Hi!
We have recently had issues with one of our Production Kamailios.
When those happened, the log was filled with the following message:
CRITICAL: [core/tcp_main.c:4528]: handle_new_connect(): failed to add
new socket to the fd list
Now I wonder what the best approach is to prevent this.
We
Hi!
We have recently had issues with one of our Production Kamailios.
When those happened, the log was filled with the following message:
CRITICAL: [core/tcp_main.c:4528]: handle_new_connect(): failed to add
new socket to the fd list
Now I wonder what the best approach is to prevent this.
We
Hello
Can anyone help answer these questions:
- if SIP Timer L and Timer M from RFC6026 has been defined at Kamailio
(version v5.5.x)?
Timer L: Wait time for accepted INVITE request retransmits
Timer M: Wait time for retransmission of 2xx to INVITE or additional 2xx from
other branche
Hi all,
it might be a minor issue, or it might not be an issue at all, but I stumbled
over following statements in RFC 3261:
Chapter 16.6 Request Forwarding (of a proxy)
1. Copy request
The proxy starts with a copy of the received request. The copy
MUST initially c
Dear all,
Is there any other possibility to (automatically) check the plausibility/syntax
of an existing kamailio.cfg, besides
kamailio -c -f kamailio.cfg
?
Thanks,
Christoph
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
T
Hello everyone!
I'm running Kamailio 5.6.2 and having a potential problem on one of the
systems. The Slow timer process slowly consumes more and more of its PKG
memory. I did not allow it to use all memory by restartink Kamailio during
afterhours so I'm not sure what the consequences might be.
I'
Hello,
I have a question regarding Kamailio script and how the return code from a
command export is handled as a boolean.
In Kamailio script, see this example:
if (!jansson_get("method", $rb, "$var(method)")) {
xhttp_reply("400", "Bad Request", "", "")
Hello, I have some trouble to figure out how routing works when the
request coming from the kamailio itself (used as a user agent per example)
.I try to use presence PUA... modules. The issue I have is the NOTIFY
requests aren't sent to the good destination; it doesn't seems to obey to
the contac
Hello Daniel,
Thank you for the hints. I made a very simple configuration and Kamailio
v5.6 started without a problem. I will be looking into my current
configuration.
Test config:
loadmodule "tm.so"
loadmodule "tmx.so"
loadmodule "sl.so"
loadmodule "pv.so"
loadmodule "secsipid.so"
request_r
You can use the 5.6 branch, secsipid module should be the same as in
master branch.
Otherwise, C99 should be required to be supported by the compiler
because of code in many other components, is rpm build script enforcing
an older C standard in the compiler?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27.09.22 17:31, Вол
I will try the master branch too. Unfortunately there is a problem with the
RPM build procedure. I will try a different approach and update you when I
have something. Thank you for your help!
In file included from core/ppcfg.c:37:0:
core/utils/snexpr.h: In function 'snexpr_op':
core/utils/snexpr.
Hello,
I just tested with git master branch using:
secsipid_check_identity("");
and started fine. Maybe is something else wrong in your config.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27.09.22 13:58, Володимир Іванець wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> Sorry for the delayed response. I can confirm that I get the "unknown
>
Hello Daniel,
Sorry for the delayed response. I can confirm that I get the "unknown
command, missing loadmodule?" error when using an empty parameter *if
(secsipid_check_identity(""))*.
And thank you for the clarification about the file with the certificate.
пн, 26 вер. 2022 р. о 19:50 Daniel-Co
Hello,
secsipid_check_identity("") should be ok, because the parameter is
empty, but secsipid_check_identity() is not ok, because is no parameter.
Isn't it working when you have secsipid_check_identity("")?
It has to be one certificate, which corresponds to the key that was used
to generate the
Hello Daniel!
