-
>>> From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com>
>>> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>,
>>> "Andrew Pogrebennyk" <apogreben...@sipwise.com>
>>> Sent: Frida
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <mico...@gmail.com>
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>, "Andrew
Pogrebennyk" <apogreben...@sipwise.com>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 9:48:29
...@gmail.com>
To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>,
"Andrew Pogrebennyk" <apogreben...@sipwise.com>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 9:48:29 AM
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] 183 acc records even if early_media equals to 0
On 10.1
On 10.11.17 09:42, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
> On 11/10/2017 09:34 AM, Marco Capetta wrote:
>> +
>> if(relayed_msg->REPLY_STATUS==uas_rb->activ_type) {
>> +
>> run_trans_callbacks_with_buf( TMCB_RESPONSE_OUT,
On 11/10/2017 09:34 AM, Marco Capetta wrote:
> +
> if(relayed_msg->REPLY_STATUS==uas_rb->activ_type) {
> +
> run_trans_callbacks_with_buf( TMCB_RESPONSE_OUT, uas_rb, t->uas.request,
> +
Hi Daniel,
due to other internal patches, the line number are a bit different.
The issue seems located at the point where the patch was applied:
--- a/modules/tm/t_reply.c
+++ b/modules/tm/t_reply.c
@@ -1965,8 +1965,10 @@ enum rps relay_reply( struct cell *t, st
if
Thanks.
Patch applied on the test system with kamailio 4.4.6.
Just for documentation, an additional difference with 5.X is that
variable "TMCB_NONE_F" is called "relayed_code".
I will leave the system running and I let you know if the issue is solved.
Thanks
Marco
On 11/09/2017 04:18 PM,
Forgot to add that for branch 4.4, the changes should be for line 1952
in modules/tm/t_reply.c
On 09.11.17 16:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> I just pushed to master, here is the link to the diff:
>
> -
>
I just pushed to master, here is the link to the diff:
-
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/785a3ccc743f429107c3dfae78d43705918aa4e6.diff
It will help to see if what I found was the source for the issue. If
yes, there might be another patch to have a proper handling of the
situation.
Yes, I have a test system where I can deploy the patch.
Thank you very much
Marco
On 11/09/2017 03:09 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Are you able to reproduce as you need in a testbed or so? I may have a
small patch and wondering if you would be able to test?
Cheers,
Daniel
On
Are you able to reproduce as you need in a testbed or so? I may have a
small patch and wondering if you would be able to test?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 09.11.17 14:32, Marco Capetta wrote:
> I have the same issue on 4.4.5 and 4.4.6
>
> Thanks
> Marco
>
> On 11/09/2017 02:22 PM, Daniel-Constantin
I have the same issue on 4.4.5 and 4.4.6
Thanks
Marco
On 11/09/2017 02:22 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
One more thing, have you seen it in latest versions from branch 4.4.x?
Or was it on 4.4.1 only? Or from other perspective, on which versions
you noticed this kind of issues?
One more thing, have you seen it in latest versions from branch 4.4.x?
Or was it on 4.4.1 only? Or from other perspective, on which versions
you noticed this kind of issues?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 09.11.17 14:02, Marco Capetta wrote:
> Thank Daniel.
>
> Cheers
> Marco
>
> On 11/09/2017 12:38 PM,
Thank Daniel.
Cheers
Marco
On 11/09/2017 12:38 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
I expect that the code value is taken from status of the transaction,
which at that time has 200ok ranked with more priority. I will check
the code and if it proves to be this case, I will come up
Hello,
I expect that the code value is taken from status of the transaction,
which at that time has 200ok ranked with more priority. I will check the
code and if it proves to be this case, I will come up with a fix.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 09.11.17 10:42, Marco Capetta wrote:
> Hello,
>
> no we
Hello,
On 09.11.17 09:50, Marco Capetta wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm facing a strange problem with the call accounting module: even if
> in my configuration I have the parameter:
> modparam("acc", "early_media", 0)
> I can find some ACC records with sip_code 180 or 183.
>
>
> I investigated
Dear All,
I'm facing a strange problem with the call accounting module: even if in
my configuration I have the parameter:
modparam("acc", "early_media", 0)
I can find some ACC records with sip_code 180 or 183.
I investigated those cases and this issue seems to happen when an
endpoint
17 matches
Mail list logo
