Attached is the pcap from latest nightly.
As you can see (frame 21) the ACK is incorrect, I believe it should specify
all the hops from the 200OK (frame 16) so that the hop by hop ACK can be
routed via the proxy chain.
topoh module works fine.
Pete
On 26 April 2017 at 05:18, Sergey Basov wrote
You give to us very hard callflow...
Without any pauses between responces..
Some requests go through 127.0.0.1... But responces from 127.0.0.1 not present.
There are peers from which invites not present in dump. I can not see
ful path of the initial Invite, but there is responses.
I will send d
As I could notice upon a quick look, there seems to be two calls -- two
INVITE requests having same call id but different cseq. Can you confirm
this is the case? Because the capture doesn't seem to have all the
incoming/outgoing messages, some are missing.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26.04.17 12:59, Sergey
Ah I see why it is confusing
This setup maintains a Call-ID through an SBC downstream, so the INVITE's
you see have the same Call-ID but they have a different fromtag/cseq,
Wireshark shows them all as one call which is annoying when looking at the
viewer!
If you check the first call only between
Hi All.
I have just try to test topos with GW which requires PRACK.
As you can see UA at packet 21 send PRACK to topos contact, but after
topos, on other kamailio side in PRACK request line present not
kontact but record-route header.
Can you fix it?
Thank you.
--
Best regards,
Sergey Basov
Hello,
On 26.04.17 14:53, Sergey Basov wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I have just try to test topos with GW which requires PRACK.
>
> As you can see UA at packet 21 send PRACK to topos contact, but after
> topos, on other kamailio side in PRACK request line present not
> kontact but record-route header.
>
Can you paste here the from tag or cseq for the dialog you are referring
to? Because the number of frames are not matching my pcap viewer.
Send also the db dump, they should reveal if something is broken there.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26.04.17 14:46, Pete Kelly wrote:
> Ah I see why it is confusing
>
Thanks for workaround.
But I will wait for you solution )
I ready for testing )
Thank you Daniel for your work!
--
Best regards,
Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.ba...@gmail.com
2017-04-26 16:57 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
> Hello,
>
>
> On 26.04.17 14:53, Sergey Bas
Hi Daniel
It's CSeq 1, fromtag A1
DB attached
On 26 April 2017 at 15:03, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Can you paste here the from tag or cseq for the dialog you are referring
> to? Because the number of frames are not matching my pcap viewer.
>
> Send also the db dump, they should reveal
Hi guys,
I'm trying to access dialog vars in failure_route with no success. Dialog
exists but vars are null and I'can modify them either. Is there any
restriction?
if ($dlg_var(v1) == 0){
$dlg_var(v1) = "1";
if (is_known_dlg()){
xlog("L_NOTICE",
Hi guys,
I'm trying to access dialog vars in failure_route with no success. Dialog
exists but vars are null and I'can modify them *neither*. Is there any
restriction?
if ($dlg_var(v1) == 0){
$dlg_var(v1) = "1";
if (is_known_dlg()){
xlog("L_NOTIC
Sorry...
Dialog exists but vars are null and *I can't* modify them *neither*. Is
there any restriction?
2017-04-26 12:41 GMT-03:00 Diego Nadares :
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to access dialog vars in failure_route with no success. Dialog
> exists but vars are null and I'can modify them *neither*.
Perhaps someone knows the rationale behind behavior of forward() that I find
odd.
For example:
ds_select_domain();
forward();
subst('/(To: .*)/To: bla\n/g');
forward();
subst('/(To: .*)/To: bla\n/g');
forward();
subst('/(To: .*)/To: bla\n/g');
This should result in just a substitution of the To-
I have updated the http_async_client documentation for master and 5.0.
Please note that in respect to 4.4 http_async_query() now only takes 2
parameters: the payload is passed with $http_req(body).
Giacomo
On 25 April 2017 at 22:09, Giacomo Vacca wrote:
> Hi,
> reusing the same connection to t
Hello.
I'm running Kamailio 4.3.5 on Ubuntu Server 14.04.
I just started using the app_python module together with the OpenTok Python
SDK, described here:
https://tokbox.com/developer/sdks/python/
My basic Python test script works fine, but when I add an import statement in
the Python script
Hello,
On 27.04.17 04:18, Cody Herzog wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
>
>
> I'm running Kamailio 4.3.5 on Ubuntu Server 14.04.
>
>
>
> I just started using the app_python module together with the OpenTok
> Python SDK, described here:
>
>
>
> https://tokbox.com/developer/sdks/python/
>
>
>
> My basic
16 matches
Mail list logo
