Re: [SR-Users] kamailio does not responde if an rtpengine is unreachable

2018-12-24 Thread Juha Heinanen
* Paolo Visintin - evosip.cloud writes: > we solved starting with no rtpengine this produces at startup: > WARNING: rtpengine [rtpengine_db.c:100]: rtpp_load_db(): No rtpproxy > instances in database > and then, after rtpengine instances are up and correctly running we send an > `rtpengine.reload`

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio does not responde if an rtpengine is unreachable

2018-12-24 Thread * Paolo Visintin - evosip.cloud
Hello Juha, I think we have experienced the same behaviour (also `service kamailio restart` does strange things like freezed processes and failure of reloading procedure) we solved starting with no rtpengine this produces at startup: WARNING: rtpengine [rtpengine_db.c:100]: rtpp_load_db(): No rtpp

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio does not responde if an rtpengine is unreachable

2018-12-24 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > Can you see the packet being sent over the network (with ngrep, tcpdump, > ...)? Yes, UDP register is sent, but kamailio does not respond to it. Then I did this. 1) Started K where rtpengine udp:192.26.134.10:6050 is enabled but is not running. 2) Gave kamcmd

Re: [SR-Users] Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

2018-12-24 Thread Joel Serrano
+1! Merry Christmas & happy new year! On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 09:51 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > With the season holiday just starting, it's again a good time to express > my thanks and greetings to all the friends, developers and community > members that made 2018 another great year for K

[SR-Users] Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

2018-12-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
With the season holiday just starting, it's again a good time to express my thanks and greetings to all the friends, developers and community members that made 2018 another great year for Kamailio project. Enjoy the holidays! Merry Christmas! Daniel * Santa is flying Kamailio! * -- Daniel-Cons

Re: [SR-Users] app_python3 and kamailio 5.2.0 docker

2018-12-24 Thread Grant Bagdasarian
Great! Thanks Victor! From: sr-users On Behalf Of Victor Seva Sent: maandag 24 december 2018 08:54 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] app_python3 and kamailio 5.2.0 docker On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 at 22:19, Grant Bagdasarian mailto:g...@cm.nl>> wrote: I’ve pulled the K

Re: [SR-Users] failure route is not executed when suspended invite is cancelled

2018-12-24 Thread Koray Vatansever
Hi Daniel, Thanks for your analysis. In failure route, I just save response code in a dlg_var and write this dlg_var into cdr to understand that how the call is ended. Simple event_route execution solves my issue. On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 12:17 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > s

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio does not responde if an rtpengine is unreachable

2018-12-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Can you see the packet being sent over the network (with ngrep, tcpdump, ...)? Maybe you can also send a registration over udp, to see if that works or not. Daniel On 24.12.18 13:55, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >> It waits for packets from the network. Did you send

Re: [SR-Users] Manipulate sip header on an in-dialog negative reply

2018-12-24 Thread Dmitri Savolainen
Hi. I resolved similar situation with modparam("tm", "on_sl_reply", "stateless_replies") . onreply_route["stateless_replies"] { # do not allow stateless replies to be forwarded return 0; } On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 23:31, Olli Attila wrote: > Hello, > > The onreply route removal does n

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio does not responde if an rtpengine is unreachable

2018-12-24 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > It waits for packets from the network. Did you send registration via > UDP? No, via tcp and there was also tcp listener processes. -- Juha ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://l

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio does not responde if an rtpengine is unreachable

2018-12-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
This one seems to be a udp receiver and looks ok: #0 0x7f9958d359c3 in __recvfrom_nocancel () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:84 #1 0x55ce6a029443 in udp_rcv_loop () at core/udp_server.c:460 #2 0x55ce69f969cf in main_loop () at main.c:1621 #3 0x55ce69f9eb39 in main (argc

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio does not responde if an rtpengine is unreachable

2018-12-24 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > Can you see how many kamailio processes are running (w.g., with ps)? Are > there expected number of there? Same number of processes when I start K with proper rtpengine set and with one that has an rtpengine that does not respond. > If yes, take the PID of few

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio does not responde if an rtpengine is unreachable

2018-12-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Can you see how many kamailio processes are running (w.g., with ps)? Are there expected number of there? If yes, take the PID of few of them and attach with gdb, then grab the back trace in order to see what they do. Cheers, Daniel On 24.12.18 11:33, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mier

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio does not responde if an rtpengine is unreachable

2018-12-24 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > what happens when you send a sip message and have debug=3? Do you see > any logs printed? Nothing comes to syslog when register request arrives. Also kamailio does not respond to ctl command. Below is sample on what comes to syslog after start. -- Juha root@

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio does not responde if an rtpengine is unreachable

2018-12-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, what happens when you send a sip message and have debug=3? Do you see any logs printed? Cheers, Daniel On 23.12.18 10:07, Juha Heinanen wrote: > I noticed that if one rtpengine in a set is unreachable, kamailio 5.2 > does start, but does not process any SIP requests. Is this intentional?