Re: [SR-Users] REFER from MS teams to Kamailio.

Well. After some break I got it working. Yes, it's FS related and I had to use quite fat hack at Freeswitch to get MS hold/unhold working (with MS MOH).You know... MS does transfer to their side to play MOH and... they use re-invite to get the call that was blind transfered. As for FS I had to use

Re: [SR-Users] kamcmd mtree.match

Hello Henning, you hit the point. With prefix s: kamcmd mtree.match siteId s:49241531075267 0 is working. Thank you very much! Volker From: Henning Westerholt Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 21:03 To: Volker Denneberg ; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing L

Re: [SR-Users] kamcmd mtree.match

Hello Henning, I can't get any result different from "500 - Invalid Parameters", no matter what (nonsense) I enter kamcmd mtree.match siteId 49241531075212 0 kamcmd mtree.match siteId 49241531075212 2 kamcmd mtree.match siteId 49241531075212 77 kamcmd mtree.match siteI

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 5.3.0 and HEPv3 oversized traffic

Compared to previous versions, under 5.3, one must invoke the sip_trace_mode() function if you wanted to see the full SIP flow in Homer. It's not clear from documentation that it's a must function, but it did fix the problem in my case. For example: sip_trace(); sip_trace_mode("t") On Wed, Jun 3

Re: [SR-Users] Request documentation of Path Flow of Kamailio

Cheers Sent from Outlook Mobile From: Henning Westerholt Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 9:39:36 PM To: Daniel Cassar ; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Request documentation of Path Flow of Kamailio Hello, you can find

Re: [SR-Users] Request documentation of Path Flow of Kamailio

Hello, you can find many presentations (which includes diagrams etc..) in the archive of past Kamailioworld conferences on kamailio.org and also on youtube. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com From: Dani

Re: [SR-Users] Request documentation of Path Flow of Kamailio

One more thing if you have some diagrams that also be considered as how communication should pass from one client to another from a different network please can you send it to me and thanks. Sent from Outlook Mobile From: Daniel Cassar Se

Re: [SR-Users] Request documentation of Path Flow of Kamailio

Thanks :) Sent from Outlook Mobile From: Henning Westerholt Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 9:20:42 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Cc: Daniel Cassar Subject: RE: Request documentation of Path Flow of Kamailio Hello Daniel,

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 5.3.0 and HEPv3 oversized traffic

Hi Frederico, good point. Will also update my test setup and have a look at the new functions. Cheers Karsten Horsmann Federico Cabiddu schrieb am Mi., 3. Juni 2020, 20:41: > Hi, > did you try to capture the traffic going towards homer? > Siptrace module has internally changed in release 5.3 a

Re: [SR-Users] Request documentation of Path Flow of Kamailio

Hello Daniel, thanks for your interest in Kamailio. Looking forward to see the results of your work, please free to give some feedback if its finished. 😊 Being an open source project, there is many documentations available e.g. in our wiki. But most of its is more reference character and probab

[SR-Users] Request documentation of Path Flow of Kamailio

Dear Sir/Madam, I am a student, doing a dissertation about the performance of VPN throughout VoIP Services whereas I decided to configure Kamailio with Siremis Web User Interface on Linux 18.04LTS. I also am using GNS3 as I am trying to connect the server with 3 different routers as a form of s

Re: [SR-Users] Polycom looses registration within cluster scenario.

Actually I've fixed the issue by adding this: fix_nated_register(); add_contact_alias(); istead of fix_nated_contact(); and then On the second kam(if request coming from another kam) I'm doing this: handle_ruri_alias(); -- Sent from

Re: [SR-Users] kamcmd mtree.match

Hello Volker, have you tried with the prefix "s" as suggested on the list: kamcmd mtree.match siteId s:49241531075212 0 Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com From: Volker Denneberg Sent: Wednesday, June 3

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 5.3.0 and HEPv3 oversized traffic

Hi, did you try to capture the traffic going towards homer? Siptrace module has internally changed in release 5.3 and some things that used to work in 5.2 are not working or are not doing it in the expected way. There have been several fixes since 5.3.0, some of them are still only in master branch

Re: [SR-Users] Does DMQ auto-discover cluster members + how?

