[SR-Users] Multiple FreeSWITCH servers behind kamailio-websocket

2017-06-07 Thread Karsten Horsmann
Hello List, is there any howto about webrtc loadbalance in combination with kamailio and FreeSWITCH? I want to share one WSS address/endpoint to multiple FreeSWITCH backends. Or is there any other best practice? My callflow is mostly that my internal SIP Servers called my registered webrtc clie

Re: [SR-Users] Multiple FreeSWITCH servers behind kamailio-websocket

2017-06-07 Thread Dmitri Savolainen
webrtc kamailio for example here https://github.com/havfo/WEBRTC-to-SIP By the way rtpengine is not mandatory with FreeSwitch. It is possible to use a set of FS(1.6) and balancing by dispatcher module 2017-06-07 14:47 GMT+03:00 Karsten Horsmann : > Hello List, > > > is there any howto about web

Re: [SR-Users] Multiple FreeSWITCH servers behind kamailio-websocket

2017-06-07 Thread Юрий Горличенко
rtpengine just a proxy. You can use kamailio just a webrtc proxy to freeswitch if want to use FS as backend server that will handle voice and convert it from SRTP to RTP. websocket just a transport like TCP,UDP and TLS, so you also can send SIP over websocket from kamailio using for example $f

Re: [SR-Users] Multiple FreeSWITCH servers behind kamailio-websocket

2017-06-18 Thread Karsten Horsmann
Hi, RTPengine is very Debian depending and I want to avoid running it. I tried to run RTP engine on my CentOS 6 SBCs. But then I realized that is an too old starting point. My Freeswitch webrtc systems run CentOS 7 and in my setup I could handel websocket and srtp stuff. But in that setup I am

Re: [SR-Users] Multiple FreeSWITCH servers behind kamailio-websocket

2017-06-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 18.06.17 10:25, Karsten Horsmann wrote: > Hi, > > RTPengine is very Debian depending and I want to avoid running it. if you refer to the kernel module, you can run without it, having rtpengine in the user space like tpproxy. Mayb be slower, but it works. Not sure about dependencies to