I was using 5.2
I just downgraded to 5.0 and it starts properly.
Regards,
David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com
phone: +34669448337
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 8:51 PM David Villasmil <
david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've tried all the way up to
>
> /usr/sbin/kamailio -P
I've tried all the way up to
/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f
/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -M 1024 -m 2048
Regards,
David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com
phone: +34669448337
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 8:50 PM David Villasmil <
david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com>
actually i'm starting it manually like:
/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f
/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -M 16 -m 64
comes out like:
Mar 31 19:46:43 kamailio-phoenix /usr/sbin/kamailio[1752]: DEBUG:
[core/sr_module.c:844]: init_mod_child(): idx 1 rank 1: rtpengine [udp
Use -M to add more “package memory” (private memory per individual Kamailio
process). I forget what the default is, but try 8 or 12 MB (-M 8 or -M 12) for
likely happiness.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Mar 31, 2019, at 3:34 PM, David Villasmil
> wrote:
Hi,
Can you please elaborate about the part where you said "drop rest of the
packets".
If an OPTIONs is incoming you can send reply and then exit; a drop is like
silently discarding a packet as far as I know.
Do you meant to discard any further packets in same dialog or transaction
to be matched
Hello guys, i'm trying to configure rtpengine, but when starting kamailio
(with an empty table) i'm getting
```build_rtpp_socks(): no more pkg memory for rtpp_socks```
Can anyone help?
Regards,
David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com
phone: +34669448337
Hello Grant,
Can you elaborate more on your solution?
Thanks!
Regards,
David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com
phone: +34669448337
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:05 AM Grant Bagdasarian
wrote:
> I noticed it as well when switching from 5.2.0 to 5.2.1 using the docker
> images, but
Thanks Daniel!
You’re 100% right, that was the issue. Using a private variable I can see the
change. I also had an exit in place before the relay to test, removing that I
can see in Wireshark the request is being sent as expected.
Now I just have to figure out how to deal with UAC auth
Hello,
changes to sip message headers and body are not visible immediately, see:
*
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/faq/main#why_changes_made_to_headers_or
Use something like $var(x) to see if set is working.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 31.03.19 08:44, Andrew White wrote:
> Hey Daniel,
>
>
h have this for a custom rule agains spoecific messages:
sl_send_reply("200", "OK");
drop();
exit;
my question are if that rules are correct:
i want to drop but send firts to client a ok response..
i mean client receive "all are ok dont worry" and then drop the rest
packets..
recently i wrote a portion of my cfg file but i found that
i based my code in other sources and results of try/tach experiments
i cannot found the documents for the languaje of the core
i only found the link: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core
but in that link there's no
Hey Daniel,
Thanks for the patch!
It doesn’t appear to be throwing the error any longer. However as far as I can
see, the value is not being set. Here’s the code, called from
ksr_request_route()
def ksr_route_to_trunk()
KSR.info("Route to trunk")
if KSR::TM.t_is_set("failure_route") < 0
Hi Joan,
My guess is you’re providing a string value from the phones/terminals, rather
than an integer value.
9(39) ERROR: [db_ut.c:92]: db_str2int(): Unexpected characters: [-03-29
18:16:36]
9(39) ERROR: [db_val.c:76]: db_str2val(): error while converting
integer value from string
9(39)
13 matches
Mail list logo
