[SR-Users] Re: topos vs topoh, any reason for putting a private IP in the Contact header?

2023-01-26 Thread Karsten Horsmann
Hi, I am very happy with Topos and redis for such things. You should give it a try. And topos had some nice contact header features also. Benoit Panizzon schrieb am Do., 26. Jan. 2023, 16:01: > Hi > > I'm trying to work around Route-Header and Via Issues with the two > topology hiding modules t

[SR-Users] Locally generated BYE sent to private IP

2023-01-26 Thread James Lipski
Hi all, I'm doing some experimenting with kamailio -- currently looking for a replacement of our existing (aging) SIP infrastructure. One of the experiments that I'm doing is testing the dialog module's dlg_set_timeout function. The issue that I'm having is while I do see that kamailio is gene

[SR-Users] ACK on RE-Invite is send to UAC NATed Internal port instead of public port

2023-01-26 Thread Angelo Sipper
Hi, My setup has: (TLS)UAC 77.1.1.1 -> (TLS)Kamailio 17.17.17.211 (UDP) -> (UDP)Kamailio 17.17.17.181 (UDP) -> Carrier(UDP) Both Kamailio are 4.3 with minor modifications on default cfg, and Topoh and TLS modules are used. I am having an issue on some outbound calls from nated UACs. On these call

[SR-Users] Re: topos vs topoh, any reason for putting a private IP in the Contact header?

2023-01-26 Thread Patrick Karton
Male sure record_route is used in kamailio script.Normally it should be used in initial invite.Le 26 janv. 2023 16:43, Benoit Panizzon a écrit :Hi Patrick Agreed, this could become an issue when we do dual stack ipv4 and ipv6 unless we use a hostname which will probably cause other issues.

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio 5.6 on AlmaLinux 8 TLS crash

2023-01-26 Thread Sergey Safarov
I think you have installed packages for the CentOS build. To build CentOS package used CentOS Stream. Maybe some difference is present between Stream and RHEL branches. On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 6:33 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > it seems to be at start up, does it happen every

[SR-Users] Re: topos vs topoh, any reason for putting a private IP in the Contact header?

2023-01-26 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Hi Patrick Agreed, this could become an issue when we do dual stack ipv4 and ipv6 unless we use a hostname which will probably cause other issues. > But overall sip compliant component must Always follow Route ip before > contact IP. I will test how the know buggy client behaves. While testing

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio 5.6 on AlmaLinux 8 TLS crash

2023-01-26 Thread Ihor Olkhovskyi
Daniel, Yes, with help of a collegaue was found it's SNMP dealing the problems. Turning it off helps. bt full: Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /etc/kamailio//kamailio.cfg'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x7f5b722feaff in raise

[SR-Users] Re: topos vs topoh, any reason for putting a private IP in the Contact header?

2023-01-26 Thread Patrick Karton
Hello,You can put any IP for Contact in topoh module private or public.The only issue is that most of the time you dont know Always what is the right IP you need to put there and is even worst if your kamailio listens on More than 2 Ips.Topoh parameter for Contact IP is a static one.so you can not

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio 5.6 on AlmaLinux 8 TLS crash

2023-01-26 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, it seems to be at start up, does it happen every time? Cheers, Daniel On 26.01.23 14:43, Ihor Olkhovskyi wrote: > Hello! > > Currently testing Kamailio on Almalinux 8 (stated to be RHEL 8 binary > compatible) and got this while trying to get TLS working: > > /usr/sbin/kamailio[32858]: INF

[SR-Users] Re: rtpengine - SRTP <> RTP

2023-01-26 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Here's a quick guide on how to capture and decrypt encrypted traffic: https://voipembedded.wordpress.com/2021/03/22/troubleshooting-kamailio-encrypted-sip-traffic/ -ovidiu On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:46 AM Krzysztof Drewicz wrote: > > śr., 25 sty 2023 o 19:22 Karsten Horsmann napisał(a): > > > >

[SR-Users] topos vs topoh, any reason for putting a private IP in the Contact header?

2023-01-26 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Hi I'm trying to work around Route-Header and Via Issues with the two topology hiding modules topoh and topos and trying to figure out, which one works better for our environment. My conclusion so far: topos creates very clean header, but needs a database or redis. I'm always reluctant in adding

[SR-Users] Re: rtpengine - SRTP <> RTP

2023-01-26 Thread Krzysztof Drewicz
śr., 25 sty 2023 o 19:22 Karsten Horsmann napisał(a): > > Hi, > > If you want the signaling that is encrypted see in plaintext you can use > Kamailio module siptrace. Is siptrace only for working with homer? I just need a plaintext dump to a file or something like that. > sipdump and sipcapture

[SR-Users] Kamailio 5.6 on AlmaLinux 8 TLS crash

2023-01-26 Thread Ihor Olkhovskyi
Hello! Currently testing Kamailio on Almalinux 8 (stated to be RHEL 8 binary compatible) and got this while trying to get TLS working: /usr/sbin/kamailio[32858]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:347]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: ca_list='(null)' /usr/sbin/kamailio[32858]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:354]: k

[SR-Users] ACK on Reverse Invite is send to NATed Internal port instead of public port

2023-01-26 Thread Angelo Sipper
Hi, I am having an issue on some outbound calls from nated UAC. On these calls our SBC receive reverse invites from the carrier side within the call. When this happens, my SBC(Kamailio1) sends the invite to UAC and the UAC sends 200 OK (SDP). Unfortunately my SBC(Kamailio1) sends back the ACK not t