https://www.kamailio.org/w/kamailio-v5-7-0-release-notes/
article references math module and tls_wolfssl, 2 of the 4 modules
mentioned link back to 5.6 (these two) instead of 5.7 resulting in a 404.
Respective links should be as follows:
math - https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.7.x/modules
Microsoft SIP" here.
>
> 2) Could it be that antisocial "Microsoft SIP" sends 400 as a way of
> objecting to something in the SDP, e.g. where a non-demented SIP stack
> would send "488 Not Acceptable Here" or "415 Unsupported Media Type"?
>
> I kn
--
>
> Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
>
> Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Brandon Armstead
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 29, 2022 7:52 PM
> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> *Subject:* [SR-Users] Re: Direct Routing,
"415 Unsupported Media Type"?
>
> I know you've said you tried multiple clients to rule that out, but I
> wonder if the thing it's objecting to hasn't been ruled out that way.
>
> 3) I saw this media line in the SDP:
>
>m=application 41356
>
&
ck
> would send "488 Not Acceptable Here" or "415 Unsupported Media Type"?
> >
> > I know you've said you tried multiple clients to rule that out, but I
> wonder if the thing it's objecting to hasn't been ruled out that way.
> >
> > 3) I
Outbound calls from my SBC into Teams (Polycom -> SBC -> Teams) always
result in a 400 BAD REQUEST.
Example invite below:
https://pastebin.com/F1G1Ce59
I've taken care to make sure numbers are all E.164 format in
From/To/Contact. I've also taken care to make sure that FQDN is used in
Contact and
Thanks for your time in advance!
When dealing with multiple headers in different formats, i.e.
Diversion: ,
$hdrc(Diversion) returns 1 header instead of 2. Is this expected
behavior? What is the best way to manage all scenarios of possible
multiple header values? It seems currently there is
Is there a similar hook to make kamailio dump its current configuration it
is reading including ... included files, i.e. similar to nginx -T
root@main:/home/brandon# nginx -h
nginx version: nginx/1.14.2
Usage: nginx [-?hvVtTq] [-s signal] [-c filename] [-p prefix] [-g
directives]
Options:
-
ontinued route. A few will doubtless
> exhibit quirky behaviour as the state doesn't make it across properly
> from the original requet_route. I haven't been adversely impacted by
> this in my extensive use of http_async_client(), however.
>
> On 11/2/20 8:42 PM, Brandon Ar
s i.e. msg_apply_changes is not
valid in the continued route.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:36 PM Alex Balashov
wrote:
> Correct, this is expected behaviour. Execution will continue in
> ROUTENAME instead of returning to the calling route.
>
> On 11/2/20 8:33 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote:
&
kamailio 5.5.0-dev3
I'm unsure if this is expected behavior, so thought I would ask...
When using http_async_query("URI", "ROUTENAME")
request_route {
route(AUTH);
# this does not get executed below route(AUTH)
xinfo("[$ci][$rm] we hit this line");
}
route[AUTH] {
t_newtran();
Nov 2 21:13:28 main kamailio[1331]: INFO:
Daniel,
In short kamcmd does not reflect the value set in $sht(server=>auth
::token)
It alternates between being set and not being set (reflecting in kamcmd
htable.dump
root@main:/etc/kamailio# kamcmd htable.dump server
{
entry: 11
size: 1
slot: {
{
name: auth::token
value:
{"data":{"t
going on here, 1) handling htable
in memory between htable-mod-init and htable:expired:server and 2) unable
to use http_async_client inside htable-mod:init. I've also double checked
that these modules are loaded after htable in kamailio config.
