Re: [SR-Users] re- double record route

2018-09-16 Thread Mojtaba
Your response confused me, But let me describe some rules. The BYE request is used the record route header in it's INVITE request in Dialogs. Then when UE want to send BYE, It add a all record route in BYE message. On other hand, the SIP stack that UE is used, may be different, So you must be sure

[SR-Users] MWI notification through pua.publish

2018-09-16 Thread Juha Heinanen
willy writes: > Have anyone tried to use pua.publish to send MWI notification? Can it > work at all? > > I'm sending request through jsonrpc server, but it is not dispatched by > handle_publish. It works fine here. Last week I noticed an issue with pua.publish over jsonrpc and it was fixed.

[SR-Users] MWI notification through pua.publish

2018-09-16 Thread willy
Hello. Have anyone tried to use pua.publish to send MWI notification? Can it work at all? I'm sending request through jsonrpc server, but it is not dispatched by handle_publish. Thank you, Kirill ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-use

[SR-Users] double record route from INVITE

2018-09-16 Thread Wilkins, Steve
Hi Mojtaba, But when I send the 'BYE' doesn't the double Record-Route from the 'INVITE' (from IOS) need to be there, so that IOS can find it's Proxies and complete the transaction and send back a '200 OK'? Thank you, ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Ma

Re: [SR-Users] re- double record route

2018-09-16 Thread Wilkins, Steve
Hi Mojtaba, But when I send the 'BYE' doesn't the double Record-Route from the 'INVITE' (from IOS) need to be there, so that IOS can find it's Proxies and complete the transaction and send back a '200 OK'? Thank you, -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Mojtaba Sent: Sunday

Re: [SR-Users] re- double record route

2018-09-16 Thread Mojtaba
What do you mean exactly? Do you mean the INVITE is received from IOS has double record route? If this true, the Kamailio remove all record route when the INVITE request is received by default. In other words, Kamailio remove all record routes form downstream or upstream in INVITE request by defaul

Re: [SR-Users] re- double record route

2018-09-16 Thread Wilkins, Steve
The routes from the 'INVITE' were changed by something. The 'BYE' route does not have the routes from the 'INVITE', I don’t know how they got deleted. -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alex Balashov Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 10:05 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailin

Re: [SR-Users] re- double record route

2018-09-16 Thread Alex Balashov
Route sets need to be fastidiously and scrupulously conserved by both UAs on both sides in all in-dialog requests. On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 01:40:24PM +, Wilkins, Steve wrote: > Hi Henning, > > > > Yes I do have that enabled. What is happening is that one of the providers > on IOS is send

[SR-Users] re- double record route

2018-09-16 Thread Wilkins, Steve
Hi Henning, Yes I do have that enabled. What is happening is that one of the providers on IOS is sending a double record route on the INVITE, but it is getting lost somewhere so when I send a 'BYE', I get a "404 not here". When I look at the SIP message I see only one of the record routes f

Re: [SR-Users] double record route?

2018-09-16 Thread Henning Westerholt
Am Sonntag, 16. September 2018, 14:25:29 CEST schrieb Wilkins, Steve: > Is there any way to add a double record route? I tried adding a second > record route and I always only get the first one added. I have tried > record_route(), and record_route_advertised_address(...), but I still > only g

[SR-Users] double record route?

2018-09-16 Thread Wilkins, Steve
Good Morning All, Is there any way to add a double record route? I tried adding a second record route and I always only get the first one added. I have tried record_route(), and record_route_advertised_address(...), but I still only get the first record route added. Thank you, -Steve _