[SR-Users] CANCEL timeout in branch route does not trigger any failure routes

2023-03-30 Thread Richard Chan
Hi Kamailio users How can I get a failure route to trigger in timeout-to-CANCEL in a parallel forking scenario? Parallel forking test scenario 1. one(the main - 0) branch picks up the call 2. 2nd branch sends CANCEL (expecting 487 etc) - but the callee does not send any replies Result: No failur

[SR-Users] Re: Handling stateless replies with kemi

2023-03-30 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Hello Henning, Everything is working ok. I guess the docs should be more clear (I was expecting some dedicated route). I will try to update the docs. Thanks, Ovidiu On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:30 AM Henning Westerholt wrote: > > Hello, > > have you tried to just define a onreply_route: > > // Man

[SR-Users] Re: Handling stateless replies with kemi

2023-03-30 Thread Henning Westerholt
Hello, have you tried to just define a onreply_route: // Manage incoming replies // equivalent of onreply_route[...]{} function ksr_onreply_manage() { KSR.dbg("incoming reply\n"); var scode = KSR.kx.gets_status(); if (scode>100 && scode<=299) { ksr_route_na

[SR-Users] Re: Rancher, AWS, and Elastic IP

2023-03-30 Thread Henning Westerholt
Hello, Alex already provided more context - just some additional notes: You could of course put Kamailio in a container without using k8s, this is something that several people are doing. Just using it as deployment tool, to have a uniform management for operations etc.. You usually have it run