[SR-Users] Re: Reject TCP SYN

2024-02-15 Thread David Villasmil via sr-users
Thanks Karsten, That won’t work for me with TLS clients, which is what I’m trying to do. I’m making a PR with a new tcp param. Thanks! Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com phone: +34669448337 On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 17:42, Karsten Horsmann wrote: > Hi David, > > I

[SR-Users] Re: Reject TCP SYN

2024-02-15 Thread Karsten Horsmann via sr-users
Hi David, I have most of my setups with OPTIONS pings (upstream carrier and myself). If I want to fade out a Kamailio I set the option response to an not 200 value (like 603 or whatever) and my internal and the external system didn't bring in new invites but leave the currently running out. You

[SR-Users] Re: Reject TCP SYN

2024-02-09 Thread David Villasmil via sr-users
Hey, Henning, yeah I thought about that, but thought that maybe there was a better way to do it via Kamailio Thanks! Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.w...@gmail.com phone: +34669448337 On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 14:08, Henning Westerholt wrote: > Hello, > > > > what about e.g.

[SR-Users] Re: Reject TCP SYN

2024-02-09 Thread Henning Westerholt via sr-users
Hello, what about e.g. just using something like iptables, nftables etc..? iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --syn --destination-port -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited Cheers, Henning From: David Villasmil via sr-users Sent: Donnerstag, 8. Februar 2024 14:28 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users