[SR-Users] Re: Too many 200:OK sip responses

2023-01-05 Thread Henning Westerholt
o (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: [SR-Users] Re: Too many 200:OK sip responses Yes. The ACK is missing. Kamailio does not receive 200:OK from calling points for these calls. How can I identify these calls which are in session and was in a ringing state? I want to delete their data from the databas

[SR-Users] Re: Too many 200:OK sip responses

2023-01-05 Thread David Villasmil
So you’re saying you do see the 200 from the b-leg? Shouldn’t you try to see why kamailio is not detecting it and forwarding it to the a-leg so the a-leg can send an ACK and finish the transaction properly? On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 11:21, Waqar 40 wrote: > Yes. The ACK is missing. Kamailio does not

[SR-Users] Re: Too many 200:OK sip responses

2023-01-05 Thread Waqar 40
Yes. The ACK is missing. Kamailio does not receive 200:OK from calling points for these calls. How can I identify these calls which are in session and was in a ringing state? I want to delete their data from the database. On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 1:03 PM Olle E. Johansson wrote: > > > > On 5 Jan 2

[SR-Users] Re: Too many 200:OK sip responses

2023-01-04 Thread Olle E. Johansson
> On 5 Jan 2023, at 07:06, Waqar 40 wrote: > > Dear All, > > For a normal call, Kamailio receives 200:OK sip response for the method > invite only once but for some calls, it receives 200:OK too many times around > 6 to 7. And I also do not receive BYE or any other packets for this kind of