Hello!
I'd like to implement the following diagram:
Users -> Internet -> Kamailio -> Asterisk
1. Kamailio has no own users, it just re-writes headers and re-send
REGISTER messages to Asterisk where usres are located.
2. Depending on Astersisk's answers Kamailio either form UL (using
original
Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio as SBC
Hello!
I'd like to implement the following diagram:
Users -> Internet -> Kamailio -> Asterisk
1. Kamailio has no own users, it just re-writes headers and re-send
REGISTER messages to Asterisk where usres are located.
2. Depending on Aster
To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> Sent: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 3:28 AM
> Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio as SBC
>
> Hello!
>
> I'd like to implement the following diagram:
>
> Users -> Internet -> Kamailio -> Asterisk
>
> 1. Kamailio has no own users, it just
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ellad Yatsko
> > To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> > Sent: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 3:28 AM
> > Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio as SBC
> >
> > Hello!
> >
>
7, Alex Balashov пишет:
>>> I hate to plug my own articles, but in this case it might help:
>>>
>>> http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/kamailio-as-an-sbc-five-years-on/
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
>>>
&
On 10/22/18 10:21 AM, Ellad Yatsko wrote:
May you help?.. :-)
Kind regards,
Ellad
Not sure if you're looking for someone to do the work for you, in which
case, I'd recommend the business list.
The concepts you're looking for here are covered in a variety of modules
that you can integrate
You may want to look at the pipelimit module for rate limiting as well.
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
ilio-as-an-sbc-five-years-on/
--
Sent from mobile. Apologies for brevity and errors.
-Original Message-
From: Ellad Yatsko
To: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Sent: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 3:28 AM
Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio as SBC
Hello!
I'd like to implement the following diagram:
Users
t;>> Kamailio (in the middle) because I heard it highly effective in the
>>>> point
>>>> of view of heavy loads. Asterisk might not bear a "tons" of SIP
>>>> requests
>>>> (dialogs).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
&
t FRAUD/BruteForce protection of my
> >>>> Asterisk using
> >>>> Kamailio (in the middle) because I heard it highly effective in the
> >>>> point
> >>>> of view of heavy loads. Asterisk might not bear a "tons" of SIP
> >>&
gt;>> answers of
> > >>>> Upstream
> > >>>> SIP-Server, make decision about attacks and PROXY RTP. It should be
> > >>>> more
> > >>>> clear
> > >>>> definition what I would like to achieve.
>
> UL. It should not BALANCE, just forward SIP traffic, ANALYZE
>>>>>> answers of
>>>>>> Upstream
>>>>>> SIP-Server, make decision about attacks and PROXY RTP. It should be
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> clear
>&g
;>> questions:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - can my "vision" be completed?
>>>>>>> - how can it be implemented?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The major problem as I see is to modify algorithm so Kam
t;> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 04:40:03PM +0300, Ellad Yatsko wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Dear Alex,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> your article is just "general words". :-) There is a couple of
> >&
Hello,
I read https://skalatan.de/en/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams and trying to use
kamailio for teams.
But I faced that MS not responding ACK to my 200OK. Somethin is wrong, but
I don't know what. I call from teams to kamailio.
Can you help me please
This is initial INVITE from Teams:
2020/04/09 22:5
Hi Aydar,
Request from MS proxy has VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.7.24:5061, that's where
your reply should go. You're sending to 52.114.7.24:1024 instead?
Also, looks like you're missing "r2=on" on the other RR, only one has it.
Cheers,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:09 AM Aidar Kamalov
wrote:
> Hello
Thanks for the answer, I have disabled forse_rport() for Teams side,
responses now going to address in Via header, but it is not resolved my
issue, no ACK from Teams :(
чт, 9 апр. 2020 г. в 18:22, Sergiu Pojoga :
> Hi Aydar,
>
> Request from MS proxy has VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.7.24:5061, that's
You have too many RR of Kamailio, x1 FQDN, x3 IP. Why?
IMO, you should have only 2 of Kamailio, if you're doing transport
conversion. Both FQDNs + ";r2=on". MS clearly says FQDN everywhere, no IP,
especially RR
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:06 AM Aidar Kamalov
wrote:
> Thanks for the answer, I have
I thought they look only at first RR field?
пт, 10 апр. 2020 г. в 17:03, Sergiu Pojoga :
> You have too many RR of Kamailio, x1 FQDN, x3 IP. Why?