I started with a simpler configuration: *if (secsipid_check_identity()) {*
and *if (secsipid_check_identity("")) {* - according to documentation: *If
the parameter is empty, the function is downloading the key using the URL
from "info" parameter of the Identity header, using the valu
Hello,
maybe the function is provided with invalid parameters? What's the line
47 in the file?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 26.09.22 15:54, Володимир Іванець wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I'm testing calls with STIR/SHAKEN with a Secsipid module on a
> Kamailio version 5.6.1 and ran into a problem. Outbound
Hello everyone!
I'm testing calls with STIR/SHAKEN with a Secsipid module on a Kamailio
version 5.6.1 and ran into a problem. Outbound calls work fine when the
function *secsipid_add_identity* with appropriate parameters is called. But
as soon as I add function *secsipid_check_identity* to my conf
Hi, everyone!
In one sentence, I want to know how to how to add the shared key (aka. K, Ki)
used by AKA algorithm to Kamailio.
I’m using Kamailio as an IMS server to test my own 5G Core. As you know, UE
would send its first SIP Registration message to Kamailio with its IMPI and
IMPU, then Kama
On 5/13/22 16:38, Joel Serrano wrote:
I was wondering if pike_check_ip(ipaddr) needs strictly an IP as
parameter or can it be a string?
pike_check_ip is when you want to use an IP other than the source ip...
You can always use an htable to store the ip's of your high volume
clients...
somet
Hello,
One of our customers has lots of extensions that register to our platform
using all the same IP. Sometimes they get caught in our pike velocity rules
but if we increase the values to accommodate this client then all the
others could abuse the system.
I was wondering if pike_check_ip(ipaddr
Hello,
it's getting close for a new major release, indeed. Probably we should
freeze development by end of this month, test during April and release
sometime in May.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16.03.22 09:39, Stefan-Cristian Mititelu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to ask you if there is an approximate time
Hi,
I want to ask you if there is an approximate timeline for a kamailio 5.6
release?
We are planning an upgrade on our systems and are weighing different options.
Thank you
Stefan
__
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discuss
you can check the ticket
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2092
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 3:21 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the source port of tcp connections is typically an ephemeral port, that's
> due to tcp design and os layer implementation. Newer kernels have the
Hello,
the source port of tcp connections is typically an ephemeral port,
that's due to tcp design and os layer implementation. Newer kernels have
the option for reuse port for tcp, but even then it cannot be guaranteed
always -- there should be an option for recent kamailios as well.
Maybe it ca
Hello List,
I observe an interesting behavior. We use siptrace as an active capture
agent for QXIP HOMER/HEPIC installations.
The destination port and the source port in the HEPv3 Header are not
correct if you use transport tcp for example.
My Question: is that intended or a bug and i should fill
2021 2:19 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: [SR-Users] Question regarding parser error for REGISTER request
Hello List!
We have a certain user agent that somehow triggers a parser error log entry,
everytime this type of user agent registers.
Sep 20 12:03:49 kamailio-dev-1 /us
-request.
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com
-Original Message-
From: sr-users On Behalf Of Alessio Garzi
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 5:10 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: [SR-Users
Hello Kama ML,
today I stumbled on function "update_sl_stats()" inside sl_stats.c and
noticed that some response codes are treated differently.
For example here:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/a9ef78b7f43616f2ceaa26df97eff68eb5348846/src/modules/sl/sl_stats.c#L165
since we have a
Hello List!
We have a certain user agent that somehow triggers a parser error log entry,
everytime this type of user agent registers.
Sep 20 12:03:49 kamailio-dev-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1803]: ERROR:
[core/parser/parse_param.c:517]: parse_param2(): Invalid character, ; expected
The odd thing no
ubject: Re: [SR-Users] Question about suspected memory leak presence module
hi
using kamailio 4.4.7 on that environment
i will try to run some test locally simulating reception of a lot presence
subscription and observe mem_copy_subs_noc(),
Just to understand, both mem_copy_subs_noc are not expec
es – https://gilawa.com
>
>
>
> *From:* sr-users *On Behalf Of *Albert
> Petit
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 9, 2021 11:42 PM
> *To:* SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
> Users Mailing List
> *Subject:* [SR-Users] Question about suspected
r (SER) - Users
Mailing List
Subject: [SR-Users] Question about suspected memory leak presence module
Hi,
I am suspecitng presence module might be having a memory leak on a production
server used by an end user (not have access to it).
