[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio hangs on get_profile_size method.

HI, Could someone please respond? It would be greatly appreciated. On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 9:06 AM satyaprakash ch < chiramchetty.satyaprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > HI, > > We are facing a hang issue with Kamailio for the get_profile_size method. > Randomly, the Kamailio got

[SR-Users] Kamailio hangs on get_profile_size method.

HI, We are facing a hang issue with Kamailio for the get_profile_size method. Randomly, the Kamailio got hangs, and the CPU went 100%. During the hanging time, we generated the TRAP and we could see that the hang happened on the get_profile_size method. We are getting this hang randomly in dlg_pro

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio hang Issue

anging processes, refer > e.g. to: > > https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2015-September/090121.html > > > > Cheers, > > > > Henning > > > > -- > > Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ > > Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com > &

[SR-Users] Kamailio hang Issue

Hi, We are encountering a hang issue after deploying the following code: *route(DLG_MANAGE);* *if ($dlg_var(voip_id) == $null) {$dlg_var(voip_id) = $hdr(X-Voip-ID);}route[DLG_MANAGE] {if (is_method("INVITE")) { dlg_manage();}}* This code includes the set_dialog_profile. We

[SR-Users] Assistance Needed to Resolve Duplicate Contact Headers in 200 OK Response

Hi We are receiving 2 to 3 contact headers in the 200 OK response of the registration request. It appears that the `user_location` is updating multiple contact headers for the same extension due to network disconnections. Please suggest a solution to avoid duplicates in the `user_location` module,

[SR-Users] How to set "set_dialog_profile" value for Leg-a and leg-b.

Hi, We are using kamailio and freeswitch, So when we make a call from A to B the call is going via "kamailio -> freeswitch" and "freeswitch -> kamailio". Please suggest me how i can set "set_dialog_profile" for both legs with unique value in kamailio config file. Thanks. _

[SR-Users] Re: Compatibility issue between proxy and registrar

ct role is > not mentioned. > If this is the case, you could do some kamcmd ul.dump on both registrars. > Also the DMQ traffic can be traced by tcpdump etc. > > You may also want to validate the DMQ bus, "the way each node learns about > the other ones." > > On Th

[SR-Users] Compatibility issue between proxy and registrar

Hi, There are two proxy servers and two registrar servers with DMQ enabled, and we have upgraded the proxy servers to 5.7.4 and the registrar servers to 5.5.5. Kamailio proxy version 5.7.4 Kamailio registrar version: 5.5.5 Following the upgrade of the proxy server to 5.7.4, calls are not working

[SR-Users] Re: Kamailio crash due to UDP receiver child (kamailio 5.5.5)

ts.kamailio.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> >> the usual suggestion is to first upgrade to a supported version, as 5.5.x >> is end of life. Please upgrade to e.g. 5.8.1 version. You will need >> probably a bit of kamailio cfg adaptions and maybe so

[SR-Users] compile without downtime

HI I currently have two proxy servers running in my environment, and I want to upgrade Kamailio from version 5.4.7 to 5.6. Can I recompile the Kamailio service before restarting it without downtime ? Will there be any impact on my production environment if I recompile Kamailio to the newer versio

[SR-Users] Kamailio crash due to UDP receiver child (kamailio 5.5.5)

Hi, The kamailio version we are using is "5.5.5", We are facing a kamailio crash issue recently and it has generated the core-dump. Based on the core-dump analysis we could see that "*si_desc = "udp receiver child=3" *getting crashed. We could see the below error in the core-dump trace, #22 0x000

[SR-Users] Urgent: High CPU Load and MySQL Connection Issue on Kamailio Proxy Server

Hi, We're encountering a CPU load of approximately 90% on the Kamailio proxy server. Additionally, there's an error logged indicating a lost connection to MySQL. Could this indicate a problem with the configuration file or is it related to MySQL itself? Your guidance would be appreciated. MySQL v

[SR-Users] 412 issue

Hi, Does the below link issue is improved in updated version of Kamailio, Or kindly anyone help on this 412 issue? Link - https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2048 Thanks. __ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions

[SR-Users] Re: 412 Conditional request failed

Hi, Please anyone can reply on the issue of 412 conditional request failed. On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:49 PM satyaprakash ch < chiramchetty.satyaprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > There were two PUBLISH requests were sent by the Kamailio Proxy server to > the Kamail

[SR-Users] 412 Conditional request failed

Hi There were two PUBLISH requests were sent by the Kamailio Proxy server to the Kamailio Presence server. Processing of the first PUBLISH request resulted in the presentity table being updated - the "etag" changed from "a.1705053846.16611.21.1" to "a.1705053846.16613.23.2" Processing of the sec

[SR-Users] Re: Proxy Inactivity and Kamailio Log Disruption Issue.

be my first checks. > > Specifically - "ds_probing_threshold" and the "ds_inactive_threshold" > params (first takes it out after x failed, second adds it back in after x > successful.) We would need to see the kamailio version, dispatcher params > and the d

[SR-Users] Proxy Inactivity and Kamailio Log Disruption Issue.

HI, Scenario: We possess 2 proxies and 2 registrar servers equipped with dmq functionality. Unexpectedly, one of the Proxy IP addresses was marked as inactive (FLAG: IP) in the dispatcher list, causing the proxy to cease responding. Simultaneously, Kamailio logs stopped recording any activity.