>
> IMO, you should have only 2 of Kamailio, if you're doing transport
> conversion. Both FQDNs + ";r2=on". MS clearly says FQDN everywhere, no IP,
> e
You're likely referring to this:
*Priority 1. Top-level Record-Route. If the top-level Record-Route contains
the FQDN name or IP, the FQDN name or IP is used to make the outbound
in-dialog connection.*
Like with many Microsoft products, nobody knows precisely what they expect.
To make matters wor
Contact:
Again, MS says it expects FQDN in Contact.
If you are re-writing the Contact received from
ENDPOINT_BEHIND_KAMAILIO_IP, then I suggest you don't, it's sufficient to
have FQDN in RR. This isn't a "[certified] SBC", if it was like MS says -
it shouldn't work at all with a proxy like Kamai
Hi,
Like in Hennings howto described if the front facing Kamailio used the FQDN
names in contact and so one it works.
And the "must be an certified sbc" is an marketing foo and for support
cases they can say "go-to your sbc vendor" imho.
I had this setup up and running.
Kind regards
Karsten Hor
The FQDN must be in the Contact of the OPTIONS request that is used for the
trunk keep alive. No need to mess up with the Contact header for in dialog
requests/replies.
However, the FQDN must be in the Record-Route header facing MS for in
dialog requests/replies.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Fri, Apr 1
Hello,
I have created a "How-To" blog post on using Kamailio as "session border
controller" for Microsoft Teams Direct Routing:
https://skalatan.de/de/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams
You can this way use all the existing possibilities that Kamailio provide to
interact with MS Teams as well.
Best rega
Hello,
thanks for sharing! This can be added as a news article on kamailio.org,
over the time can be found easier there than in the mailing list archive...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 28.10.19 17:21, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have created a “How-To” blog post on using Kamailio as “s
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio as SBC for Microsoft Teams
Hello,
thanks for sharing! This can be added as a news article on kamailio.org, over
the time can be found easier there than in the mailing list archive...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 28.10.19 17:21, Henning Westerholt wrote:
Hello,
I have
Hi Henning,
This is a great article, thanks for sharing. I'm wondering if you've
experimented with the possibility of integration of presence/dialog
information with teams as well?
Pretty much every integration guide I've seen on MS's UC solutions,
including the previous ones (Lync, Communicato
Pretty nice article.
Thanks in advance.
rgds,
Loi Dang Thanh
Phone : +84. 774.735.448
Email : loi.dangth...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 2:55 PM Rhys Hanrahan
wrote:
> Hi Henning,
>
>
> This is a great article, thanks for sharing. I'm wondering if you've
> experimented with the possibilit
Hello Rhys,
thanks. About the presence integration question - according to my research
currently the only possibility would be to use the existing Skype APIs and then
use this (per interop-mode) also in MS Teams.
Microsoft announced the availability of a API to set the presence status also
for
Hi Henning,
nice to see that howto. Thanks.
Maybe interesting for the list - i try to verify the ms-teams calls with
tls and use the permission module functions as "helper":
# account only INVITEs
if (is_method("INVITE")) {
setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting
Great addition, thanks Karsten!
Am 30.10.19 um 08:08 schrieb Karsten Horsmann:
Hi Henning,
nice to see that howto. Thanks.
Maybe interesting for the list - i try to verify the ms-teams calls with tls
and use the permission module functions as "helper":
# account only INVITEs
if
Hi list
Sorry for coming back to this older thread.
First: Thank you Henning for your blog post.
Does anyone know what is needed to get Kamailio listed on the certified
SBC's at microsoft?
Is there already a plan to get Kamailio on this list?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/dir
Hi, I think it's not needed/able to get kamailio listed as certified SBC by
Microsoft because the configuration is raw and flexible.
The `How-to` is just about the SIP stuffs fulfilling Microsoft's
requirements for the connectivity.
Your request should be valid with some GUI project that wrapping t
Hi, I know they have a few customisations to SIP and RTP.
Nothing concerning from what I know.
One example the SDP RTCP address, I do not have the RFC on top of my head.
But the certification is probably only needed for them yo list you as a
certified equipment, etc.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019, 01:5
AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Cc: sr-...@lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio as SBC for Microsoft Teams
Hi list
Sorry for coming back to this older thread.
First: Thank you Henning for your blog post.
Does anyone know what is needed to get Kamailio listed on the cer
35 matches
Mail list logo