The output of command kamcmd mod.stats presence shm is
Hi,
I am suspecitng presence module might be having a memory leak on a
production server used by an end user (not have access to it).
The output of command kamcmd mod.stats presence shm is
Module: presence
{
mem_copy_subs(148): 25720
mem_copy_subs_noc(214): 1672201904
ець пише:
> Hello Rob,
>
> Thank you for sharing this information!
>
> Regards, Volodymyr Ivanets.
>
> ср, 21 лип. 2021 о 21:12 пише:
>
>>
>>
>> *Van:* sr-users *Namens *?
>> ???
>> *Verzonden:* woensdag 21 juli 2021 19:54
>
Hello Rob,
Thank you for sharing this information!
Regards, Volodymyr Ivanets.
ср, 21 лип. 2021 о 21:12 пише:
>
>
> *Van:* sr-users *Namens *?
> ???
> *Verzonden:* woensdag 21 juli 2021 19:54
> *Aan:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> *Onderwerp:* Re
Van: sr-users Namens ? ???
Verzonden: woensdag 21 juli 2021 19:54
Aan: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Onderwerp: Re: [SR-Users] Question about MS Teams integration
Rob,
Thank you for the link!
My domain record looks good in the Settings/Domains section. However
Rob,
Thank you for the link!
My domain record looks good in the Settings/Domains section. However, I
only choose the "Skype for Business" option. I did not select "Exchange and
Exchange Online Protection" as well as "Intune and Mobile Device Management
for Microsoft 365" options.
According to th
Hi Volodimir,
you have to setup and verify your domain under admin.microsoft.com in
domains section,then create users under that domain
and make a dialing plan for these users so you can call these users
from/to kamailio.
Vitalie.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:21 PM Володимир Іванець
wrote:
> Hel
Or this is better,
https://www.vitalpbx.org/blog/integrate-vitalpbx-with-microsoft-teams/
The first part you can use for kamailio
Van: sr-users Namens ? ???
Verzonden: woensdag 21 juli 2021 17:56
Aan: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Onderwerp: Re: [SR-Users
ailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Question about MS Teams integration
Hello Rob!
I have to confess that I don't have any experience with Teams :)
I've added "mydomain.com<http://mydomain.com/>" to the Settings => Domains
section in the Microsoft 365 admin center.
ванець
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 21, 2021 5:20:16 PM
> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> *Subject:* [SR-Users] Question about MS Teams integration
>
> Hello all!
>
> Sorry, this is not a direct Kamailio question. I would like to ask for
> some help from
t: [SR-Users] Question about MS Teams integration
Hello all!
Sorry, this is not a direct Kamailio question. I would like to ask for some
help from those who already did this.
I'm trying to integrate my testKamailio installation with MS Teams. I added the
"mydomain.com<http://my
Hello all!
Sorry, this is not a direct Kamailio question. I would like to ask for
some help from those who already did this.
I'm trying to integrate my testKamailio installation with MS Teams. I added
the "mydomain.com" to the Domains section (I kept the "
mydomain.onmicrosoft.com"). When I tried
absolutely yes.
Just set local DNS ip server in nslookup file in Ubuntu.
With regards.
On Wed, 12 May 2021, 20:48 Ibrahim soumana djibo,
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to kamailio. And I Am following the work of Franz Edler.
>
> I would like to test it in a local environment without internet conne
Hello,
I am new to kamailio. And I Am following the work of Franz Edler.