It sounds to me like these discovered nodes are DMQ adjacencies of another DMQ node that _is_ properly a member of the production DMQ cluster. On 6/3/20 2:01 PM, Henning Westerholt wrote: Hello George, In generally this should not happen. Have you already tried to restart the DMQ nodes? You

Re: [SR-Users] Does DMQ auto-discover cluster members + how?

Hello George, In generally this should not happen. Have you already tried to restart the DMQ nodes? You are not using a DNS record to populate the cluster members? Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com Fr

Re: [SR-Users] Trouble loading multiple javascripts with KEMI

Hello Hector, just answering about the performance part of the question – the performance impact is for the large majority of deployments outside not noticeable (for Lua, Python). Lua is comparable to native script, python is a bit slower. But you should not need to worry about it until you are

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 5.3.0 and HEPv3 oversized traffic

Hi, yes same config file. Forgot that to mention. Cheers Karsten Horsmann David Villasmil schrieb am Mi., 3. Juni 2020, 18:48: > Same config file? > > On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 17:20, Karsten Horsmann wrote: > >> Hi list, >> >> I saw some strange behavior in Kamailio 5.3.0 with HEPv3. My Kamailio

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 5.3.0 and HEPv3 oversized traffic

Same config file? On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 17:20, Karsten Horsmann wrote: > Hi list, > > I saw some strange behavior in Kamailio 5.3.0 with HEPv3. My Kamailio > serves webrtc and sip tls and captures that to an Homer 7.7 instance. > > I see only the UAC Parts of the message and not the answers from

[SR-Users] Trouble loading multiple javascripts with KEMI

I am using the module *app_jsdt *with *KEMI *and I am having trouble loading multiple javascript files. The interpreter only notices the last file that's loaded. What I am trying to do is separate my logic so that everything is not inside the kamailio.conf.js (or the main file the contains the nec

[SR-Users] Does DMQ auto-discover cluster members + how?

Hello all (again), When running dmq.list_nodes on one of my production kamailio servers, I get several entries corresponding to staging instances of kamailio. These staging instances are located on separate broadcast domains (different VLANs), and none of them are configured in the notification_ad

[SR-Users] Kamailio 5.3.0 and HEPv3 oversized traffic

Hi list, I saw some strange behavior in Kamailio 5.3.0 with HEPv3. My Kamailio serves webrtc and sip tls and captures that to an Homer 7.7 instance. I see only the UAC Parts of the message and not the answers from Kamailio in that scenario. Maybe I reached the max Paket size for udp. Hard to deb

Re: [SR-Users] Received ipv6 problem

I tried it but it is sending the unregister message to the second register user.I want to send the message to previous. First user register: ok Second user register: register, and kamailio will send a message unregister to the first. First user: get unregister Message Sorry, maybe I'm not understan

Re: [SR-Users] Received ipv6 problem

Ok, thank you so much. El mié., 3 jun. 2020 a las 12:54, Daniel-Constantin Mierla (< mico...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Hello, > > like Joel said, the reveiced filed in location record is set only for > NATed contacts and in ipv6 likely it is not the case. > > What you should do is like: > > $uac_re

Re: [SR-Users] Received ipv6 problem

Hello, like Joel said, the reveiced filed in location record is set only for NATed contacts and in ipv6 likely it is not the case. What you should do is like: $uac_req(ruri) = $(ulc (existingContact=>addr)[0]); if($(ulc(existingContact=>received)[0]) != $null) {    $uac_req(duri) = $(ulc(exist

Re: [SR-Users] Can't work around double SDP rewrite issue with rtpengine and config script SDP manipulation

The loose_route() is marking local Route headers for deletion, so after the msg_apply_changes() you don't see them. It should work fine if you do not need to inspect them afterwards, but if you are not sure, it is recommended do it before. Cheers, Daniel On 02.06.20 09:49, George Diamantopoulos w

Re: [SR-Users] Received ipv6 problem

Hi, thanks for your response. I appreciate the help, I really appreciate it. My problem is that I have to send a MESSAGE to an application to show the user a message. Like that: *$ var (address) = $ (ulc (existingContact => received) [0]);$ var (ruri) = $ (var (address) {s.substr, 4,0});#