Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio topoh and t_check_trans not working.

2018-10-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, not sure about what you mean with "the same call scenario but with mask call ID disabled it works correctly". Initially you said about t_check_trans(): "once that the BYE belongs to an existing dialog it must return true". Again, this is not something t_check_trans() does, only if you

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio topoh and t_check_trans not working.

2018-10-16 Thread José Seabra
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the clarification regarding to the t_check_trans. Kamailio only receives one BYE, pls note that in the same call scenario but with mask call ID disabled it works correctly. we are using the default kamailio script, we just included the topoh module on it. Thank you for

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio topoh and t_check_trans not working.

2018-10-16 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, t_check_trans() is checking if there is a retransmission, not if a request belongs to a dialog. Did you get the same BYE sent twice at more or less same time? Cheers, Daniel On 16.10.18 18:00, José Seabra wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that using the module TOPOH with the parameter mask

[SR-Users] Kamailio topoh and t_check_trans not working.

2018-10-16 Thread José Seabra
Hi all, I noticed that using the module TOPOH with the parameter mask call id enabled and the t_check_trans together isn't working correctly. When i receive the BYE message my script call the function t_check_trans() in order to check if a message belongs or is related to a transaction. This