Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sdpops: Parsing of a multipart INVITE body (SDP + an unknown MIME type) (#561)

Hi Daniel, Yes, it works with "isalnum" in my test, but another define, just below: is_char_equal is also using "isalpha" but I don't know if it needs modification: ```C #define is_char_equal(_c_,_cs_) \ ( (isalpha((int)_c_)?(((_c_)|0x20)==(_cs_)):((_c_)==(_cs_)))==1 ) ``` --- You are r

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sdpops: Parsing of a multipart INVITE body (SDP + an unknown MIME type) (#561)

This looks like the condition to match lower and upper case characters, which should apply only to alphabetic characters. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/561#issuec

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] QMalloc: TCP Memory Allocation Failures (#562)

Adding `mem_join=1` to the config also appears to resolve the issue. Is this something that is enabled by default on 4.4? These two links contradict each other: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/troubleshooting/memory https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.4.x/core#mem_join The take-ho

[sr-dev] Dispatcher id's question

Hi list, I was wondering if any work is in progress making dispatcher operate with non-numeric pool id's? Plans or todo's? Or may be some successor to replace dispatcher? -- Best regards, Alekzander Spiridonov ___ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-r

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] QMalloc: TCP Memory Allocation Failures (#562)

Do you have a suggestion of the best `malloc` method to use in a production environment? Some Kamailio blog posts suggest fmalloc is more suited to production? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.

Re: [sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] sdpops: Parsing of a multipart INVITE body (SDP + an unknown MIME type) (#561)

Closed #561. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/561#event-615040164___ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http:

Re: [sr-dev] Dispatcher id's question

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 12:39, Alekzander Spiridonov wrote: > > Hi list, > > I was wondering if any work is in progress making dispatcher operate with > non-numeric pool id's? Plans or todo's? Or may be some successor to replace > dispatcher? Not that I’m aware of. Curious - what would be the

Re: [sr-dev] Dispatcher id's question

No need to map whatever id is to a number. Let's say data is maintained by other sub-systems, so with current implementation either these sub-sys's have to work with digit id's only or K have to have some sort of mapping. Both options are not actually flexible. Although I do understand that use of

Re: [sr-dev] Dispatcher id's question

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 15:22, Alekzander Spiridonov wrote: > > No need to map whatever id is to a number. Let's say data is maintained by > other sub-systems, so with current implementation either these sub-sys's have > to work with digit id's only or K have to have some sort of mapping. > Both

[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] cnxcc: Kamailio crashes with a seg fault at high traffic load (#563)

After a 10 minutes benchmark at 90 CPS Kamailio 4.3.5 crashes. I'm using money based credit control. The log output is as follows: Apr 4 17:42:32 sipserver /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5230]: ALERT: [main.c:728]: handle_sigs(): child process 5431 exited by a signal 11 Apr 4 17:42:32 sipserver /u

[sr-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: kamailiodev-nightly-binaries » amd64,trusty,slave #489

See -- [...truncated 348 lines...] + '[' -n '' ']' + '[' amd64 = amd64 ']' + DEBOOTSTRAP=debootstrap + return 0 + '[' -z '' ']' + REPREPR

[sr-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: kamailiodev-nightly-binaries » i386,trusty,slave #489

See -- [...truncated 351 lines...] + case "$HOST_ARCH" in + '[' i386 = i386 ']' + DEBOOTSTRAP=debootstrap + return 0 + '[' -z '' ']' + REP