Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> It might be a regression by commit 675f6c02248, can you try with latest
> master or with the patch of the commit:
>
> -
> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/4dc37aee853bbcf9d7fdb96245b76aaa8dfa2930
I tried with latest master and it started OK.
On 11.03.24 20:45, Juha Heinanen via sr-users wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> what are the operating system and the compiler used?
> Sorry, Debian 12 using gcc version 12.2.0.
It might be a regression by commit 675f6c02248, can you try with latest
master or with the patch of the
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> what are the operating system and the compiler used?
Sorry, Debian 12 using gcc version 12.2.0.
-- Juha
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello,
what are the operating system and the compiler used?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11.03.24 07:45, Juha Heinanen via sr-users wrote:
> My SIP proxy didn't start with Kamailio 5.8 using the same config that
> starts OK with 5.7. The error is:
>
> 2024-03-11T06:56:06.457107+02:00 lohi
My SIP proxy didn't start with Kamailio 5.8 using the same config that
starts OK with 5.7. The error is:
2024-03-11T06:56:06.457107+02:00 lohi /usr/bin/sip-proxy[2358954]: DEBUG: acc
[acc_mod.c:362]: parse_failed_filter(): failed_filter 0 = 407
2024-03-11T06:56:06.457265+02:00 lohi
You can obtain the destination set IP from $dd, or $(du{uri.host}). However,
you can't just modify the To URI like that.
You will need to do it in a way that doesn't break standards-based
proscriptions about what a proxy can do, otherwise endpoint A can look at the
modified header received in
hi,
i have kamailio acting as SBC
i need hide topology like this
ds_select_dst(DSP_GRP_TRUNK, "6");
$tu = $(tu{re.subst,/PRIVATE_IP/IP_OF_CURRENT_SELECTED_DISPATCHER/g});
what is best way for IP extraction from $du?
thanks
Marek
__
Hello Kamailians!
Before I start going down this path - anyone that has written a Kamailio Yocto
layer and want to share either layer or experience or both?
For those that doesn’t know: Yocto is a toolkit for building your own Linux
distros for embedded systems.
/O
Thank you everyone for the feedback. I realized my initial post was
bereft of details. I'm not at liberty to share the entire script, but
I will try to distill it. The original INVITE is sent to our internal
STI-VS which returns a 302. Kamilio handles that locally and then
sends the INVITE back to
There's also the question of when the header was appended as well, right?
Calling append_hf() after creating a transaction will only apply that header to
the current branch, not to subsequent branches.
-Original Message-
From: James Browne via sr-users
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2024
One pitfall would be to think that this function would add this header
field to any reply that kamailio would send. This append_hf() function
should add a header field to a SIP request that it *relays*, but would
not add it to a response that kamailio *generates* (for that, you
would use the
Indeed, it has become a bit of a cliché that msg_apply_changes() should be
called after append_hf(), uac_replace_from(), etc.
This should be dispelled. In the vast majority of use-cases, it is not only
unnecessary, but highly undesirable.
-- Alex
> On 11 Mar 2024, at 06:45, Henning Westerholt
Hello,
the usage of msg_apply_changes is not necessary (not even recommended) for
append_hf (and other functions) to work. The OP was talking about a packet
capture, so I assume that he got the capture after the proxy send out the
message.
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt –
As I was involed in this conversation via other channel, some comments on
this to the community.
1. Kamailio is acting according to these parts of 3261 -
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3261.html#section-18.2.1
If the host portion of the "sent-by" parameter
contains a domain name, or if it
Using
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/textopsx.html#textopsx.f.msg_apply_changes
might be relevant in your case...
With best wishes,
Unai Rodriguez
On 11 Mar 2024 at 09:22 +0100, Benoit Panizzon via sr-users
, wrote:
> Hi Calvin
>
> > I'm trying to add something simple like
Hi Calvin
> I'm trying to add something simple like the following:
>
> append_hf("X-testheader: True\r\n", "From");
>
> However, I don't see my X-testheader in a packet capture. Are there
> any common pitfalls that would prevent append_hf from working as
> expected?
Weird, I use this a lot and
16 matches
Mail list logo
