Hello,
To add to my previous reply, the reason for asking whether if it's possible to
change the order of transactions (CANCEL first, then INVITE) is I've ran into
issues where 2 200OKs are being received roughly at the same time; such as the
call example from my previous post, where the receiv
Also, since a picture is worth a thousand words, it can be seen here that the
INVITE for the new branch is sent before the CANCEL of the earlier branch.
Again, I'm not sure why this would make any difference, but it does seem to be
the current behavior.
[A screenshot of a computer screen Des
I can reproduce this behavior easily with the config below, but I'm not quite
sure how/why it matters.
request_route {
xinfo("[$ru] recieved\n");
$rd = "target2";
append_branch("sip:$rU@target1", "1.0");
t_load_contacts();
t_next_contacts();
t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILU
Hello,
As with my previous update, I'm using the skeleton configurations (with minor
changes, such as defining an external voicemail destination) just for testing
purposes. With the skeleton configurations, I'm still seeing that the INVITE
packet to the voicemail server sent first, and then the
Your suggestion led me to review the DNS settings and found
`dns_cache_negative_ttl=600` which kind of matches the occasional dns
outage period. Changes the value to 0 (disabled). Will see how it goes, so
far no more errors of this kind.
Thanks again Daniel.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 1:02 PM Dani
On 28.09.23 13:13, Olle E. Johansson via sr-users wrote:
>
>
>> On 28 Sep 2023, at 12:36, Ivan Ribakov via sr-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Olle,
>>
>> Yes, I realised by now that taking enabled Kamailio modules into
>> account when generating SBOM is too much to ask. I'd be ok with
>> obtaining full
I see, thanks for sharing your experience Olle.
I'm no autoconf expert - does anyone know if it's possible to dump more or
less concise list of all linked libraries used either during build
configuration or the actual build process? I'm thinking that should be
pretty close to the source of truth f
Hello,
when this happens, can you look at the cache content and see if the
corresponding record has negative_entry set to yes? If that's the case,
the record was marked as bad (unresolvable due to a failed dns query or
maybe blocklisting activated on 503).
Cheers,
Daniel
On 28.09.23 14:48, Sergi
Aloha,
I'm experiencing this internal DNS problem with Kamailio, can't seem to
figure out what's causing it. Maybe someone can help.
Essentially, from time to time (one or two times a day) this situation
happens, starting with logs:
linux kamailio[773]: ERROR: uac [uac_reg.c:1163]: uac_reg_send(
> On 28 Sep 2023, at 12:36, Ivan Ribakov via sr-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi Olle,
>
> Yes, I realised by now that taking enabled Kamailio modules into account when
> generating SBOM is too much to ask. I'd be ok with obtaining full list of
> Kamailio dependencies (with transitive dependencies if
i tried. but it does't work.
modparam("rr", "enable_double_rr", 1)
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipien
modparam("rr", "enable_double_rr", 1)
i tried. but it does't work
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipient
Hi Olle,
Yes, I realised by now that taking enabled Kamailio modules into account
when generating SBOM is too much to ask. I'd be ok with obtaining full list
of Kamailio dependencies (with transitive dependencies if possible) and
then manually filtering them based on module usage. Not sure if at a
There are many possibilities.
One of - use listen names and advertised address with allow_double_rr
option.
Once you do that - you'll be able to add 2 rr headers, and kamailio will be
able to handle gateway functionality between interfaces via RR/Route headers
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023, 11:53 codenot
UA1(192.168.0.1) --> kamailio (internal:192.168.0.2 public:1.1.1.1) -->
UA2(2.2.2.2)
if in UA1 INVITE, I write KSR.rr.record_route().
so UA2(2.2.2.2) received sip msg (Record-Route: ), so
Kamailio can received BYE/ACK from UA2.
but，Kamailio can't received BYE/ACK from UA1.
if in UA1 INVI
Still digging through this. There are tools that can list your packages if you
install Linux packages, i.e. Debian.
But there are no tools that can parse your kamailio config to really see what’s
loaded and active.
It all depends on what you want to do with the SBOM - if you want to check for
v
Hello Geoff,
thanks for the debug output, it's as I suspected and also described earlier
from Daniel.
As already mentioned, the common way of working with dispatcher is to call the
ds_select_dst() in the request route, and then in the failure route just
iterate over this set of destinations. I
Hello,
I think Olle was looking into that some month ago, maybe (when he reads it) can
share some of his research results if possible.
You can also find some of his articles e.g., on his linkedin page.
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https:
18 matches
Mail list logo
