Hi!
I am working successfully with Kamailio in my lab setup where Kamailio is
the SBC for Asterisk.
The network layout is looking like this:
SIP-Phone <== PUBLIC NET ==> Kamailio (SBC) <== PRIVATE NET ==> Asterisk
<== PUBLIC NET ==> Carrier
Each public network is reachable from the internet and
via local interface only.
> PUBLIC NET SIP-Phone ==> Kamailio(PUBLIC) ==> FS(PUBLIC) ==> Kamailio
> (PUBLIC) ==> Carrier
>
>
> On 16 August 2018 at 12:57, Kevin Olbrich wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I am working successfully with Kamailio in my lab s
Sorry, following -> flowing.
Am Do., 16. Aug. 2018 um 12:32 Uhr schrieb Kevin Olbrich :
> Hi Dmitri,
>
> is RTP folowing to FS directly in this case? This would allow us to use
> STUN as well as ICE, etc. from Asterisk (which is currently the case
> without Kamailio SBC i
appreciate it. Thank you.
Kind regards,
Kevin
Am Do., 16. Aug. 2018 um 19:12 Uhr schrieb Henning Westerholt <
h...@kamailio.org>:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. August 2018, 11:57:03 CEST schrieb Kevin Olbrich:
> > I am working successfully with Kamailio in my lab setup where Kamailio is
Hi,
which debug tool is that in your screenshot?
Thank you very much!
Kevin
Am Mi., 22. Aug. 2018 um 18:47 Uhr schrieb Sergiu Pojoga :
> Why would the UAC need to 'whitelist' Asterisk?
>
> Here's an example of an inbound call from Asterisk to a UAC with a sip
> proxy in the middle.
> Notice h
Hi!
Which hostname do I need to request for the certificate when the
servers are load-balanced using DNS-SRV?
Do I need to get the cert for the DNS-SRV subdomain (without
_sip._tls) or for the servers, eg. server0{1,2,3}.pbx.example.com ?
Thank you!
Kevin
___
e in 99% and no any additional STUN/ICE are required
>
> On 16 August 2018 at 13:32, Kevin Olbrich wrote:
>
>> Hi Dmitri,
>>
>> is RTP folowing to FS directly in this case? This would allow us to use
>> STUN as well as ICE, etc. from Asterisk (which is currently the ca
>
> fix_nated_sdp("15");
>
>
Thank you very much! This works perfectly fine!
> Cheers!
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:46 PM Kevin Olbrich wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Sorry if you received an empty email, accidently clicked the send button
>> when r
Hi!
I noticed a minor problem when I set up the STUN config of my phone.
When the server is set, I am unable to reach the endpoint from kamailio
(Phone1 -> Kamailio -> Asterisk -> same Kamilio -> no outgoing SIP flow to
Phone2).
If I do not set it, it seems to fallback to it's RFC1918 address whic
Hi!
I read about the SCTP module for Kamailio and I am not sure if I should
load it (currently I am not).
Does this provide any benefit when Kamailio is used as proxy in front of
Asterisk?
At least from Wikipedia and the kamailio docs, it sounds like I can load it
and it does it's magic.
The mult
Hi!
The systemd kamailio.service file for debian (in my case, it's stretch) has
the following unit options set:
[Unit]
> Description=Kamailio (OpenSER) - the Open Source SIP Server
> After=network.target
It would be better to change this to:
[Unit]
> Description=Kamailio (OpenSER) - the Open S
> Also you may want change
> Restart=on-failure
>
Absolutely agree with this. Should I create a PR on GH for all three
changes?
Any concerns?
Kind regards
Kevin
> вт, 6 нояб. 2018 г. в 14:54, Kevin Olbrich :
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The systemd kamailio.service file for
no interest in brining the "Conflicts="-line to kamailio.
Kevin
>
> Kamailio is working fine with iptables and firewalld. Need only create
> appropriate rules.
> For firewalld you can create this rules and then create PR
>
>
>
> вт, 6 нояб. 2018 г. в 15:12,
Hi!
Can someone share his kamailio.cfg with working busy lamp field in a
kamailio-as-proxy scenario?
My config is based on the example shipped with 5.1.x and asterisk as the
backend.
Calling works fine but PUBLISH / SUBSCRIBE is handled by kamailio itself.
I am not sure but this might be the par
Hi!
I have a phone (Mitel 6930) that does not send an Expire-header but
"expire" in Contact during REGISTER:
Session Initiation Protocol (REGISTER)
> Request-Line: REGISTER sip:pbx.example.com SIP/2.0
> Message Header
> Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.6.16:5061;branch=;rp
e problem but verbose level 3
has too much info.
Kevin
> Cheers.
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 4:00 PM Kevin Olbrich wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have a phone (Mitel 6930) that does not send an Expire-header but
>> "expire" in Contact during REGISTER:
Am Di., 6. Nov. 2018 um 22:57 Uhr schrieb Henning Westerholt <
h...@kamailio.org>:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> you could control the time when the specific not-working phone send a
> REGISTER. Then you can enable the debugging for a few seconds during this
> time, and then deactivate it again. This should wor
> 'kamctl ul show'
>
Correct as well, endpoint is not listed there.
