Re: [SR-Users] dns_naptr_ignore_rfc default value

2020-08-10 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > The DNS NAPTR is also turned off by default, which should be on, based > on RFC, iirc, but that adds extra DNS query and slows down everything as > most of services I saw so far do no relay on NAPTR. It is OK to have NAPTR lookup off by default, but if it is tur

[SR-Users] dns_naptr_ignore_rfc default value

2020-08-10 Thread Juha Heinanen
What is the point of dns_naptr_ignore_rfc default value: dns_naptr_ignore_rfc If the DNS lookup should ignore the remote side's protocol preferences, as indicated by the Order field in the NAPTR records and mandated by RFC 2915. dns_naptr_ignore_rfc = yes | no (default yes) In my (and RFC 291

Re: [SR-Users] dns_naptr_ignore_rfc default value

2020-08-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 10.08.20 17:08, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >> The DNS NAPTR is also turned off by default, which should be on, based >> on RFC, iirc, but that adds extra DNS query and slows down everything as >> most of services I saw so far do no relay on NAPTR. > It is OK to ha

Re: [SR-Users] dns_naptr_ignore_rfc default value

2020-08-10 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
I have not developed that feature, but many options are not following the recommendations from RFCs with their default values, but more what was the common practice/best supported at that time (e.g., auto-switch protocol to tcp/tls on mtu size). The DNS NAPTR is also turned off by default, which s