Hi,
I'm trying to use the async module from a python3 Kemi script but it
conflicts with the keyword async. Any suggestions on how it can be used? Is
there an alternative to KSR.async.route()?
Thanks,
Ahmed
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List
For sake of correctness, as I tried to figure out again searching the
web what the actual issue, the conflict seems to be with XPATH
specifications that don't define default xmlns scope, they have NULL
scope for no-prefix tags which is not the same as the default xmlns. Not
100% sure, as I didn't
Thanks but this is already configured and still the same problem.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:47 PM Bastian Triller
wrote:
> Check if rr module is loaded before acc and rr's parameter append_from_tag
> is set to 1.
>
>
>
Check if rr module is loaded before acc and rr's parameter append_from_tag
is set to 1.
http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/5.3.x/modules/rr.html#rr.p.append_fromtag_id
http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/5.3.x/modules/acc.html#idm211
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022, 17:29 Ahmed Fouad wrote:
> Thanks
Hi Cyril,
happy to hear that you solved the problem.
About switching back to request_route type is not possible, it has to do
with the kamailio mechanism to suspend transactions. The callback route is
always a failure route.
The solution for rtpengine is either to call rtpengine_offer explicitly
Thanks for the reply but like I mentioned I tried to enable/disable direction
parameter but didn't help.
From: sr-users on behalf of Ovidiu Sas
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2022 12:44:39 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Fwd:
No problem, you got it. ;-)
> On Feb 10, 2022, at 9:16 AM, Mustafa Rahman wrote:
>
> __
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
> * sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
*
Daniel,
Many thanks!
Your "replace" solution looks more elegant than just remove the whole
string.
Regards,
Igor
Le 10.02.2022 à 16:52, Daniel-Constantin Mierla a écrit :
Hello,
actually the problem is the mess SIMPLE RFC authors made with XML
namespaces, by not setting and not using a
Hello,
Seems, there is a need to specify xmlns forcefully
As it's working when I do
$var(body) = $(rb{s.rm,xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dialog-info"});
So, I do need or to specify namespace or to remove this line from XML.
But if someone can comment on this (cause XML is a world on it's
Hello,
actually the problem is the mess SIMPLE RFC authors made with XML
namespaces, by not setting and not using a prefix for them, otherwise
the #012 is end-of-line printed by syslog as octal character.
The solutions:
1) replace "xmlns=" with something else like "xyzwq=":
$xml(body=>doc) =
Hello
Just to add, when I'm trying to dump $rb to logs, I'm getting this line
#012#012 #012 terminated#012
#012
So, I expect problem is in this #012 + extra spaces. Is there a way to
clean it up in an easy way?
Regards,
Igor
Le 10.02.2022 à 16:01, Igor Olhovskiy a écrit :
Hello,
I think it is not easy to impose any further restriction not to
distribute the sources, but one can try ... in some (many) countries
licenses and patents are not recognized or not enforced.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10.02.22 11:47, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Come to think of it, I imagine the license has
Hello,
On 10.02.22 10:51, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Just to add - your general statement “From this perspective, none of
> the config files (no matter they are native scripting, lua, python,
> javascript, etc...) are forced to be GPL, it is the decision of the
> config author
Hello,
I'm trying to get state of endpoint from PUBLISH message in a most
simple way using xmlops module
Trying to make this
$xml(body=>doc) = $rb;
log("L_ERR", "$rU is now in state
$xml(body=>xpath:/dialog-info/dialog/state)\n");
XML in PUBLISH itself
confirmed
Actual text
Come to think of it, I imagine the license has language saying that it cannot
be superseded in part or in whole by any contradictory agreement.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Feb 10, 2022, at 5:42 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> Is it legally possible for a
Check the documentation and adjust your config accordingly:
http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/5.3.x/modules/acc.html#acc.p.detect_direction
modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 1)
In your config is set to 0.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 08:01 Ahmed Fouad wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
Is it legally possible for a customer to separately contract away a right that
the license otherwise affords them, such as the GPL right to demand source code
and then turn around and distribute that source code?
I have to wonder if it’s possible in the US. It seems like it shouldn’t be, but
Hello,
Just to add - your general statement “From this perspective, none of the config
files (no matter they are native scripting, lua, python, javascript, etc...)
are forced to be GPL, it is the decision of the config author what's its
license.”
This seems to be pretty clear to me as well,
Hello,
for me it’s seems to be not that clear, its open to interpretation. But this is
more a theoretical discussion, it should be clarified from a lawyer.
To quote from the GPL FAQ:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL
“Another similar and very common
> On 10 Feb 2022, at 09:01, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 10.02.22 08:36, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> just to add to the discussion:
>>
>> Please have a look to the GPLv2 FAQ, many topics you’ve raised are discussed
>> there
Hello,
On 10.02.22 08:36, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> just to add to the discussion:
>
>
>
> * Please have a look to the GPLv2 FAQ, many topics you’ve raised are
> discussed there
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html
> * You should really
22 matches
Mail list logo
