Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-30 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > These commits were pushed to branch 5.3 already. Yes, I noticed, thanks, Juha ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 30.03.20 12:24, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >> I pushed two commits on master and branch 5.3 to skip reusing tcp >> connection id. See if it solves your case. > I tried with master and now setting of $du in branch route worked OK. OK, thanks for testing and the

Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 30.03.20 12:16, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >>> Mar 29 10:19:28 char /usr/bin/sip-proxy[26162]: INFO: * du = >>> sip:127.0.0.1:5090;transport=tcp >> Does this happen after a usrloc location lookup? Trying to figure out >> what destination-related

Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-30 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > I pushed two commits on master and branch 5.3 to skip reusing tcp > connection id. See if it solves your case. I tried with master and now setting of $du in branch route worked OK. -- Juha ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users

Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-30 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > > Mar 29 10:19:28 char /usr/bin/sip-proxy[26162]: INFO: * du = > > sip:127.0.0.1:5090;transport=tcp > > Does this happen after a usrloc location lookup? Trying to figure out > what destination-related processing is done before to see what fields > were

Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 30.03.20 09:24, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > On 30.03.20 07:09, Juha Heinanen wrote: >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: >> >>> Have you tested with tcp/tls or with udp? There was a group of commits >>> trying to propagate the tcp connection id as much as possible to speed >>> up

Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-30 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 30.03.20 07:09, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >> Have you tested with tcp/tls or with udp? There was a group of commits >> trying to propagate the tcp connection id as much as possible to speed >> up connection search, maybe that needs to be reset -- I can look into

Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-29 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > Have you tested with tcp/tls or with udp? There was a group of commits > trying to propagate the tcp connection id as much as possible to speed > up connection search, maybe that needs to be reset -- I can look into > it, if you tested for tcp/tls. This is what

Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Have you tested with tcp/tls or with udp? There was a group of commits trying to propagate the tcp connection id as much as possible to speed up connection search, maybe that needs to be reset -- I can look into it, if you tested for tcp/tls. Cheers, Daniel On 29.03.20 19:33, Juha Heinanen

Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-29 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > The branch route is executed inside t_fwd.c (like 354 in master branch). > You can try to do a diff of tm module between the branches to see if you > can spot something related. I remember I grouped some variables in a > structure at some point, but it should

Re: [SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-29 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 29.03.20 14:49, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Juha Heinanen writes: > >> I noticed that in 5.3 and master setting $du in branch route has no >> effect. It works fine in 5.2 using exactly the same config. > This is pretty serious. If someone can point to possible source code > files, where this bug

[SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-29 Thread Juha Heinanen
Juha Heinanen writes: > I noticed that in 5.3 and master setting $du in branch route has no > effect. It works fine in 5.2 using exactly the same config. This is pretty serious. If someone can point to possible source code files, where this bug might have been originated from, I can start

[SR-Users] setting $du in branch route has no effect in 5.3

2020-03-29 Thread Juha Heinanen
I noticed that in 5.3 and master setting $du in branch route has no effect. It works fine in 5.2 using exactly the same config. -- Juha ___ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org