[SR-Users] Bogus event 8 in state 1 for dlg

2018-08-17 Thread Phillman25 Kyriacou
Hi! I keep receiving the below logs on Kamailio: CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:955]: log_next_state_dlg(): bogus event 8 in state 1 for dlg 0x7f59862cd440 [3685:10496] I understand that state 1 indicates an unconfirmed dialog, can anyone tell me what bogus event 8 is? The following is the call f

Re: [SR-Users] Bogus event 8 in state 1 for dlg

2018-08-17 Thread Henning Westerholt
Am Freitag, 17. August 2018, 12:45:15 CEST schrieb Phillman25 Kyriacou: > CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_hash.c:955]: log_next_state_dlg(): bogus event 8 in > state 1 for dlg 0x7f59862cd440 [3685:10496] > > I understand that state 1 indicates an unconfirmed dialog, can anyone tell > me what bogus event 8 i

Re: [SR-Users] Bogus event 8 in state 1 for dlg

2018-08-17 Thread Phillman25 Kyriacou
Thank you so much for your prompt reply and explanation Henning! Yes the calls are not affected so ill just ignore these messages. Thanks again! Phillip On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Henning Westerholt wrote: > Am Freitag, 17. August 2018, 12:45:15 CEST schrieb Phillman25 Kyriacou: > > CRIT

Re: [SR-Users] Bogus event 8 in state 1 for dlg

2018-08-17 Thread Dmitri Savolainen
> > an in-dialog OPTIONS is not normal, it should be not required for the > normal > call-flow. > i'v seen many in-dialog OPTIONS for checking is dialog alive, but only after INVITE-OK-ACK handshake. On 17 August 2018 at 14:10, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: > Thank you so much for your prompt repl

Re: [SR-Users] Bogus event 8 in state 1 for dlg

2018-08-17 Thread Henning Westerholt
Am Freitag, 17. August 2018, 13:20:39 CEST schrieb Dmitri Savolainen: > > an in-dialog OPTIONS is not normal, it should be not required for the > > normal > > call-flow. > > i'v seen many in-dialog OPTIONS for checking is dialog alive, but only > after INVITE-OK-ACK handshake. Hi Dimitri, you ar