Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route

2021-09-03 Thread Koray Vatansever
ailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in > failure route > > > > Hi, > > which version are you using? > > A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in > 5.0. > &

Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route

2017-05-12 Thread Huber Andreas
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route Hi, which version are you using? A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0. Regards, Federico On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas mailto:andreas.hu...@nagra.com

Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route

2017-05-12 Thread Federico Cabiddu
Hi, which version are you using? A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0. Regards, Federico On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Huber Andreas wrote: > Hello, > > > > We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a failure_route to > give UEs that mi

[SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route

2017-05-12 Thread Huber Andreas
Hello, We have a use case where we suspend a transaction in a failure_route to give UEs that might be woken by a push notification more time to REGISTER and join the INVITE. We'd like to drop the previous branches in this case. I tried using t_drop_replies() but it has no effect. The doc stat