> On Jan 13, 2023, at 5:47 AM, Mathias Schneuwly wrote:
>
> restricting the access from certain IPs would be good enough instead of call
> authentication. I need to think about it.
This approach is widely used within the industry for sending calls among
trusted network elements. It's fine.
tps://gilawa.com/>
From: Mathias Schneuwly
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2023 11:47 AM
To: Henning Westerholt
Cc: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Parallel call forking with call authorization
Hi Henning
We wanted to reach some sort of security, but you are probably right, that
restr
; Henning
>
>
>
> --
>
> Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
>
> Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Mathias Schneuwly
> *Sent:* Friday, January 13, 2023 10:37 AM
> *To:* Henning Westerholt
> *Cc:* sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
&
Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>
From: Mathias Schneuwly
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2023 10:37 AM
To: Henning Westerholt
Cc: sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Parallel call forking with call authorization
Thanks fo
Thanks for your reply
This is what I'm doing at the moment to continue with the task as long as
it does not work as I would expect. Without call authentication, the
parallel forking works as expected.
If somehow possible I would like to keep it since I don't want anybody to
send calls to
Hello,
Just a generic remark - if you manage also the asterisk, I’d suggest to not use
the SIP authentication method for outgoing calls and just allow all calls from
Kamailio towards asterisk. This would make your setup easier and call setup
also (slightly) faster.
Cheers,
Henning
--
