Re: [SR-Users] Authentication: Is it possible to ignore realm? How to avoice unnecessary challenge because of changed realm?

2022-11-01 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Hi Henning > what about just using the approach in the documentation and example cfg, take > the from domain as realm for the challenge? This is what I am doing now, tentatively... The Issue with this, is that we have an SBC in front of Kamailio, that uses the R-URI domain of the initial

Re: [SR-Users] Authentication: Is it possible to ignore realm? How to avoice unnecessary challenge because of changed realm?

2022-11-01 Thread Henning Westerholt
Hello, what about just using the approach in the documentation and example cfg, take the from domain as realm for the challenge? Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com -Original Message- From: sr-users On Behalf Of

[SR-Users] Authentication: Is it possible to ignore realm? How to avoice unnecessary challenge because of changed realm?

2022-11-01 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Hi As mentioned in the last email, we have a CPE which adds credentials to any request so I would like to validate them. We use $rd as realm. Let's use example.com as example. During the initial INVITE, this works as expected. I try to only show the headers I think are relevant to the issue I