: a56a0e32a329ec05a6bb33713b120a949a0cf04b
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=a56a0e32a329ec05a6bb33713b120a949a0cf04b
Author: Olle E. Johansson
Committer: Olle E. Johansson
Date: Sat Apr 6 14:59:19 2013 +0200
Hi,
> A table lock might be OK, but probably far less efficient than row locks.
> There is also the possibility of there being some deadlocks in the
> presence code if entire table locks are used - I can't say whether this is
> likely or not as I haven't taken a critical look at the code with that
On 4/6/13 12:32 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Hugh Waite writes:
The usrloc tables are indexed on the hash of the AoR, so one is needed
to find the correct entry.
ok, but why cannot a new index on ruid field be created in which case
unregister would not need uri (aor) or use argument at all?
keepin
Hello,
On 4/5/13 5:34 PM, Hugh Waite wrote:
Hi Olle,
On 05/04/2013 14:53, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
modules/tm: Added branch_failure event route to tm documentation
Thank you for adding this route!
You're welcome!
Formatting issue: I don't like the event route doc to come after the
module A
Hugh Waite writes:
> The usrloc tables are indexed on the hash of the AoR, so one is needed
> to find the correct entry.
ok, but why cannot a new index on ruid field be created in which case
unregister would not need uri (aor) or use argument at all?
-- juha
___
Hi Juha,
On 06/04/2013 06:39, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Hugh Waite writes:
A new pv $T_reply_ruid is accessible in this route which can be used to
unregister a single contact entry.
since ruid is unique id, why is second argument ($tu in the the example)
needed in unregister call:
This function had
Module: sip-router
Branch: master
Commit: 1eeae38650ce70ade73f7e03fd3be78f1d97e0e5
URL:
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=1eeae38650ce70ade73f7e03fd3be78f1d97e0e5
Author: Torrey Searle
Committer: Torrey Searle
Date: Sat Apr 6 11:59:55 2013 +0200
modules/
12 matches
Mail list logo
