Hello,
Generally you should use a recent and maintained operating system and also a
maintained version of Kamailio (5.5.x or 5.6.x).
Are you saying that the xcap module work in Kamailio 3.1.x but not anymore in a
newer version?
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt -
I have the index and label from a prior suspension. They are keyed in htable by
AOR/RURI.
—
Sent from mobile, apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Nov 1, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> if not using tsilo, how do you identify the transaction for which
Hi Sir/Madam,
I set up Ubuntu 10.04 + opensue3.1, then the xcap module work fine.
Then seems the last version xcap module could NOT send the "GET" message with
digest, when get 401 response.
Is there any parameter which should be set, in order to fix it?
Thanks!
GET
Hello,
if not using tsilo, how do you identify the transaction for which to add
new branches?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 01.11.22 00:44, Alex Balashov wrote:
> And indeed, ts_append_to() almost does what I want, but it still requires
> that I launder my contacts through a registrar ‘domain’.
>
> Is
Hello,
likely the commit was done due to:
- https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2013-April/019470.html
However, apparently, even not common practice, PRACK can be challenged
for authentication.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 31.10.22 16:13, Henning Westerholt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this was
Hi Henning
> what about just using the approach in the documentation and example cfg, take
> the from domain as realm for the challenge?
This is what I am doing now, tentatively...
The Issue with this, is that we have an SBC in front of Kamailio, that
uses the R-URI domain of the initial
Hello,
what about just using the approach in the documentation and example cfg, take
the from domain as realm for the challenge?
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
-Original Message-
From: sr-users On Behalf Of
Ah, so location laundering all around. :-)
Well, I guess I’ll just ephemerally save() and shortly unregister() for the
sole purpose of pushing branches into the given transaction … :-)
—
Sent from mobile, apologies for brevity and errors.
> On 1 Nov 2022, at 03:02, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
Hi
As mentioned in the last email, we have a CPE which adds credentials to
any request so I would like to validate them.
We use $rd as realm. Let's use example.com as example.
During the initial INVITE, this works as expected.
I try to only show the headers I think are relevant to the issue I
Hello,
the implementation in the other project actually creates some user records in a
fake message for that functionality.
The tm module could be of course extended with a PR.
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
10 matches
Mail list logo
