[SR-Users] Re: Remove all Via Header or create custome Via Header

Hi Alex > Are you talking about the proxy's own Via hop? Exactly... > If your "advertised" address is an IP rather than a DNS name, that > should be mimicked in the Via headers inserted by the proxy. Well the issue is, that we operate two kamailio proxy with DMQ synced states so that if one fai

[SR-Users] Kamailio Lagging or Unreachable in Asterisk Peer

Dear All, I have three Kamailio in my production environment and I have written some code in Kamailio.cfg using SqlOps to insert data into the database on another remote server for every call. I deployed the code in one of the Kamailio and it inserted data perfectly fine into the database but as s

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

Paolo, check your gmail and linkedin, you should have something from me yes? On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 5:11 PM Paolo Visintin wrote: > Hello Terrance, > We have successfully handled k8s clusters with kamailio, asterisk and > rtpengine , using Multus cni and macvlan / ipvlan for better performance

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

> On Dec 22, 2022, at 4:26 PM, Terrance Devor wrote: > > That is a very good point Alex, this caused me to step in and ask the > community for someone that has successfully deployed > Kamailio/Asterisk/RTPEngine to a Kubernetes cluster to reach out to me. We > would be interested in working wi

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

In an environment such as AWS/GCP , why would you need an rtp proxy? Just use the inatnce's public ip and isolate that from the signaling. unless there's a very specific scenario, i don't much see the need. On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 22:18, Alex Balashov wrote: > > > On Dec 22, 2022, at 3:06 PM, Ter

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

Hello Terrance, We have successfully handled k8s clusters with kamailio, asterisk and rtpengine , using Multus cni and macvlan / ipvlan for better performance . Here you can find my presentation at Kwc : https://youtu.be/QOB998rAyUM Feel free to ask if needed Paolo Il giorno gio 22 dic 2022 a

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 4:21 PM Alex Balashov wrote: > > > On Dec 22, 2022, at 3:06 PM, Terrance Devor wrote: > > > > We have been trying to get this deployed into our kubernetes cluster for > a year now, really appreciate the support from the community. > > Are you sure this statement can't be

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

> On Dec 22, 2022, at 3:06 PM, Terrance Devor wrote: > > We have been trying to get this deployed into our kubernetes cluster for a > year now, really appreciate the support from the community. Are you sure this statement can't be mined for deeper insight into the practicality and payoff of

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 12:05 PM Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Terrance, > > Both are actively maintained & developed with a slightly different focus. > Speaking of k8s in particular you might want to check presentation done by > Liviu Chircu at the last OpenSIPS summit here: > > https://youtu.be/JwO0Um

[SR-Users] Re: sr-users Digest, Vol 211, Issue 47

Do no reply to digest messages from mailing list, if you want to engage in discussion, switch to normal subscription and reply to the specific message. With digest, it is not easy to know what discussion thread you reply to and also the archive does not index it properly. Cheers, Daniel On 22.1

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

"up to 91%". -Max P.S. We are usually running off master. ;-) On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:25 AM Maxim Sobolev wrote: > That is certainly not true or inaccurate. The RTPProxy is quite a mature > package, so we don't have to release it every few months. Instead I am > focusing on testing it, we are

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

That is certainly not true or inaccurate. The RTPProxy is quite a mature package, so we don't have to release it every few months. Instead I am focusing on testing it, we are probably the most tested package in the area with coverage up to this very reason you can find the rtpproxy bundled with thi

[SR-Users] Re: sr-users Digest, Vol 211, Issue 47

It's not easy and takes a long time to perfect, but our entire VoIP infrastructure is Dockerized, and composed of Asterisk, MySQL, Redis, NodeJS and Kamailio+RTPEngine (not rtpproxy, since rtpproxy isn't maintained anymore). No docker-level port forwarding required anywhere, since the entire sys

