charm, thanks a lot!
Best,
Andreas
> On 20.02.2019, at 12:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 20.02.19 11:58, Andreas Granig wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I’ve a scenario where after lookup() I get multiple branches, and I want to
>> drop s
Hi all,
I’ve a scenario where after lookup() I get multiple branches, and I want to
drop some or all of them based on some filter criteria in a branch route before
sending requests out. Problem is that if all branches are dropped, kamailio
replies with some implicitly generated 500 server error
thub.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1453
>
> So apparently it was overlooked when backporting to release versions of
> 5.1.x.
>
> Can you cherry pick that commit and test? If all ok, you can push the
> backport to 5.1 branch. The master and 5.2 should be fine.
>
> Cheers,
> Da
iel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> can you try with the patch from next commit:
>
> -
> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/55c7f781be7cc40d0cd161640a47244aad60c0e7
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 28.11.18 12:34, Andreas Granig wrote:
>> H
arted to
> play fresh with it and get this error? Or an old configuration that used
> to work in the past is now throwing the error?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 28.11.18 12:13, Andreas Granig wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently playing with presence_mwi in kamailio
Hi,
Currently playing with presence_mwi in kamailio 5.1, and it appears the issue
reported by Juha two years ago at
https://lists.kamailio.org//pipermail/sr-dev/2016-September/036609.html seems
to have appeared again somewhere along the way.
I’m sending a PUBLISH with message-summary event typ
Dear community,
I'd like to inform you about Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise (ALE) acquiring a
majority stake in Sipwise. Over the last 10 years, we at Sipwise were committed
to contributing significant efforts to the open source telecom environment,
resulting amongst others in the free and open sour
Hi,
We've seen around 400 concurrent calls for G711<->Opus on a rather slow
12-core E5-2420@1.90GHz for some first preliminary benchmarks.
Andreas
On 2018-02-26 21:27, Brooks Bridges wrote:
> I realize the transcoding support is rather new, however has anyone run
> any real world tests on it yet
Hi Lucian,
Yes, it's probably worth noting in the README that for use_domain=0 the
usrdom key should be adjusted. So does it work for you now?
Eventually, I'll extend the module to ship with default key definitions
for the most common modules, however it'll take some time because it
needs an anal
