Hey guys,
Is this the right place to ask about rtpengine (ngcp) related issues with
kernel packet forwarding?
Thanks.
--
Andy Chen
Sr. Telephony Lead Engineer
achen@ fuze.com
--
*Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
attachments may be confidential. If you
Hello All,
I have an issue where Kamailio-RTPEngine-Asterisk calls work good when a
softphone UAC on an IOS phone makes an Inbound call to a WebRTC client.
However, if the softphone UAC is on Windows, it does not work (No Audio/Video).
I noticed in the Wireshark trace that when using IOS I se
There is an RTPEngine mailing list, I believe, but RTPEngine questions
are often posed here given its close association with Kamailio. What's
going on?
On 9/11/20 2:57 PM, Andrew Chen wrote:
Hey guys,
Is this the right place to ask about rtpengine (ngcp) related issues
with kernel packet for
On 11/09/2020 15.29, Andrew Chen wrote:
Thanks Alex.
So it turns out my rtpengine stopped working after our latest kernel
upgrade to:
Linux sjomainrtpe30 5.3.0-1035-aws #37-Ubuntu SMP Sun Sep 6 01:17:09
UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
at the time, I was running an older version 8.0
Related to tainted kernel, I faced the same issue when I deployed
rtpengine on a Suse Enterprise many months ago, so I do not really
remember the exact steps, but there is a way to disable the check of
signed kernel modules (iirc, these are only the ones coming from the
kernel source tree, so if yo
Thanks Alex.
So it turns out my rtpengine stopped working after our latest kernel
upgrade to:
Linux sjomainrtpe30 5.3.0-1035-aws #37-Ubuntu SMP Sun Sep 6 01:17:09 UTC
2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
at the time, I was running an older version 8.0.x so I recompiled all the
ngcp packages under
Sorry let me clarify this line here:
"...at the time, I was running an older version 8.0.x so I recompiled all
the ngcp packages under this kernel and completed the installation without
issues.."
8.0.x is the older ngcp version. I recompiled version 9.0.1.0 under that
new kernel version 5.3.0-103
Thanks Daniel. Let me look at that option.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:52 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Related to tainted kernel, I faced the same issue when I deployed
> rtpengine on a Suse Enterprise many months ago, so I do not really remember
> the exact steps, but there is a way to d
I have testes build on 5.7 kernel on CentOS 8 (custom rpm package)
You will find commit here
https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine/issues/975
Sergey
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:53 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Related to tainted kernel, I faced the same issue when I deployed
> rtpengine o
On 14/09/2020 13.14, Andrew Chen wrote:
Btw Richard Fuchs, to follow up on your comment, we have a load
generator running sipp which is non-SRTP traffic.
As for the fallback, how does that work exactly? We tried the
following today and it seems to have helped:
- Removed "--table" startup para
Btw Richard Fuchs, to follow up on your comment, we have a load
generator running sipp which is non-SRTP traffic.
As for the fallback, how does that work exactly? We tried the following
today and it seems to have helped:
- Removed "--table" startup param in systems file
- Uncommented "no-fallback
Sergey Safarov,
Thanks for the response but we're not a CentOS house. Just Ubuntu.18.04.
One other question. Is Daniel's suggestion the only way to get around
kernel forwarding with our current setup? Will there be support for it in
the future without disabling module signature check?
On Mon,
Hmm...interesting.
Is there logging which states the fallback is issued? If so, can someone
share?
Thanks.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:28 PM Richard Fuchs wrote:
> On 14/09/2020 13.14, Andrew Chen wrote:
> > Btw Richard Fuchs, to follow up on your comment, we have a load
> > generator running s
Hello All,
I read rtpengine can multiplex and demultiplex RTP/RTCP.
Cf.https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine
Example:
UAC -> Kamailio + rtpengine -> Asterisk
UAC and Asterisk don't support RFC 5761. Only rtpengine does.
Does this mean that uac must be compliance with RFC 5761 if I want
multiple
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Abdoul Osséni wrote:
> Does this mean that uac must be compliance with RFC 5761 if I want multiplex
> and demultiplex RTP/RTCP between UAC and rtpengine?
I don't know whether I understand your question correctly, but the
options in rtpengine are "graceful".
Thank you.
Abdoul.
2017-08-16 11:25 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Damm :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Abdoul Osséni
> wrote:
> > Does this mean that uac must be compliance with RFC 5761 if I want
> multiplex
> > and demultiplex RTP/RTCP between UAC and rtpengine?
>
> I don't know whether I
16 matches
Mail list logo