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

Hello, at least from the project site of rtpproxy it seems to be not maintained anymore: https://github.com/sippy/rtpproxy/releases The last release is from more than 2 years ago. Of course it's working for basic scenarios. Nowadays you most probably want also use transcoding or advanced en/d

[SR-Users] Re: Remove all Via Header or create custome Via Header

Are you talking about the proxy's own Via hop? If your "advertised" address is an IP rather than a DNS name, that should be mimicked in the Via headers inserted by the proxy. > On Dec 22, 2022, at 10:10 AM, Benoit Panizzon wrote: > > Hi out there! > > While experimenting with the listen and a

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

Terrance, Both are actively maintained & developed with a slightly different focus. Speaking of k8s in particular you might want to check presentation done by Liviu Chircu at the last OpenSIPS summit here: https://youtu.be/JwO0UmauuT4?t=13034 Most of the stuff he talked about would apply to Kama

[SR-Users] Remove all Via Header or create custome Via Header

Hi out there! While experimenting with the listen and adverize 'hostname' option I came across a voice switch, which I suppose fails if the Via header is not an IPv4 address. There is a record_route_advertised_address(address) in the RR module, to set a customer Record-Route Header. Is there som

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 3:52 AM David Villasmil < david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://github.com/Viking-VoIP > > Been working on that on and off, that might give you a few ideas (it’s AWS > EKS based and freeswitch, but still) > > On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 08:16, Henning Westerholt wrot

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

I did see the CyCore project and tried to connect with Laurel Lauson and Sean McCord on LinkedIn On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 9:18 PM Fred Posner wrote: > On Dec 21, 2022, at 8:41 PM, Terrance Devor wrote: > > > Does anyone have experience in deploying Kamailio, Asterisk and RTPProxy > to a dockeriz

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:15 AM Henning Westerholt wrote: > Hello, > > we have done some projects in this area. Its some work, but doable. The > benefits of k8s are not that great for this kind of applications and you > will not achieve a perfect isolation (security/network level). > > As a note,

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

Wow gents! I really appreciate the input here. As to why we are doing this? It's because we have all our applications deployed to the k8s instance and it's easier for us to maintain/migrate once the heavy initial lifting has been completed. On the note of RTPProxy vs RTPEngine, which of the 2 is a

[SR-Users] Re: Which KEMI-language has the lowest runtime overhead?

if you have node.js developers, consult with them if https://duktape.org/ is ok integration is not based on https://v8.dev/ (used by node.js) Marek Dne 18/12/2022 v 09:00 Henning Westerholt napsal(a): Hello, for practical scenarios it does not really matter, if you use one of the modern KE

[SR-Users] Re: IMS integration with AS

Hi, Carsten. Understood, thank you for clarifications. -- obelousov.tel On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:28 AM Carsten Bock wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > This is supported by Kamailio IMS and we use it rather frequently. > > However, one point is your description is not properly right: > " constructs Registe

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

I would have to agree with Henning that this may be more trouble than it's worth, particularly when it comes to the bottom-line result. — Sent from mobile, apologies for brevity and errors. > On Dec 22, 2022, at 2:22 AM, Henning Westerholt wrote: > >  > Hello, > > we have done some projects

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

While it does not involve Kamailio or Asterisk, I've set up a K8S cluster with Jambonz for my company. Jambonz uses drachtio, freeswitch and rtpengine under the hood and has a helm-chart too On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 14:48, David Villasmil < david.villasmil.w...@gmail.c

[SR-Users] Re: IMS integration with AS

Hi Oleg, This is supported by Kamailio IMS and we use it rather frequently. However, one point is your description is not properly right: " constructs Register message (which keeps all details of subscriber register message) " If you need to have all the details of the subscriber register messag

[SR-Users] Re: Dockerized VoIP Stack

https://github.com/Viking-VoIP Been working on that on and off, that might give you a few ideas (it’s AWS EKS based and freeswitch, but still) On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 08:16, Henning Westerholt wrote: > Hello, > > we have done some projects in this area. Its some work, but doable. The > benefits