Am Donnerstag, 14. März 2019, 14:19:22 CET schrieb Alex Balashov:
> Perhaps a component-orientated view is not the correct one here. It
> almost sounds like what is being sought is a kind of "cookbook of
> Kamailio patterns"[1], if you like. This answers a lot of questions
> that also capture
meaningful insight
> rather than a click drive vote or similar.
>
> // Samuel
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* sr-users on behalf of Alex
> Balashov
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 14, 2019 14:19
> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] RFC: rating - r
List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] RFC: rating - ranking system for community
By way of further thought:
Perhaps a component-orientated view is not the correct one here. It
almost sounds like what is being sought is a kind of "cookbook of
Kamailio patterns"[1], if you like. This ans
By way of further thought:
Perhaps a component-orientated view is not the correct one here. It
almost sounds like what is being sought is a kind of "cookbook of
Kamailio patterns"[1], if you like. This answers a lot of questions
that also capture preferences about third-party FOSS componentry,
Hi,
A few off-the-cuff thoughts, in no particular order:
1. Kamailio does have hundreds of modules of all kinds, and some sort of
guide for which ones to use when, or some other schema which would serve
to provide some conceptual organisation for the modules, is probably a
desirable
Hello,
starting to continue the discussions here on mailing lists about some of
the approached topics during the last IRC meeting -- there will be
couple of them.
The one now is about finding and deploying a ranking/rating system that
could eventually help community members to make decisions