I would like to test it in a local environment without internet connection
on ubuntu. What I don't understand is, to download the packages I
necessarily need the internet. Do I have to use two network interfaces for
the same
Hello,
thanks for all these useful details!
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18.03.21 07:02, supreeth herle wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I am not using any developer mode for the phone app. I have tested
> using a test network with programmable SIM cards from Sysmocom and
> COTS UE. In order for the Android phones
Hi Daniel,
I am not using any developer mode for the phone app. I have tested using a
test network with programmable SIM cards from Sysmocom and COTS UE. In
order for the Android phones to perform an IMS attach I make use of Carrier
Privileges to force enable the VoLTE feature. More instructions c
Hi Supreeth,
Thank you very much for your information!
Is your URL as below?
https://github.com/herlesupreeth/Kamailio_IMS_Config
Regarding VoLTE, there is another URL on Open5GS site.
https://open5gs.org/open5gs/docs/tutorial/02-VoLTE-setup/
In any case, it seems that VoLTE built on private
Hello,
is there like a developer mode for this app that allows to register on a
local LTE network? Or you tested with a simcard built for you own network?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17.03.21 15:05, supreeth herle wrote:
> Hi Shigeru,
>
> Having written Open5GS (LTE / EPC) + Kamailio's VoLTE tutorial myse
Hi Shigeru,
Having written Open5GS (LTE / EPC) + Kamailio's VoLTE tutorial myself here
is my 2 cents on VoLTE client. You can use any Android phone / iphone with
its default phone app to test VoLTE (try to avoid Samsung phone as much as
possible)
Best regards,
Supreeth
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, 3:4
Hi Daniel,
Thank you very much for your information.
I have tried AGEphone (VoIP) before.
However, I don't have any information on whether Open5GS (LTE / EPC) +
Kamailio's VoLTE can be used with a normal phone app on comercial
smartphones.
Maybe it's just because I'm not familiar with this area.
Hello,
not acting much in this space, but I heard about something like imsdroid
-- probably you can try to search on the net and see what you can find.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12.03.21 09:01, shigeru ishida wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have one question.
>
> What softphones can I use when trying VoLTE (no
Hi all,
I have one question.
What softphones can I use when trying VoLTE (not VoIP) with Kamailio? I
would like to verify VoLTE of private LTE with Open5GS and Kamailio.
I'm sorry to ask you a question without much understanding of Kamailio,
VoIP and VoLTE.
Thank you very much in advance.
Best
Ok..that's interesting to know. Thanks for your input Richard. This helps
a lot.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:18 PM Richard Fuchs wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 14.04, Andrew Chen wrote:
> > Sure...I understand ICE has its own setup workflow than SIP but it's
> > also important that rtpengine uses the rtp
Sure...I understand ICE has its own setup workflow than SIP but it's also
important that rtpengine uses the rtp path that's negotiated in the SIP or
else it can cause confusion (to those who don't understand ICE very well
like me).
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:47 PM Richard Fuchs wrote:
> On 04/12/2
Hmm..that's interesting. You would guess that the rtpengine binary process
shouldn't start connecting ICE candidates once the SIP part is fully
negotiated, which should trigger the rtpengine module on the Kamailio to
tell rtpengine binary.."ok..you can start associating now..."
On Fri, Dec 4, 202
So from a SIP point of view, the 200 OK should of sent the final
negotiation of SDP once the client ACK's it right?
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:49 AM Richard Fuchs wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 11.39, Andrew Chen wrote:
> > oh...that's the IPv6 address of the STUN server, not the ipv6 of the
> > rtpengin
oh...that's the IPv6 address of the STUN server, not the ipv6 of the
rtpengine instance.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:38 AM Richard Fuchs wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 11.31, Andrew Chen wrote:
> > If that's the case then I don't know why this line doesn't show the
> > ipv6 address of the client:
> >
> >
If that's the case then I don't know why this line doesn't show the ipv6
address of the client:
Dec 3 18:05:47 ashmainrtpe42 rtpengine[8505]: DEBUG:
[ep1sbnkk9tikhg4kpmot]: Forward to sink endpoint:
2001:8a0:78fc:7000:e1d7:e93:3c50:ee71:59827 (RTP seq 25423 TS 0)
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:25 AM
So my next question would be:
My 200 OK back to the client should have rtpengine as the only ICE
candidate. Shouldn't it use that one instead?
