Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 13:40:25, David Villasmil wrote: > In freeswitch you have the uuid_hold, etc api: > https://www.freeswitch.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=1966 > 741#content/view/1966741 > > You call the API uuid_hold [uuid] or uuid_hold off [uuid] to take the > ch

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 19:11:02, Fred Posner wrote: > I would greatly appreciate it if we took any further discussion to a > different forum and remember the first rule of Kamailio: > > "Be respectful > Thank you all. Thank you Fred, sincerely. I also see no further purpose in continui

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 17:18:20, Fred Posner wrote: > I think the overwhelming response from the group at large is that what > you are looking to do is best handled through a variety of b2bua programs. Yes, I understand that. My responses to these suggestions have largely been based on

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 17:26:45, Henning Westerholt wrote: > Hello Antony, > > As discussed earlier, Kamailio is not the right tool for your specific > requirements. I accept that. > Here on this list are people naturally most experienced with this software. Yes, obviously. > We can a

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 16:16:29, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 2021 2:33:42, Antony Stone wrote: > > > > 2) Put a B2BUA in front of that SIP Endpoint, and throught API, DTMF, > > > RPC or witchever method that B2BUA giv

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 15:11:54, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > If you have a DUMB SIP endpoint, as you have, that lacks the features to > put a call on hold, transfer a call, etc. YOU ONLY HAVE 2 WAYS of solving > that. > > 1) Throw that SIP Endpoint to the nearest trash bin you c

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 13:40:25, David Villasmil wrote: > In freeswitch you have the uuid_hold, etc api: > https://www.freeswitch.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=1966 > 741#content/view/1966741 > > You call the API uuid_hold [uuid] or uuid_hold off [uuid] to take the > ch

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

On Wednesday 18 August 2021 at 00:20:20, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > On Tuesday 17 August 2021 at 21:22:37, Antony Stone wrote: > > On Tuesday 17 August 2021 at 21:55:15, Fred Posner wrote: > > > On 8/17/21 2:20 PM, Antony Stone wrote: > > > > If not, can

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

On Tuesday 17 August 2021 at 22:39:49, Fred Posner wrote: > On 8/17/21 4:22 PM, Antony Stone wrote: > > > > Can you point me at anything which documents how this could be possible? > > Asterisk was just one possibility of course. I don't know your case in > detai

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

On Tuesday 17 August 2021 at 21:55:15, Fred Posner wrote: > On 8/17/21 2:20 PM, Antony Stone wrote: > > If not, can anyone suggest something else which could sit in between a > > very basic SIP client and a PBX server, in order to inject these sorts > > of commands into the

Re: [SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

ld, transfer etc. If > the endpoint is a dumb sip softphone as you described? Because I can send commands in to some API telling kamailio to "send a REINVITE for call reference XXX"? > Original message > From: Antony Stone > Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021, 20:20

[SR-Users] Is this idea even feasible?

Hi. I'm looking for a solution to the following problem, and wondering whether Kamailio (with which I have very little experience so far) may be it, or whether I'm thinking in totally the wrong direction. The problem: I have a SIP client application which runs on a standard Linux system, and i

Re: [SR-Users] install latest sems-server on debian 10 buster

On Friday 06 August 2021 at 22:43:59, Mojtaba wrote: > Does anybody have experience installing the latest SEMS-Server (1.6.0) on > debian 10 buster? > I tried to install both 1.6.0. and 1.7-dev and some issues are occurred, Hm, maybe tell us what "issues" means? Antony. -- Angela Merkel arriv

Re: [SR-Users] Can Kamailio help with this?

On Friday 21 May 2021 at 17:04:21, Antony Stone wrote: > Well, I had at least expected to find some documentation on how to get it > doing something basic which is easy to test, but I'm still struggling to > find such guides. > > Maybe I have the wrong idea about what

Re: [SR-Users] Can Kamailio help with this?

On Friday 21 May 2021 at 16:53:40, Henning Westerholt wrote: > Hello Antony, > > as written before, Kamailio is from its design and setup targeted to many > different use cases. For certain use cases you find examples or tutorials > in our wiki. But if the example fits to your case, is mostly a m

Re: [SR-Users] Can Kamailio help with this?

