[SR-Users] Serial Forking with differing next hop for each branch?

2023-09-21 Thread Barry Flanagan
Hi I have a scenario where I need to implement serial forking but each destination has also a next hop proxy. I can do the forking using append_branch, but how can I set the destination URI for each branch? In some cases the R-URI does not change, only the next hop proxy. Example: R-URI

Re: [SR-Users] Serial Forking on BYE message

2022-11-05 Thread Alex Balashov
Hi Ilie, You’re asking more of a proxy than it can do. :-) After a call is established, the initial INVITE transaction is over and the destinations are fixed. That initial INVITE transaction is the only point at which the proxy can do any kind of forking. — Alex > On Nov 4, 2022, at 8:42

[SR-Users] Serial Forking on BYE message

2022-11-04 Thread Ilie Soltanici
Hello, I have a challenge here to do serial forking, not when the call is failed on the first destination, but when the call is ended. So, the first will go to one destination, will be answered, and when it's ended the BYE message should be dropped and forward the initial INVITE to another

Re: [SR-Users] serial forking kamailio - twilio

2021-07-21 Thread Filippo Graziola
Hi, thanks for answering. Based on your answer I was able to move the call sequence to Twilio instead of handling in kamailio, now I send the INVITE from kamailio to Twilio and in Twilio make a request to my own API endpoint to create the call sequence and call logs. thanks Filippo I think

Re: [SR-Users] serial forking kamailio - twilio

2021-07-19 Thread Alex Balashov
I think what you’re asking is: if a call is answered and hung up, can Kamailio make another call to somewhere else? If so, the answer is no; proxies just can’t do that. Forking deals with the management early-stage requests during their pendency. Once a final dispositive reply for a request

[SR-Users] serial forking kamailio - twilio

2021-07-19 Thread Filippo Graziola
Hi all, I have a question for my kamailio configuration which works like this: - INVITE arrives to kamailio - HTTP async request to API endpoint - Resume, use of rtjson module for parallel forking and loop to kamailio itself - One of the invite is "transformed" in serial forking with rtjson

Re: [SR-Users] Serial forking with RTJson module

2020-07-11 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, it should be possible to provide only the uri attribute in each of the serial routes. To URI should not be overwriten in such case. Can you get the debug messages for such case with debug=3 in kamailio.cfg as well as the pcap file with the sip traffic? Cheers, Daniel On 10.07.20 17:48,

[SR-Users] Serial forking with RTJson module

2020-07-11 Thread Julien Klingenmeyer
Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to use the rtjson module to do serial forking and at each failure only replacing the R-URI from the initial request? Have some of you already tried this module in this way? If so, how should the json body look like? Could I have a body with only

Re: [SR-Users] Serial forking

2018-05-29 Thread igor.potjevlesch
how can I change this behaviour to do serial forking instead. -Message d'origine- De : sr-users De la part de Daniel Tryba Envoyé : lundi 28 mai 2018 17:13 À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Serial forking On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:55:30PM +0200

Re: [SR-Users] Serial forking

2018-05-28 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:55:30PM +0200, igor.potjevle...@gmail.com wrote: > I know that the default behaviour of two aliases in kamailio.aliases result > in parallel forking. > > I'm wondering if its possible to do serial forking instead? For example, in > case that the first INVITE has no

[SR-Users] Serial forking

2018-05-28 Thread igor.potjevlesch
Hello, I know that the default behaviour of two aliases in kamailio.aliases result in parallel forking. I'm wondering if its possible to do serial forking instead? For example, in case that the first INVITE has no 180/183, or neither 100 Trying, then send the INVITE to the second entry?