I will check if I can get debug from the phone.
Thank you very much!
Kevin
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 4:57 PM Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
>> Am Dienstag, 6. November 2018, 22:50:54 CET schrieb K
nce, lol
>
> You're welcome.
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 5:24 PM Kevin Olbrich wrote:
>
>> Am Di., 6. Nov. 2018 um 23:09 Uhr schrieb Sergiu Pojoga <
>> pojo...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> I would assume the phone sends multiple REGISTER requests with sa
binwalk -e 6930.st
- jffs2-root/fs_1/bin/linemgrSip will be of interest
security through obscurity
Kevin
Am Mi., 7. Nov. 2018 um 15:06 Uhr schrieb Kevin Olbrich :
> Hi!
>
> I have found the problem. It is indeed desired behaviour!
> Current FW is 5.1.0. I have now browsed the realeas
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/1716
Am Di., 6. Nov. 2018 um 20:48 Uhr schrieb Henning Westerholt <
h...@kamailio.org>:
> Am Dienstag, 6. November 2018, 13:11:49 CET schrieb Kevin Olbrich:
> > > Also you may want change
> > > Restart=on-failure
> &g
Hi!
What is the difference between topoh and topos?
I am using topoh which works fine without DB and only needs the mask_key to
be the same on the nodes.
Is there a benefit for using a DB and the topos module?
Kevin
Am Mo., 12. Nov. 2018 um 09:24 Uhr schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
mico...@gm
Hi!
I am implementing forwarding of SUBSCRIBE (BLF) to an Asterisk behind Kamailio.
This works but Kamailio is not requesting for Auth.
I then added SUBSCRIBE to:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/etc/kamailio.cfg#L746
And it now challenges the client correctly.
Why does this lin
I rolled back the change and Kamailio still sends the challenge. Seems
I took the wrong transaction during debug...
Am Mo., 18. März 2019 um 19:16 Uhr schrieb Kevin Olbrich :
>
> Hi!
>
> I am implementing forwarding of SUBSCRIBE (BLF) to an Asterisk behind
> Kamailio.
> This
Hi!
Are there any Kamailio books?
I am still struggling with Kamailio on scenarios that need more then
REGISTER-offloading (like Kamailio cluster with BLF, custom NOTIFY,
DMQ, etc.).
Online docs are very limited or use Kamailio as a single tenant PBX.
What I need is a high available and high perf
t;fetch_rows", 1000)
# - pua_dialoginfo params -
modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "include_callid", 1)
modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "send_publish_flag", FLT_DLGINFO)
modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "caller_confirmed", 0)
modparam(&qu
> This email and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received this
> in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the
> information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this
> message may contain personal views which are not the views o
Hi again!
Any hints? Has someone tested these modules with Kamailio 5.2?
Thank you
Kevin
Am Di., 19. März 2019 um 16:40 Uhr schrieb Kevin Olbrich :
>
> Hi Henning,
>
> thank you! I will check that again.
>
> In the mean time, I tried to get this running:
>
Am Mi., 20. März 2019 um 19:28 Uhr schrieb Henning Westerholt
:
>
> Am Dienstag, 19. März 2019, 16:40:23 CET schrieb Kevin Olbrich:
> > thank you! I will check that again.
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> I don't understand your problem or question, sorry.
>
> Is the Digest A
Am Mi., 20. März 2019 um 20:01 Uhr schrieb Henning Westerholt
:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2019, 19:48:00 CET schrieb Kevin Olbrich:
> > > Am Dienstag, 19. März 2019, 16:40:23 CET schrieb Kevin Olbrich:
> > > > thank you! I will check that again.
> > >
Hi!
I need to customize the content of the NOTIFY sent by presence_dialoginfo.
How can I change the message before it is sent?
Kind regards
Kevin
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mai
those for presence dialog info) inside
> event_route[tm:local-request] { ... }. It should be possible to do a
> bunch of operations there to update that requests.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 24.03.19 00:26, Kevin Olbrich wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I need to
Hi!
I set up a proxy in front of an asterisk server to handle registration and
similar.
This setup needs topology hiding. I enabled and configured TOPOH which is
working well.
The only header which leaks network details is "To". It lists the proxys
internal IP.
Sure, a proxy should not alter the
e same way as ignore_early_media=true,
but it also sends 180 to the inbound leg when the first 183 is caught.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards,
Kevin Olbrich.
(mobil vom iPhone)
--
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen.
Wenn Sie nicht der richtig
Oh, sorry, wrong ML!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / best regards,
Kevin Olbrich.
(mobil vom iPhone)
--
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen.
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind und/oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich
erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte
Hi!
Regarding the service file:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/system_administrators_guide/sect-managing_services_with_systemd-unit_files
... the /etc/systemd/system/ directory is reserved for unit files created
or *customized *by the system administ
36 matches
Mail list logo