I look forward to hearing any input anyone may ha
Running 5.5.0-dev3
modparam("htable", "htable", "ipban=>size=8;autoexpire=300;dmqreplicate=1;")
modparam("htable", "enable_dmq", 1)
modparam("htable", "dmq_init_sync", 1)
modparam("htable", "timer_procs", 4)
modparam("htable", "timer_interval", 5)
modparam("htable", "db_expires", 1)
modparam("hta
t udphdr* uh,
>
>
>struct in_addr* src,
>
>
> struct in_addr* dst,
>
>
> unsigned short length)
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Henning
>
>
>
> --
>
> Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/
>
> Kamailio se
Has anyone seen this error while compiling 3.3.7
raw_sock.c:431: undefined reference to `udpv4_vhdr_sum'
system:
Linux 4.9.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.189-3 (2019-09-02) x86_64 GNU/Linux
lsmod:
Module Size Used by
bonding 147456 0
intel_rapl
4063-7921 ext. 6299
> Celular: 41 99921-7281
> Skype: diogodhh
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Em sex, 12 de jul de 2019 às 03:44, Brandon Armstead
> escreveu:
>
>> Are you looking for a digest validation or perhaps ip south based or
>> otherwise a header checksum etc ther
I would check signaling on both sides. Also any error logs? Kamailio?
Rtpproxy ?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:46 PM Gaurav Bmotra
wrote:
> no it just stuck and disconnected at client end
> in SIP logs it show the bye 200 after about 1 min after stuck
>
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 10:5
Are there any errors, is it an issue with signaling? Is it a normal
disconnect? Ie bye 200 etc or?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:14 PM Gaurav Bmotra
wrote:
> hi
> i m using kamailio 5.1.2 with ubuntu 18.4 LTS , and rtpproxy (Basic
> version: 20040107
> )
> we are using it for video calling everyt
Are you sure Linphone is not setting it? Get a trace from client side, for
some reason I’ve my doubts kamailio is defaulting to an ipv6 address.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:42 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have not set pua_reginfo parameter. Should I set it? And if yes to
> which value? There
Are you looking for a digest validation or perhaps ip south based or
otherwise a header checksum etc there are various ways you could accomplish
this.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:41 PM Diogo Hartmann wrote:
> Hello Kamailio experts,
>
> We were already able to register correctly at a SIP Provider
I would also say - implement your own routing logic / info shaking data you
wish to make sense of, then change debug level to lower value, change debug
level higher when actually reproducing and investigating a bug/issue.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 6:57 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
Ivan,
This is a very old reference. Check for msg_apply_changes() or some
such function as that. Route headers can be preloaded but does not
necessarily guarantee order, i.e. a proxy in the chain does not properly
loose_route or otherwise.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:43 AM Ivan Ribakov wrote:
UDP does not have any guaranteed state or order...
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:44 AM Duarte Rocha wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm having some problems with keeping the order of the messages in
> Kamailio.
>
> In some cases i'm receiving an ACK for the first INVITE and immediately
> after that a RE-INVI
Andrew,
Perhaps try something like this:
if(!($(ru{uri.param,ak}) == "")){
// ak has a value
} else {
// ak has no value
}
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:28 PM Brandon Armstead wrote:
> Andrew,
>
>I believe per docs it finds a param with no value, so it may not ma
21, 2019 at 1:28 PM Brandon Armstead wrote:
> Andrew,
>
>I believe per docs it finds a param with no value, so it may not match
> if there is a value on that attribute.
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:24 PM Andrew Chen wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Question.
Andrew,
I believe per docs it finds a param with no value, so it may not match
if there is a value on that attribute.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:24 PM Andrew Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Question. I'm executing uri_param() function to look for our customized
> Request-URI parameters generated b
I suspect you could check $rd or $du ? Although I don’t quite understand
why you won’t know the realm to begin with based on the selection?
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 03:59 Mack Hendricks wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> So, I want to use the UAC module to handle Digest Auth to upstream
> carriers. But, I d
Mike,
Your likely running into an issue where your changes are not actually
applied. Check out msg_apply_changes() or something of the such.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 6:52 AM Mike Montgomery
wrote:
> We have a situation where we get a redirect from a carrier with a list of
> carriers to send
Set a cookie and relay those subsequent transactions down to proper
endpoint that they initially went over.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:56 AM Phillman25 Kyriacou
wrote:
> Hi List!
>
> I currently have 3 Kamailio's (Version 5.1) in an ACTIVE-ACTIVE-ACTIVE
> scenario behind a load balancer all 3 nod
Err I'm sorry I didn't pay close enough attention to your int, the network
address for 192.168.100.100 would be ... 3232261220
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:10 AM Brandon Armstead wrote:
> Sorry for late reply - however ; yes -- if it will accept this int - i've
> not tried
om number.
