Re: [SR-Users] is_audio_on_hold() doesn't support rfc3264

2018-02-12 Thread Julia Boudniatsky
Hello, Thank you for implementation. Our lab equipment is busy now, later i will check it out and get back to you. Does this fixed applicable for version 4.4? Best regards, Julia On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote: > According to the code, both rfc2543 and rfc3264 are handled. >

Re: [SR-Users] is_audio_on_hold() doesn't support rfc3264

2018-02-02 Thread Ovidiu Sas
According to the code, both rfc2543 and rfc3264 are handled. Just tested this out with jitsi and it's working fine. Can you provide a sample of your tests? Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Julia Boudniatsky wrote: > FYI, > > After some tests found, that function "is_audio_on_

Re: [SR-Users] is_audio_on_hold() doesn't support rfc3264

2017-11-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, maybe someone with the specs fresh in mind can list here all the cases when audio (or other media) is on hold. That may speed up getting it implemented, helping developer by saving the time to go to the RFCs... Cheers, Daniel On 01.11.17 12:51, Julia Boudniatsky wrote: > Hello, > > Thank

Re: [SR-Users] is_audio_on_hold() doesn't support rfc3264

2017-11-01 Thread Julia Boudniatsky
Hello, Thank you, Daniel. But with both is_audio_on_hold() and sdp_with_active_media("audio") I can't recognize a=sendonly. I combine sdp_with_active_media("audio") with sdp_get_line_startswith("$avp(a)", "a=sendonly"). However, it would be nice to use only one function. Best regards, Julia On

Re: [SR-Users] is_audio_on_hold() doesn't support rfc3264

2017-11-01 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, for the moment maybe you can combine the condition of is_audio_on_hold() with sdp_with_active_media("audio"):   - https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.1.x/modules/sdpops.html#sdpops.f.sdp_with_active_media Otherwise I agree that the is_audio_on_hold() should be fixed to support both rf

Re: [SR-Users] is_audio_on_hold() doesn't support rfc3264

2017-11-01 Thread Julia Boudniatsky
Hello, I opened the ticket #1292. Thank you, Julia On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote: > I updated the documentation to reflect this. > If you need support for RFC3264, please open a ticket. > > Regards, > Ovidiu Sas > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Julia Boudniatsky > w

Re: [SR-Users] is_audio_on_hold() doesn't support rfc3264

2017-10-31 Thread Ovidiu Sas
I updated the documentation to reflect this. If you need support for RFC3264, please open a ticket. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Julia Boudniatsky wrote: > FYI, > > After some tests found, that function "is_audio_on_hold()" (textops) > supports only rfc 2543, > where "hol

Re: [SR-Users] is_audio_on_hold() doesn't support rfc3264

2017-10-26 Thread Anthony Joseph Messina
On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 8:52:28 AM CDT Julia Boudniatsky wrote: > FYI, > > After some tests found, that function "*is_audio_on_hold()*" (textops) > *supports > only rfc 254*3, > where "hold" is indicated by setting the "c" destination addresses for > the media streams to zero (0.0.0.0). >

[SR-Users] is_audio_on_hold() doesn't support rfc3264

2017-10-24 Thread Julia Boudniatsky
FYI, After some tests found, that function "*is_audio_on_hold()*" (textops) *supports only rfc 254*3, where "hold" is indicated by setting the "c" destination addresses for the media streams to zero (0.0.0.0). The newest *rfc3264*, where "hold" is indicated by a=sendonly/inactive, *is not supp