Re: [SR-Users] Change reply code reason other than using change_reply_status

2022-08-12 Thread Henning Westerholt
Hello, Just to add the obvious solution as well, the change_reply_status(..) could be adapted to support pseudo-variables. But of course, this needs some code extensions. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services -

Re: [SR-Users] Change reply code reason other than using change_reply_status

2022-08-12 Thread Patrick Karton
Thanks Alex. great indeed. De : sr-users de la part de Alex Balashov Envoyé : vendredi 12 août 2022 18:12 À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Change reply code reason other than using change_reply_status Depending on what you’re

Re: [SR-Users] Change reply code reason other than using change_reply_status

2022-08-12 Thread Alex Balashov
Depending on what you’re trying to accomplish, you could intercept the negative reply (if a negative reply is what you’re trying to change) in a failure_route and use send_reply() to send back an entirely different reply to the caller, functionally altering the status/reason. — Alex > On Aug

[SR-Users] Change reply code reason other than using change_reply_status

2022-08-12 Thread Patrick Karton
hello is there a way to change reply code reason other than using () function. because the first parameterc of change_reply_status needs to be a constant so i can not use pseudo var for first argument of that function. so i use change_reply_status_code to change to code with a pseudo. but i

[SR-Users] Need help with multi mtree

2022-08-12 Thread Benoît Panizzon
Heya I try to use mutli tree mtree to define multiple 'named' prefixes. id(int,auto) tname(string) tprefix(string) tvalue(string) 0:tech:+1:1 0:tech:+9:1 0:cust:+1:1 0:cust:+9:0 Kamailio is not complaining while loading this file, but mtree.summary shows no entries. Any hint on what I may be