Re: [SR-Users] UAC reg_random_delay issue

2017-08-15 Thread Ivo Vastert
Hi, We are currently using 60: modparam("uac", "reg_random_delay", 60) On Tuesday, August 15, 2017, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > what is the value for reg_timer_interval parameter? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 15.08.17 12:54, Ivo Vastert wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: [SR-Users] Siremis Install: Unable to write in the session save path (CentOS 6)

2017-08-15 Thread Trent
Thank you kindly for the quick response. I had no idea Kamailio was afflicted as is Asterisk when dealing with SELinux From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Yu Boot Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 4:43 PM To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org Subject: Re:

Re: [SR-Users] Siremis Install: Unable to write in the session save path (CentOS 6)

2017-08-15 Thread Yu Boot
use following command: chcon -t httpd_sys_content_t /var/www/html -R or just disable SELinux globally 16.08.2017 0:34, Trent пишет: Full error: Unable to write in the session save path [/var/www/html/siremis/session]Unable to write in the session save path

[SR-Users] Siremis Install: Unable to write in the session save path (CentOS 6)

2017-08-15 Thread Trent
Hello. Doing a new install, and I am in the stage of accessing the web interface for Sermis which is located at /var/www/html/siremis Full error: Unable to write in the session save path [/var/www/html/siremis/session]Unable to write in the session save path

Re: [SR-Users] UAC reg_random_delay issue

2017-08-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, what is the value for reg_timer_interval parameter? Cheers, Daniel On 15.08.17 12:54, Ivo Vastert wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the UAC module in Kamailio to setup about 500 outbound > registration towards a single host. > The issue I'm currently experiencing is that when we start Kamailio

[SR-Users] UAC random_delay not that random

2017-08-15 Thread Ivo Vastert
Hi, I'm using the UAC module in Kamailio to setup about 500 outbound registration towards a single host. The issue I'm currently experiencing is that when we start Kamailio all this 500 registrations are initiated at once towards the host which can't handle all the requests at the same time.

Re: [SR-Users] KSR.pv.get("$(hdr(P-Asserted-Identity){uri.user})") returns unable to get pv value

2017-08-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the value for $hdr(P-Asserted-Identity) is not a SIP URI, bit a To-body like format, so you have to use {tobody.user} instead of {uri.user}. Or use $ai instead of $hdr(...) with the uri transformation. Cheers, Daniel On 15.08.17 11:20, Muhammad Zaka wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > >

Re: [SR-Users] KSR.pv.get("$(hdr(P-Asserted-Identity){uri.user})") returns unable to get pv value

2017-08-15 Thread Muhammad Zaka
Hi Daniel, Please find the following log messages with debug=3: - Aug 15 10:12:21 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[32263]: PYT {INVITE}: DEBUG: app_python [apy_kemi.c:623]: sr_apy_kemi_f_pv_get(): pv get: $ai Aug 15 10:12:21 sbc99-kam-dev /usr/sbin/kamailio[32263]: PYT {INVITE}: DEBUG:

Re: [SR-Users] KSR.pv.get("$(hdr(P-Asserted-Identity){uri.user})") returns unable to get pv value

2017-08-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you run with debug=3 in kamailio.cfg and send all log messages? Cheers, Daniel On 15.08.17 10:43, Muhammad Zaka wrote: > > Hi > > > > We are experiencing issue with python script KSR.pv.get using branch > 5.0.2 as it fails “unable to get pv value” > > > > Example Code: > > if

[SR-Users] KSR.pv.get("$(hdr(P-Asserted-Identity){uri.user})") returns unable to get pv value

2017-08-15 Thread Muhammad Zaka
Hi We are experiencing issue with python script KSR.pv.get using branch 5.0.2 as it fails "unable to get pv value" Example Code: if KSR.pv.get("$ai"): fromid = KSR.pv.get("$(hdr(P-Asserted-Identity){uri.user})") Error: Aug 14 18:38:23 sbc99-kam-dev

Re: [SR-Users] Fix missing Via with t_reply()

2017-08-15 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 14.08.17 14:30, Mikko Lehto wrote: > 2016-03-18 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> My guess that the sbc_5 is so poor implemented that it takes the Via >> from last request, which is CANCEL, but CANCEL is a hop-by-hop request >> in this case. If my guess is

Re: [SR-Users] [Solved] Re: Reinvite, rewrite reply SDP?

2017-08-15 Thread Sebastian Damm
Hi, On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Yu Boot wrote: > Problem was that SDPs in reinvite sequence have already "nortpproxy=yes" > flag set (from initial INVITE transaction I think), and SDP rewriting just > don't triggers when it should. Oh, I've seen that before. User Agents