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:18 AM Richard Fuchs wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 09.40, Andrew Chen wrote:
> > Hey Richard,
> >
> > So that's what I thought too un
On 04/12/2020 14.04, Andrew Chen wrote:
Sure...I understand ICE has its own setup workflow than SIP but it's
also important that rtpengine uses the rtp path that's negotiated in
the SIP or else it can cause confusion (to those who don't understand
ICE very well like me).
There is no RTP path
On 04/12/2020 13.36, Andrew Chen wrote:
Hmm..that's interesting. You would guess that the rtpengine binary
process shouldn't start connecting ICE candidates once the SIP part is
fully negotiated, which should trigger the rtpengine module on the
Kamailio to tell rtpengine binary.."ok..you can s
Hey Richard,
So that's what I thought too until I saw this in rtpengine logs for one of
my test calls:
Dec 3 18:05:47 ashmainrtpe42 rtpengine[8505]: DEBUG:
[ep1sbnkk9tikhg4kpmot]: Forward to sink endpoint:
2001:8a0:78fc:7000:e1d7:e93:3c50:ee71:59827 (RTP seq 25423 TS 0)
unless I misunderstood w
On 04/12/2020 13.10, Andrew Chen wrote:
So from a SIP point of view, the 200 OK should of sent the final
negotiation of SDP once the client ACK's it right?
The requirement to send an updated offer once ICE has completed with the
final negotiated candidates existed in the original ICE RFC, but
Hey Richard,
So it is true rtpengine is handling rtp between kamailio and receiver
(freeswitch). I'm trying to understand if there is a way to not
forward rtp to any of the ICE candidates in the original INVITE request
from the client side. In other words, have the client rtp forward directly
to
Actually Yuriy's..sorry...I see what you are saying.
So my question should be, this means I don't have a choice but to use the
ICE candidate between client and kamailio?
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:11 AM Andrew Chen wrote:
> So for Yuriy's comment:
>
> I did issue ICE=force parameter but, as you c
So for Yuriy's comment:
I did issue ICE=force parameter but, as you can see my paste, it's still
sending RTP sequence packets to the ICE candidate, which is not what I want
to do.
Richard,
So our current setup is this:
SIP
client -> kamailio -> freeswitch
RTP
client -> freeswitch
What I want t
On 04/12/2020 11.39, Andrew Chen wrote:
oh...that's the IPv6 address of the STUN server, not the ipv6 of the
rtpengine instance.
Ok. From rtpengine's point of view, this is one of the client's IP
addresses. The ICE candidate in the SDP is the client telling rtpengine:
This is one of my own ad
On 04/12/2020 11.31, Andrew Chen wrote:
If that's the case then I don't know why this line doesn't show the
ipv6 address of the client:
Dec 3 18:05:47 ashmainrtpe42 rtpengine[8505]: DEBUG:
[ep1sbnkk9tikhg4kpmot]: Forward to sink endpoint:
2001:8a0:78fc:7000:e1d7:e93:3c50:ee71:59827 (RTP seq
On 04/12/2020 10.39, Andrew Chen wrote:
So my next question would be:
My 200 OK back to the client should have rtpengine as the only ICE
candidate. Shouldn't it use that one instead?
Yes it should. And it probably does.