On Friday 21 May 2021 at 16:54:49, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 5/21/21 10:30 AM, Antony Stone wrote: > > Is path header a common thing for PBXs to support or not support? > > It's common, since it's a standard. But it took some time to get > traction. Asterisk did not

Re: [SR-Users] Can Kamailio help with this?

t; On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 5:09 PM Antony Stone wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I think maybe I asked this question at a busy time, when people were > > dealing with other questions. > > > > Can anyone point me at the appropriate documentation on how to get > >

Re: [SR-Users] Can Kamailio help with this?

but I haven't yet found a simple guide. Thanks in advance. On Tuesday 18 May 2021 at 12:51:21, Antony Stone wrote: > On Saturday 15 May 2021 at 22:49:01, Mojtaba wrote: > > Absolutely yes, In Kamailio with specific module you could do it. Some > > related module fo

Re: [SR-Users] Can Kamailio help with this?

to a remote PBX - is a far more standard setup - where can I find configuration guidelines on how to do this, given that I've never implemented Kamailio so far? Thanks, > On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 5:52 PM Antony Stone wrote: > > Hi. > > > > I've been aware of

[SR-Users] Can Kamailio help with this?

Hi. I've been aware of Kamailio, and on this list, for several years, but so far I have not implemented Kamailio for any purpose. I wonder if it could be a suitable tool for the following scenario. I currently use Asterisk to register as a client, with username and password, to other SIP PBXs

Re: [SR-Users] cannot xlog messages into /var/log/syslog

On Sunday 02 May 2021 at 14:07:30, Abdulaziz Alghosh wrote: > i am a beginner with Kamailio Server and I am trying to get along with > Kamailio config file by logging some messages by xlog Module. xlog module > logs two already-written messages which had been delivered with the default > configura

Re: [SR-Users] unsubscribe list

On Friday 23 April 2021 at 15:22:22, Santanu B wrote: > where to unsubscribe list Either follow the URL which you quoted in your posting, or else look at the headers of the messages on the list (many mail clients will help you with this if you right-click on a message) Mailto:sr-users-requ..

Re: [SR-Users] [ANNOUNCE]: sipnagios, a Nagios Plugin to check Call Quality in SIP VoIP (compatible with checkmk, etc)

On Wednesday 21 April 2021 at 15:04:04, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Personally I do not need such feature (e.g., Zabbix), I was more curious > if there is sort of common plugin API between some of the monitoring > systems (like seems to be now for web browsers) -- if I am not wrong, > some o

Re: [SR-Users] please unsubscribe my email from the mail list, thank you

On Thursday 08 April 2021 at 16:39:50, Santanu B wrote: > please unsubscribe my email from the mail list, thank you As the headers of your own email (and every other one on this list) say: List-Unsubscribe: ,

Re: [SR-Users] Segmentation fault on debian 10

On Wednesday 03 March 2021 at 17:46:34, Bugaian A. Vitalie wrote: > Hello, > > fresh install on debian 10: > > Mar 3 11:42:16 teams01 kernel: [ 5771.292626] kamailio[1518]: segfault at > 0 ip 7f102bb5c206 sp 7ffec00096e8 error 4 in libc-2.28.so > [7f102bae6000+148000] > Mar 3 11:42:16

Re: [SR-Users] using kamailio 5.4 with the websocket or xmlhttprequest

On Wednesday 30 December 2020 at 15:15:19, Daniel Hermann N'don wrote: > Hello everyone, I'm a beginner in kamailio technology, and I would like to > know how to communicate with kamailio from the web. Please define "communicate". What are you trying to achieve? Antony. -- "Can you keep a sec

Re: [SR-Users] ACK Relay Issue Transaction Not Found

On Tuesday 24 November 2020 at 18:28:44, Alex Balashov wrote: > Hiddenly? :-) I like the word - I can think of several contexts it would be useful in, and the standard way of expressing the concept is so much less concise. Antony. -- Most people have more than the average number of legs.

