Hi,
How to give username and password for the gateway in params column in
lcr_gw?
Regards,
Ashutosh
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Ashutosh chaubey writes:
> How to give username and password for the gateway in params column in
> lcr_gw?
It is up to you. params column value of a gw just specifies the
params that are added to Request-URI when INVITE request is sent to the
gw.
-- Juha
___
For some reason, Voicemail Notify messages coming from Asterisk Boxes - are not
forwarded to the SIP Extensions by Kamailio.
This is the SIP Packet coming to the Kamailio:
2018/08/28 10:59:19.165644 1.1.1.1:5060 -> 2.2.2.2:5060
NOTIFY
sip:11@3.3.3.3:21755;rinstance=e6369e13becab3ef;transport=tc
Hello,
I am using Kamailio as a SIP proxy.So it receives SIP packet from internet
and forwards it to FS servers in local network.When i execute "ss" command
i see very high value in RECV-Q column.I THINK IT IS NOT NORMAL.PLEASE
CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG.
No, this is not normal. But you almost certainly have some external I/O
operation which is blocking the worker thread. There isn't much explanation
otherwise.
This article (disclaimer: I wrote it) may help:
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/tuning-kamailio-for-high-throughput-and-performance/
--
Maybe it is time to look at ZTE traces/logs.
P.S.
Try to check in docs meaning of X-ZTE-Cause
On 08/27/2018 04:06 PM, Mojtaba wrote:
Hi, I knew, But i have not access to ZTE's pcscf.
Thank you.
But what about my question?Why the UE could not register via SEMS?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:40 Ivailo
Hi Joel
the Via's and Record routes is due to IMS structure, but it doesn't affect
the concept as i test it with a normal sip Proxy
Proxy IP : 94.252.181.93 : 5050
RTP Engine : 94.252.181.49
I-cscf : 10.192.129.134
s-cscf :10.192.129.134
Actually i'm using what Mr Carsten introduce for IMS
On M
Hi,
Is there any other explanation contextually, in the logs, besides this
error? Could it be, for example, that t_relay() cannot resolve the
next-hop destination, or that a listener is not available to match that
routing destination or outgoing transport?
-- Alex
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 01:26:
Hello,
On 28.08.18 12:42, sagar malam wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Kamailio as a SIP proxy.So it receives SIP packet from
> internet and forwards it to FS servers in local network.When i execute
> "ss" command i see very high value in RECV-Q column.I THINK IT IS NOT
> NORMAL.PLEASE CORRECT ME I
Thanks for prompt response.
Some more information :
We are running it on virtual machine(Xenserver).
Selinux and IPtables are disabled.I will check if VM platform is putting
some limits or not.
Further i have same Kamailio script in another server and i am not facing
this issue there.
OS max UD
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 01:31:04PM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> if you have performance issues just with a very simple config sending
> a stateless sip reply, then check your system/firewall
> configuration/limits. Specially on centos, I have seen a lot of
> restrictive traffic rates l
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:12:01PM +0530, sagar malam wrote:
> Further i have same Kamailio script in another server and i am not
> facing this issue there.
That pretty well points to the problem being caused by the runtime
environment rather than the Kamailio config or anything it does.
--
Ale
Hi,
it's seems not related to CGNAT, but more due to a misconfiguration on
the Proxy-CSCF. It should evaluate the "alias" in the R-URI in order
to send it to the proper address.
Thanks,
Carsten
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Millerntorplatz 1
20359 Hamburg / Germany
http:/
Alex,
I agree but i want to find root cause of this problem.Can you suggest me
what next i need to look at OS level ?
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 5:15 PM Alex Balashov
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:12:01PM +0530, sagar malam wrote:
>
> > Further i have same Kamailio script in another se
Well, I can't really say what limits selinux puts in place or other CentOS
specific apps, but I encountered various strange situations where no centos
sysadmin I interacted with could give a solution, even with selinux
disabled, so could be something else...
Coming in my mind: limit on number of n
Hi All,
I'm facing a strange problem of missing ACC record in case of parallel
call forking.
The scenario is the following:
- A subscriber with 1 device registered
- B subscriber with 2 device registered (B1 and B2)
CASE 1:
- A calls B
- B1 and B2 start ringing
- A hangups the call befor
Hello Carsten :)
Thanks for your reply
Actually, we remove the alias from sip massages for a reason, which was a
bug in the client generating wrong ip in the alias in BYE msgs in Video
Calls only, and even before removing the alias part this problem existed.
under this specific kind of networks,
Am Dienstag, 28. August 2018, 13:52:09 CEST schrieb sagar malam:
> I agree but i want to find root cause of this problem.Can you suggest me
> what next i need to look at OS level ?
Hello Sagar,
as already suggested - I would try to sort out the other variables in this
setup:
- compare the serve
Hello,
if you haven't seen the news article on kamailio.org, today at 17:00GMT
I will be part of the Cluecon Weekly online video conference to present
about what's new lately in Kamailio, plans for the future as well as
address questions about using Kamailio together with FreeSwitch. Anyone
can jo
19 matches
Mail list logo
