[SR-Users] Record-Route advertised per branch

Hello, Is there any way to advertise a different IP Address in the Record-Route header individually per branch? I have a setup here - where Kamailio is listening on 2 different interfaces: Local IP and External IP. At the moment if the packet is coming through the internal interface - I'm checkin

Re: [SR-Users] Record-Route advertised per branch

Have you tried calling *t_save_lumps()* before relaying, even before RR? On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 7:59 AM Ilie Soltanici wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any way to advertise a different IP Address in the Record-Route > header individually per branch? > > I have a setup here - where Kamailio is liste

Re: [SR-Users] Record-Route advertised per branch

Hello, Thank you, added it now - still the same, unfortunately. Regards, On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 13:29, Sergiu Pojoga wrote: > Have you tried calling *t_save_lumps()* before relaying, even before RR? > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 7:59 AM Ilie Soltanici > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Is there any way

Re: [SR-Users] Record-Route advertised per branch

It only work for request route.Le 16 juin 2022 14:19, Ilie Soltanici a écrit :Hello,Thank you, added it now - still the same, unfortunately.Regards,On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 13:29, Sergiu Pojoga wrote:Have you tried calling t_save_lumps() before relaying, even before RR?On Thu, Ju

Re: [SR-Users] Record-Route advertised per branch

Have you tried just *record_route()* with *enable_double_rr* option enabled? All things considered, RR should take care of it all by itself, per branch. A script snippet could help. On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:05 AM Patrick Karton wrote: > It only work for request route. > > Le 16 juin 2022 14:1

Re: [SR-Users] Record-Route advertised per branch

I just did this quick POC test which worked as expected, it added a single RR with public advertised and double RR with both public and private advertise for the branch that routes to a private interface. Prerequisites: - mhomed=1 - modparam("rr", "enable_double_rr", 1) - listen=YOUR_PUB

Re: [SR-Users] RTPengine in Debian

Hi, On 6/15/22 11:46, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, good news, indeed! Thanks to all involved! Not being very familiar with all Debian releasing policies, does that mean the next Debian stable (v 12) will ship it? Or is it going to take one more  release cycle, to go from Debian Unsta