[SR-Users] Re: Inquiry Regarding Kamailio Behavior and Drop Requests

ice applies: take traces and logs, and correlate them. > > > Also I have another query, For these drop requests, How do we > acknowledge in kamailio? > What do you mean, exactly? > > James > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 13:11, satyaprakash ch > wrote: > > >

[SR-Users] Re: Inquiry Regarding Kamailio Behavior and Drop Requests

Hi, Also I have another query, For these drop requests, How do we acknowledge in kamailio? On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 6:40 PM satyaprakash ch < chiramchetty.satyaprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply, > > When I was testing, I found the below log. >

[SR-Users] Re: Inquiry Regarding Kamailio Behavior and Drop Requests

> > > -Original Message- > > From: James Browne via sr-users > > Sent: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2023 17:55 > > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > > Cc: satyaprakash ch ; James Browne > > > > Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Inquiry Regardin

[SR-Users] Re: ERROR: run_top_route

uot;serial"); > $tu = $ru; > if (!t_relay()) >drop; // or exit > } > -- > *De :* satyaprakash ch > *Envoyé :* vendredi 13 octobre 2023 13:43 > *À :* Patrick Karton > *Cc :* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] ERROR: run_top_rout

[SR-Users] Re: Inquiry Regarding Kamailio Behavior and Drop Requests

Hi, Any reply would be appreciated. On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:10 PM satyaprakash ch < chiramchetty.satyaprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We possess a code within Kamailio, which specifically handles malformed > SIP responses. Below is the code snippet: > > > >

[SR-Users] Inquiry Regarding Kamailio Behavior and Drop Requests

Hi, We possess a code within Kamailio, which specifically handles malformed SIP responses. Below is the code snippet: *reply_routeCopy code if(!sanity_check("17604", "6")) { xlog("Malformed SIP response from $si:$sp\n"); drop;* Additionally, we have Kamailio drop request statistics as follow

[SR-Users] Re: ERROR: run_top_route

ave this. remove this > instruction* > > > *return *route[ANOTHER_ROUTE] *// <-- or you have this flavour . > remove the return instruction.* > > > } > > > you should remove any *return *instruction present in *faillure_route*. > its not useful to have a r

[SR-Users] Re: ERROR: run_top_route

Hi, Thanks for the reply, What if we would get a negative value, Do we need to change any code level, Will you please suggest what we need to do to resolve this? Waiting for your reply. On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:45 AM satyaprakash ch < chiramchetty.satyaprak...@gmail.com> wrote:

[SR-Users] Re: ERROR: run_top_route

e in this failure_route > -- > *De :* satyaprakash ch via sr-users > *Envoyé :* mercredi 27 septembre 2023 06:45 > *À :* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Cc :* satyaprakash ch > *Objet :* [SR-Users] ERROR: run_top_route > > Hi, > > We a

[SR-Users] ERROR: run_top_route

Hi, We are having an error in the Kamailio logs which we need to resolve this issue, ERROR is ::* /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10149]: ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:1081]: run_failure_handlers(): error running run_top_route for failure handler.* We are getting this error at the time of the 3xx response, Can

[SR-Users] Re: sr-users Digest, Vol 218, Issue 16

Hi Please find some more before and after, Ip address and number is masked FYI. INFO:

[SR-Users] Need an error description

Hi, Can anyone help me with the error why can we get this? ERROR: tm [tm.c:1752]: _w_t_relay_to(): t_forward_noack failed ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:1081]: run_failure_handlers(): error running run_top_route for failure handler Thank you. __ Kama

[SR-Users] Re: issue in kamailio of udp

t; > -- > > Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ > > Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com > > > > *From:* satyaprakash ch > *Sent:* Donnerstag, 6. April 2023 09:39 > *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Subject:* [SR-Users] Re: issue in kamailio of udp

[SR-Users] Re: issue in kamailio of udp

, Awaiting any reply for this..! On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 11:23 PM satyaprakash ch < chiramchetty.satyaprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I had upgraded Kamailio from 5.4.7 to 5.5.5, Then I restarted the Kamailio > service. > > After upgradation im getting the below error, > >

[SR-Users] issue in kamailio of udp

Hi, I had upgraded Kamailio from 5.4.7 to 5.5.5, Then I restarted the Kamailio service. After upgradation im getting the below error, /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[21754]: ERROR: [core/udp_server.c:596]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f7502289200, len: 61012, 0, dst: ( 10.122.45.189:5080), tolen:

[SR-Users] Removing the dmq list entry in version 5.4.7.

Hi Team, I need a help to remove the dmq list entry from the kamailio, I have executed the command *kamcmd dmq.list_nodes, below is the output*{ host: xx.xx.xx.xx port: 5080 resolved_ip: xx.xx.xx.xx status: active last_notification: 0 local: 0 } { host: yy.yy.yy.yy port: 5060 resolved_ip: yy.yy.y

Re: [SR-Users] Uneven-distribution of calls

; Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ > > Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com > > > > *From:* satyaprakash ch > *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2022 8:29 AM > *To:* Henning Westerholt > *Cc:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: [SR-Use

Re: [SR-Users] Uneven-distribution of calls

ck. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Henning > > > > -- > > Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ > > Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com > > > > *From:* satyaprakash ch > *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2022 7:22 AM > *To:* Henning

Re: [SR-Users] Uneven-distribution of calls

gt; > > Cheers, > > > > Henning > > > > -- > > Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ > > Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com > > > > *From:* sr-users *On Behalf Of > *satyaprakash > ch > *Sent:* Thursday, November 10, 2022 12:48 AM &

[SR-Users] Uneven-distribution of calls

Hi, what would be the reason for the *Un-even* distribution of calls from kamailio proxy to freeswitches. The dispatcher lists are having the same weight. For example: If we are having 4 freeswitches, the calls are evenly distributing for 3 freeswitches but there is high calls for the 4th freeswi

[SR-Users] Mysql.sock

Hi Team, I want to know this reason - why kamailio only can connect to mysql using */tmp/mysql.sock * and why it can’t use /run/mysql/mysql.sock Thanks and