Hi,
During some tests with the module tmrec, we stumble upon an unexpected
behavior of the monthly recurrence with days of the week.
The last week does not match our expected date.
For example, the last Monday of March 2020 is day 30 (fifth Monday of the
month) however, neither the 5MO or -1MO
carrier<>kamailioes<->freeswitches
I am sending a record route header with a private SRV in the direction of
freeswitch boxes and removing it when sending packets to carrier. I am
using a different (pubic) SRV in contact header being sent to the carrier.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM
Hi,
why are you calling record_route_advertised_address(..) on these replies or
in-dialog requests? The record_route functions are usually used on initial
dialog forming requests (INVITE, SUBSCRIBE etc..).
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services –
They occur when calling it on responses to the initial INVITE, for example
183 and 200 OK.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE or
> when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE,
Hello,
are those messages printed during the processing of the initial INVITE
or when handling requests within dialog (re-INVITE, BYE, ...).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25.02.20 21:20, Daniel Greenwald wrote:
> I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route
> header with an SRV
I am using record_route_advertised_address to insert a record route header
with an SRV record. The header is added correctly and everything appears to
be working fine however I get a CRITICAL log error when calling
record_route_advertised_address('INTERNAL_SRV');
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> Hello,
>
> I didn't know about limitation, so far I needed only set_rtpengine_set()
> with one parameter. Now I am wondering why won't work for
> rtpengine_manage() because internally it calls the
> rtpengine_offer()/_answer().
I have never used
You can try event_route[tm:local-request] for this.
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, 15:36 Marco Capetta, wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a question regarding call forking and how to access failed
> branches: the ones for which kamailio sends out the CANCEL because on
> another one a 200OK was received.
> This
Hi All,
I have a question regarding call forking and how to access failed
branches: the ones for which kamailio sends out the CANCEL because on
another one a 200OK was received.
This is the scenario:
- A calls B
- 3 devices are registered on B, so a parallel forking is done to B1,
B2 and
Hello,
I didn't know about limitation, so far I needed only set_rtpengine_set()
with one parameter. Now I am wondering why won't work for
rtpengine_manage() because internally it calls the
rtpengine_offer()/_answer().
Not being familiar with this use case, I would to do a test and watch
the
Hello,
pushing this one to the top, just in case someone missed the first
message. Hoping to get someone knowing Python and using Postgres to help
a bit with kamcli.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17.02.20 16:53, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> anyone in the community with Python knowledge
On 19.02.20 21:55, David Villasmil wrote:
> +1 here. This feature would be a BIG plus. I’m also interested in what
> Nuno pointed out, how is it decided which registrar will send the
> OPTIONS to the UAC if we have multiple registrars sharing contacts via
> DMQ?
What scenarios/network
Thank you Daniel!!
Joel.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 23:45 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ok, thanks fr testing, I pushed a commit for it in master and 5.3 branches
> for now.
>
> Regarding the server id, I haven't implemented the dmq replication for
> location records and I guess
13 matches
Mail list logo