Re: [SR-Users] (no subject)

On Monday 09 November 2020 at 11:06:42, ahmed moghazy wrote: > Hello, > When i make a call from specific user to another it didnt make call and it > gave missed call to another one after a minute so the call doesnot > complete i dont know why , Thank you. We don't know why either. Please give u

Re: [SR-Users] I want to get call info from kamailio

On Tuesday 29 September 2020 at 10:34:56, ahmed moghazy wrote: > Excuse me , > I want to get call info 1. This must be one of the most inefficiently-asked questions I have ever seen on a mailing list. After all, why send 305 bytes of text (or alternatively a 45 byte URL) when you can send 1,37

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio drop calls with Teams

On Thursday 20 August 2020 at 12:25:28, sip user wrote: > Hi, I'm connecting Teams with kamailio server. From Kamailio to teams I > have no problems, but from teams to Kamailio yes. Drop the call.. > #!KAMAILIO > #!define WITH_TLS > > event_route[tm:local-request] { > > if(is_method("O

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio-5.3.3. NAT and RTP not working

On Wednesday 24 June 2020 at 13:29:37, Pavithra Mohanraja wrote: > Hi , > > Could you please tell how to configure ipsec (general configuration not > related to kamailio). Surely this question is better asked on a Freeswan / Strongswan (or whatever name your operating system uses for its IPsec

Re: [SR-Users] forcing socket doesn't work for ACK

. > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 8:47 PM Antony Stone wrote: > > > > No, because (again, unless AWS works in some totally strange way that I > > can't imagine being the case) those two private IPs would be in different > > subnets, so only one is locally addressable by the

Re: [SR-Users] forcing socket doesn't work for ACK

On Monday 01 April 2019 at 21:38:21, David Villasmil wrote: > actually that's a good point, the default gateway. > But, ven if i have 2 different IPs, those 2 would still have direct contact > with the private IPs. No, because (again, unless AWS works in some totally strange way that I can't ima

Re: [SR-Users] forcing socket doesn't work for ACK

ublic connections would come in to a different IP on another interface which can route back to them. Someone with personal familiarity with AWS systems may be able to inject a more definite answer here. Antony. > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 8:17 PM Antony Stone wrote: > > > > Do you p

Re: [SR-Users] forcing socket doesn't work for ACK

No, but it might not be the right question to ask :) Do you prefer to ask "how can I make this strange networking setup operate?" or "how can I arrange my networking so that this service works?" Antony. > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 8:03 PM Antony Stone wrote: > > >

Re: [SR-Users] forcing socket doesn't work for ACK

ess (private or public)? Antony. > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 7:35 PM Antony Stone wrote: > > > > What is the purpose of this rather odd networking setup? -- The Magic Words are Squeamish Ossifrage.

Re: [SR-Users] forcing socket doesn't work for ACK

On Monday 01 April 2019 at 20:29:22, David Villasmil wrote: > Sergiu, > > I don't think mhomed will help in this case, since both sockets are able to > reach the endpoint. They are both on the same subnet. Why? What is the purpose of this rather odd networking setup? Antony -- "It would app

Re: [SR-Users] forcing socket doesn't work for ACK

On Monday 01 April 2019 at 17:37:45, David Villasmil wrote: > Hello guys, > I have public and private IPs, and i need to force the sending socket > replying to internal out externals endpoint > This works nicely, except for ACKs and potentially other packets sent > statelessly? > > Anyone knows

Re: [SR-Users] Compressing SIP messages

On Monday 01 April 2019 at 16:33:17, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: > Hi! > > Was looking on some way to compress SIP signalling between internal > servers. What problem are you trying to solve by compressing SIP? > But found out, there are no some pre-defined or recommended mechanism of > doing this. Y

Re: [SR-Users] core at kamailio 5.1.6

On Monday 10 December 2018 at 16:49:32, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > BTW, every time sending emails to you as a response from mailing lists > > results in errors to deliver, respectively: > > DNS Error: 11795256 DNS type 'mx' lookup of sonoc.cio responded with > > code NXDOMAIN Domain name

Re: [SR-Users] Dispatcher question

On Friday 31 August 2018 at 12:11:53, Igor Olhovskiy wrote: > Hi! > > I’m having some issues with dispatcher and cannot get why it’s not working > > Idea is to use ds_next_dst right after ds_select_dst > > I’m having it like this > > modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/tmp/dispatcher.list")

Re: [SR-Users] help

On Monday 20 August 2018 at 15:52:12, Pravin . wrote: > Herewith attaching the screenshot for the error we are getting after > issuing apt-get install mariadb-server command... 1. Have you ensured your repository index is up to date with "apt-get update" before trying to install? 2. Not related

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy or rtpengine with Kamailio and Asterisk