Cheers
___
Kamailio (SER)
On 04/12/2020 09.40, Andrew Chen wrote:
Hey Richard,
So that's what I thought too until I saw this in rtpengine logs for
one of my test calls:
Dec 3 18:05:47 ashmainrtpe42 rtpengine[8505]: DEBUG:
[ep1sbnkk9tikhg4kpmot]: Forward to sink endpoint:
2001:8a0:78fc:7000:e1d7:e93:3c50:ee71:59827
On 04/12/2020 09.24, Andrew Chen wrote:
Hey Richard,
So it is true rtpengine is handling rtp between kamailio and receiver
(freeswitch). I'm trying to understand if there is a way to not
forward rtp to any of the ICE candidates in the original INVITE
request from the client side. In other w
On 04/12/2020 09.11, Andrew Chen wrote:
So for Yuriy's comment:
I did issue ICE=force parameter but, as you can see my paste, it's
still sending RTP sequence packets to the ICE candidate, which is not
what I want to do.
Richard,
So our current setup is this:
SIP
client -> kamailio -> frees
Hello
2020-12-03T18:05:46.456106+00:00 ashmainkama51 kamailio[22147]:
a=candidate:2274611867 1 tcp 1518283007
2001:8a0:78fc:7000:e1d7:e93:3c50:ee71 9 typ host tcptype active generation
0 network-id 2 network-cost 10
is a local candidate sent in the offer from the client
ICE=force just says rtpengin
Hi all,
I was wondering if someone can help me understand how the ICE parameter
works in the rtpengine module works.
So basically our client does an ICE candidate lookup and grabs a list of
them and applies it to the INVITE that gets sent to the Kamailio. The list
looks like this:
2020-12-03T18
On 03/12/2020 13.39, Andrew Chen wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if someone can help me understand how the ICE
parameter works in the rtpengine module works.
So basically our client does an ICE candidate lookup and grabs a list
of them and applies it to the INVITE that gets sent to the Kamail
request).
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>
From: sr-users On Behalf Of Mojtaba
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 12:43 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Question about t
Any idea?
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, 14:26 Mojtaba, wrote:
> Hello,
> Some confusing things while developing in Kamailio:
> In is_method_f function in textops module, the code checks the HDR_CSEQ_F
> in msg also, and if the method name appears in CSEQ_F, The result is
> returned TRUE.
> These question
Hello,
Some confusing things while developing in Kamailio:
In is_method_f function in textops module, the code checks the HDR_CSEQ_F
in msg also, and if the method name appears in CSEQ_F, The result is
returned TRUE.
These question will arise why in this function, the CSEQ field in message
will ch
Hello Jimmy,
not being the author of the module, so some generic comments.
The xhttp module is used from the jsonrpcs module, but the jsonrpcs module
controls the handling. This module implements the asynchronous processing as
you quoted below. The xhttp module does not implement asynchronous h
Hi,
I am on kamailio 5.2.4 and want to use the xhttp module for certain management
operations.
The request involves some DB queries . The DB is remote and via ODBC and might
have some delay.The documentation on the xhttp module states about latency
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/
m: sr-users On Behalf Of Floimair
Florian
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 3:22 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: [SR-Users] Question regarding priority in dispatcher module
Dear all!
After reading the documentation on dispatcher module I still
Florian
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 3:22 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: [SR-Users] Question regarding priority in dispatcher module
Dear all!
After reading the documentation on dispatcher module I still have a question
that isn't really documented.
Regarding the pri
Dear all!
After reading the documentation on dispatcher module I still have a question
that isn't really documented.
Regarding the priority value of an entry in a dispatcher list:
Is a lower numerical priority value regarded as higher priority or is it the
other way around?
Hopefully someone c
Hi all,
We are looking for information as to what the ims_ipsec_pcscf module was
written for and tested against.
What was the target UE/EPC/PCRF that Tsvetomir Dimitrov wrote the module
towards?
Has an emulated EPC been tested with this module? If so which one(s)?
Thanks in advance,
Martin
_
Nevermind, got it.