>
> пн, 1 окт. 2018 г. в 16:52, Brandon Armstead :
>
>> You could try using network address for the ip?
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:48 AM Denys Pozniak
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I need to separate Kamailio's dmq_u
You could try using network address for the ip?
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:48 AM Denys Pozniak
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I need to separate Kamailio's dmq_usrloc by server_id and will be much
> easily if server_id can accept string values also, like:
> server_id="192.168.100.100"
>
> But currently it ac
Cody,
Kamailio should receive from normal TCP /
Kernel stack handoff - you may be able to do some tuning with sysctl -
however one alternate suggestion that could help spread load on actual
Kamailio TCP workers is by firing up additional workers on alternate ports
but this still would not ensu
.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> _______
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
--
Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead
CTO / CRYY.com
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
if(is_method(“INVITE”)){ .
sl_send_reply(“183”, “Ringing”);
}
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:44 PM 赵国杰 wrote:
> Hello guys,
> Is it possible for kamailio to initiate a 183 to caller?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Li
route... (as they were added in
> branch_route, maybe it works?)
>
> Not 100% sure though...
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> Thanks!
> Joel.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote:
>>
>> Why do you not remove the headers in request_route {
-ADAPTIVE_WAIT,
>> USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST,
>> HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
>> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
>> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
>> id: unknown
>> compiled with gcc 4.9.2
>>
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joel.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
--
Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead
CTO / CRYY.com
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Also t_check_status(“200”){
In onreply_route{
And handle there, looks like you have corrrct flag already
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:08 AM Brandon Armstead wrote:
> Check / try the flag to send no reply
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:07 AM Alex Balashov
> wrote:
>
>> Store
Check / try the flag to send no reply
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:07 AM Alex Balashov
wrote:
> Store what you want in AVPs save that instead?
>
> On October 2, 2017 8:05:05 AM EDT, Kristijan Vrban
> wrote:
> >2017-10-02 13:14 GMT+02:00 Alex Balashov :
> >
> >> Are you sure an onreply_route isn't w
m
> Dept **|**Pethahiah Rehoboth INTL. Limited* | *2nd Floor Rubby Block All
> seasons Plaza , Lateef Jakande Rd, Agidingbi, Ikeja, Lagos.* | *Mobile:**
> +2348052612001,+2348098797928 *|*Skype*: daptims |
> htttp://www.pethahiah.com
>
>
>
> *From:* sr-users [mailto:sr-users-
dir under used local src}
/usr/local/lib64/kamailio/kamctl essentially iirc.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 6:00 AM Brandon Armstead wrote:
> I would copy all of the kamctl files over not sure why entirely but I
> think there is s bug in the build process or maybe user error but I’ve ran
>
Rehoboth INTL. Limited* | *2nd Floor Rubby Block All
> seasons Plaza , Lateef Jakande Rd, Agidingbi, Ikeja, Lagos.* | *Mobile:**
> +2348052612001,+2348098797928 *|*Skype*: daptims |
> htttp://www.pethahiah.com
>
>
>
> *From:* sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org] *On
src/utils/kamctl
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:06 AM Brandon Armstead wrote:
> Make sure the kamctl files exist there as in the path in can’t locate if
> not copy them from I believe src/Uriel/kamctl to the desired path it is
> looking for and or symlink.
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at
Make sure the kamctl files exist there as in the path in can’t locate if
not copy them from I believe src/Uriel/kamctl to the desired path it is
looking for and or symlink.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:27 AM Timothy oladapo olawuyi <
dolaw...@pethahiah.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Please help me
Hello all,
I've checked the docs and did some brief searching, curious if
this transformation or method exists currently?
Such as:
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/comparison-operators.html#function_coalesce
Thanks!
--
Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead
CTO / CRY
Check data on wire between actual and expected ngrep or tcpdump... it looks
like your response is not a kamailio reply, yet web server returns the 400
/ response.
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:40 AM Abdul Basit wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I am using kamailio -v
> version: kamailio 5.0.2 (x86_64/linux)
48 matches
Mail list logo