On Tuesday 14 August 2018 at 12:30:12, Wilkins, Steve wrote: > Good Morning everyone, > > Has anyone ever gotten rtpproxy/rtpengine to work with Kamailio and > Asterisk? > > I have tried both, and even though I see no errors with either, and when I > make calls I see rtpproxy/rtpengine traffic,

Re: [SR-Users] Regarding OpenSource Meetup in India

On Wednesday 08 August 2018 at 15:35:37, surendra tiwari wrote: > Hello Guys, > > We are having a Meetup for Telecommunication Geeks. When and where? > We are talking around Opensource Technology for building telecommunication > solution. > > Here's the agenda for our first meetup. We do have

Re: [SR-Users] kamalio in virtual environment

On Tuesday 31 July 2018 at 19:36:42, AL S wrote: > Hi, > > > Is recent kamalio release interoperable Interoperable with what? > in virtual environment? Why not? What reservations do you have about using Kamailio in a VM? Antony. -- If you were ploughing a field, which would you rather us

Re: [SR-Users] error in tls configuration in kamailio 5.1.3

On Thursday 31 May 2018 at 21:49:15, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > older versions of kamailio packages included self signed certificates, > but, afaik, the newer do not include as Debian imposed reproducible > builds. The certificate being generated at build time, was always > diff

Re: [SR-Users] Help me!

On Saturday 14 April 2018 at 17:47:43, Do Quang Trung wrote: > I use kamailio 5.1.1 with openssl-1.0.2n. I built openssl with gost engine > supported and the result when i list cipher list as follow: > > GOST2001-GOST89-GOST89:GOST94-GOST89-GOST89:ECDH-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:EC

Re: [SR-Users] Mailing addresses (was: rtpengine installation dependencies)

On Saturday 07 April 2018 at 14:38:18, Henning Westerholt wrote: > Am Samstag, 7. April 2018, 00:58:49 CEST schrieb Sergey Okhapkin: > > Please do not reply to the same mailing list (with 2 different names > > though) twice. One of aliases sr-users@lists.kamailio.org or > > sr-us...@lists.sip- ro

Re: [SR-Users] question

On Friday 02 March 2018 at 11:14:15, Syrine Riahi wrote: > bonjour > je suis une étudiante en mastère professionnel des systèmes des réseaux et > télécommunication j'ai choisie comme un sujet de mémoire mise en oeuvre de > solution des VoIP et après des grands recherches j'ai choisie comme > sol

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 5.1 compilation error

On Tuesday 27 February 2018 at 15:04:09, Aqs Younas wrote: > Greetings list, > > I am trying to install Kamailio 5.1 from source code on Debian 8.10. But It > is failing with below error. Don't know what could be wrong. Have you tried a Google search for "gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': ex

Re: [SR-Users] Dialplan Module

On Tuesday 05 September 2017 at 17:38:31, Nelson Migliaro wrote: > Hello, > > Do you know if its possible to Sometimes it is, yes :) Antony. -- Never automate fully anything that does not have a manual override capability. Never design anything that cannot work under degraded conditions in

Re: [SR-Users] newbie here

On Thursday 01 June 2017 16:45:15 Luís Torres wrote: > Hello all, > > just recently discover Kamailio and trying to improve > my asterisk boxes with it. Just want a simple thing to start: > > - load balancing Um, load balancing what? SIP registrations? Dial plan / call setup? Audio / call flow

Re: [SR-Users] How to debug Kamailio

On Friday 05 May 2017 at 15:34:39, Remsik,Robert wrote: > Hello! > > I've got a base install of Kamailio and I'm trying to have it forward > packets generated by sipsak to a different proxy (a migration of an > existing ruleset by opensips). I can get the Kamailio process started but > I can't f

Re: [SR-Users] How to prevent running multiple Kamailio instances on one host?

st not resolved by technical solutions. 2. How about renaming the "kamailio" binary and changing the init script to match, and if you like, creating a replacement for "kamailio" which simply tells people "don't do this again"? Antony. > On Thu

Re: [SR-Users] How to prevent running multiple Kamailio instances on one host?

On Thursday 27 April 2017 at 18:52:22, Julia Boudniatsky wrote: > What is you suggestion for prevent running multiple Kamailio instances on > one host? How are you getting these occurring by accident? Basically, you start Kamailio, and a Kamailio process is running - another one will only run i