There is an open ticket for that:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2137
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 03:20, Sergiu Pojoga wrote:
> Thanks Daniel, I'll give it a try using xavps instead.
>
> Regards,
> --Sergiu
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:52 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> mico...@gmail.c
Thanks Daniel, I'll give it a try using xavps instead.
Regards,
--Sergiu
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:52 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there is an alternative where you can use a combination of xavps and corex
> module function via_use_xavp_fields() -- see:
>
> * https://www.ka
Hello,
there is an alternative where you can use a combination of xavps and
corex module function via_use_xavp_fields() -- see:
* https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.3.x/core#xavp_via_fields
I think I looked at some point at set_advertised_address() from core to
make it accept variables
Hi there,
The function doesn't appear to accept vars.
For example, set_advertised_address("$var(someaddress)") results in a VIA
of string $var(someaddress), instead of var's value.
https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.3.x/core#set_advertised_address
kamailio 5.3.2 (x86_64/linux) 0bed10
Ch
When a phone registers, its traffic comes to one of the two sockets.
When that phone is called, after lookup location, the socket associated
to the registration of the target user is selected. So you do not need
to do anything special for calling between phones.
When calling to a PSTN/foreign prov
So I could do something like this:
listen=192.168.2.9:5070 advertise 20.30.40.50:5070
listen=192.168.2.9:5050
However when I do an invite to 192.168.2.32, would Kamailio choose 5050
or 5070?
Same when inviting to 40.40.40.40
If I were to listen to another local IP, then the routing table in L
For whatever reason my initial impression was if it was possible for
external devices to connect without port forwarding...
I stand corrected.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:30 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> It is not about an external network interface, but external
> traffic/devices. The NA
It is not about an external network interface, but external
traffic/devices. The NAT in this case is a port forwarding firewall,
like Amazon or Google cloud, where you have a local address on server
and the firewall is forwarding by port all traffic from an assigned
public address.
Such scenario i
Slightly confused here... didn't he say that Kamailio and PBX are behind
NAT? If so, what external interface are we talking about?
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 9:18 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> you do not need a second kamailio, the same instance can listen on
> multiple sockets. Yo
Hello,
you do not need a second kamailio, the same instance can listen on
multiple sockets. You can also use a single ip, just listen on one port
for traffic from local network and on another port for external traffic
(this socket with advertise address).
If the router cannot handle dns query bas
That might work, provided that the router can handle a local DNS.
It would, however still require adding an extra Kamailio instance with
another IP. Plus a branch of the invite to both local and public
instance. Plus an extra location table.
Med Liberalistiske Hilsner ---
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:40:38AM +0100, Kjeld Flarup wrote:
> Yes, the Phones may be on either local LAN (Wifi) and Internet via mobile
> data.
How about use different local address, 1 with an advertise for external
clients, 1 without. Have local DNS resolv to the 1 ip without advertise.
__
Hi Daniel
Yes, the Phones may be on either local LAN (Wifi) and Internet via
mobile data.
Med Liberalistiske Hilsner --
Civilingeniør, Kjeld Flarup - Mit sind er mere åbent end min tegnebog
Sofienlundvej 6B, 7560 Hjerm, Tlf: 40 29 41 49
Den ikk
Hello,
it is not clear what exactly you want to achieve...
Is it that for connected phones from local network to use the local IP
and for sip messages with devices outside to use external ip?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 04.12.18 23:33, Kjeld Flarup wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a PBX behind NAT.
> Thus I adv
Sure, eliminate NAT altogether? Haha
Don't see how else.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018, 5:34 PM Kjeld Flarup Hello
>
> I have a PBX behind NAT.
> Thus I advertise the public IP, and forwards the port to my PBX.
>
> listen=LOCALIP:5070 advertise EXTERNALIP:5070
>
> Now clients can connect to the PBX from t
Hello
I have a PBX behind NAT.
Thus I advertise the public IP, and forwards the port to my PBX.
listen=LOCALIP:5070 advertise EXTERNALIP:5070
Now clients can connect to the PBX from the Internet. And also inside
the LAN, because I have enabled NAT loopback.
However some customers sysadmins c
Hi Daniel!
Thanks for the effort! Really appreciate it!
I am not using the 5.2 version yet, so it I won't be able to test it right
away...
Best regards,
Patrick Wakano
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 18:37, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> yesterday afternoon I pushed an alternative for allow
Hello,
yesterday afternoon I pushed an alternative for allowing setting the
address and port in local Via headers using XAVP, see:
- https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#xavp_via_fields
I didn't have the time to do any tests, but was in master before
freezing code for 5.2.x serie
Thanks for the replies Daniel and Henning!
The problem with the listen address is that it can't be set at run time per
call, for example, after reading the value from the DB And also it is
way too dirty to use the set_advertised_address with a static string
value
Long story short, we have a
Hello,
the pseudo-variable is read only.
The recommended way would be to use listen with advertise, like:
listen=udp:1.2.3.4:5060 advertise 5.6.7.8:5060
That will take care of both Via and Record-Route headers as well as
matching myself, no need to do other stuff in route blocks. Doesn't work
f
Am Freitag, 28. September 2018, 07:16:18 CEST schrieb Patrick Wakano:
> Sorry to annoy again, but I did find a couple of more emails asking around
> about the possibility to pass a variable to the set_advertised_address, but
> no one was replied
> How is the status of these old core functions t
Sorry to annoy again, but I did find a couple of more emails asking around
about the possibility to pass a variable to the set_advertised_address, but
no one was replied
How is the status of these old core functions that don't accept variables
as parameters? Is it something being worked on?
Ki
Hello list,
Hope you all doing fine!
I am using version 5.0.7 and I was trying to use the set_advertised_address
with an avp variable but it does not replace with the avp value
I then find out this thread
https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2016-March/092327.html, in
which is mention
23 matches
Mail list logo