~# grep "INSERT.*version" /usr/share/kamailio/mysql/*
> /usr/share/kamailio/mysql/acc-create.sql:INSERT INTO version (table_name,
> table_version) values ('acc','5');
> /usr/share/kamailio/mysql/acc-create.sql:INSERT INTO version (table_name,
> table_version) values ('acc_cdrs',
Hello All,
I need to do a version upgrade from 5 to 5.2. I read about the
version_table parameter and i know i can create it and set the versions
there.
But where do i get the correct versions for the table? i.e.: location is
version N?
Thanks all!
Regards,
David Villasmil
email: david.villasm
Oh yeah.
—
Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
> On Sep 24, 2019, at 7:32 PM, Shahdee Nelson wrote:
>
> With your software would I be able to create, and modify VOIP lines? As in
> saying would I be able to provide VOIP numbers that can make outbound calls
> to USA f
With your software would I be able to create, and modify VOIP lines? As in
saying would I be able to provide VOIP numbers that can make outbound calls
to USA from USA?
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamai
Hi Daniel,
good tip about the crypto module.
It will indeed hide the IP address in the call-id, just tried it:
Call-ID: d810d369-aa60-4d79-aee5-9c03d2e66781
I think if we would feed the sruid unique ID (in libs/srutils) into the SHA256
hash (also available there) this it should be secure enoug
Hello,
using the ip in call-id is not a good practice imo, I had it in mind to
replace it properly everywhere for quite some time -- actually at this
moment there is an option that can be activated in the crypto module
making the call-id to be generated with libssl unique id generation
functions,
Hello Henning,
No concerns at all!! As you say, the Call-ID can really say whatever...
The only concern could/would be in the security topic that you are
disclosing potential sensible information about your infrastructure
blablabla... but that can be solved just by changing the listen= order so
ev
Hello Joel,
funny - I just had this discussion about the same topic some days ago.
In the end this is "only" the call-id, the IP should not be used to to routing
descisions etc.. Do you have some more concerns about this?
I think as well it just uses the first IP. I think at the moment the call
Hello,
Simple doubt regarding dispatcher module when you have
the ds_default_socket() modparam set:
Say you have 2 kamailio boxes, active + passive, one shared IP via
keepalived On the actrive node, you have dispatcher.send_ping to 1, and
the passive has it set to 0.
So far OK, only the acti
Thanks Joel and Karsten both ideas worked.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:13 AM Karsten Horsmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Or you could configure
> one listen advertise pubip
> And a second listen internal ip (could be from the same private subnet) and
> you point your Asterisk to the private ip.
>
>
> Ch
Hi,
Or you could configure
one listen advertise pubip
And a second listen internal ip (could be from the same private subnet) and
you point your Asterisk to the private ip.
Cheers
Karsten
Joel Serrano schrieb am Sa., 29. Juni 2019, 06:51:
> Using the “advertise” option in the listen= param
Using the “advertise” option in the listen= param will cause the route/via
headers to use whatever you configure there regardless of what the actual
interface IP is.
One option is for you enable a second port for communication with asterisk,
and leave 5060 with the advertise for your trunk...
On
Hello,
I have a question about record route and via headers. My scenario is
the following:
[asterisk] [kam] [trunk]
10.142.0.27 10.142.0.6200.x.x.x
I have an asterisk an a kamailio in a private ip network
(10.142.0.0/24). Kamailio has the address 10.142.0.6 but is also
natt
Hello Henning,
I'm preparing Kamailio configuration that uses save() responce codes for
additional actions so email from Lars brought my attention. This is not a
problem since as Lars mentioned I can check expires value. I just was
curious if this is a correct behavior or not.
Thank you!
ср, 26
Hello,
just briefly looked into the code, but I think the return value is like this
for the following reasons:
- function update_contacts(..) will skip if a contact is not found and a
expires=0 is given (it could be also e.g. that the Contact just expired a few
seconds ago in Kamailio)
- this
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
