Re: [SR-Users] reply when drop() in branch route

2010-04-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi Juha, On 4/17/10 8:49 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > drop in branch_route was missing, as Andreas Granig reported few days > ago. I just committed the patch, can you test again? daniel, any explanation to the error message that i get when i call drop() in

Re: [SR-Users] sr-trunk with mysql support

2010-04-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 4/17/10 11:20 PM, Meftah Tayeb wrote: hi dear all, i'm trying to use latest trunk with mysql i have down compiling kamailio now i don't know ghow do i enable mysql for kamailio (not for kamdbctl) the db is created successfully but kamailio is unable to connect to the db default user/pa

Re: [SR-Users] reply when drop() in branch route

2010-04-17 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > i had it in mind by was busy yesterday. it needed a way to filter this > case apart of adding branches errors. Can you give it a try? I committed > on master brnach, if is ok, i will cherry pick to kamailio 3.0. daniel, now the error message is gone. when

Re: [SR-Users] reply when drop() in branch route

2010-04-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 4/17/10 11:51 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > i had it in mind by was busy yesterday. it needed a way to filter this > case apart of adding branches errors. Can you give it a try? I committed > on master brnach, if is ok, i will cherry pick to kama

Re: [SR-Users] reply when drop() in branch route

2010-04-17 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > I think the codes are taken from error.h now, at least for this > particular case is E_CFG, which is -6 -- on the idea that error code was > triggered by cfg action. Andrei should confirm whether is error.h > driving the codes or not with the new tm. Howev

[SR-Users] wiki: upgrade from 3.0.x to 3.1.x

2010-04-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I started the page that should collect notes about how to upgrade from version 3.0.x to 3.1.0: http://sip-router.org/wiki/install/3.0.x-to-3.1.x 3.1.0 is not yet released, target date is September 2010, right now is the code on master branch in GIT repository. However, this page will

Re: [SR-Users] load balancing redirect

2010-04-17 Thread kaiser
it's ok. This is just an issue we found, you can do it anytime you are available. kaiser 在 2010/4/16 上午5:44 時, Iñaki Baz Castillo 寫到: > 2010/4/15 Benjamin Lawetz : >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to setup Kamailio to act as a load-balancer in front of >> asterisk servers. >> >> I want it to do the f

Re: [SR-Users] load balancing redirect

2010-04-17 Thread kaiser
it's ok. This is just an issue we found, you can do it anytime you are available. kaiser 在 2010/4/16 上午5:44 時, Iñaki Baz Castillo 寫到: > 2010/4/15 Benjamin Lawetz : >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to setup Kamailio to act as a load-balancer in front of >> asterisk servers. >> >> I want it to do the fo

Re: [SR-Users] [Kamailio-Users] Possible timing/latency related problem ?

2010-04-17 Thread Juha Heinanen
Vikram Ragukumar writes: > Why is the SDP connection parameter not being rewritten for the 180 > Ringing message alone ? > How can i ensure the SIP messages are relayed in the order they are > received ? vikram, what was the conclusion regarding this? did the problem go away when you call

Re: [SR-Users] sr-trunk with mysql support

2010-04-17 Thread Meftah Tayeb
hi daniel, thank you for the reply but how do i enable the #!define? please givee me the commanted line and the uncommented line thanks Le 17/04/2010 10:26, Daniel-Constantin Mierla a écrit : Hello, On 4/17/10 11:20 PM, Meftah Tayeb wrote: hi dear all, i'm trying to use latest trunk with mysql

Re: [SR-Users] sr-trunk with mysql support

2010-04-17 Thread Alex Balashov
#!define BLAH means that BLAH is "enabled," in the sense that #!ifdef BLAH check will succeed. > hi daniel, > thank you for the reply > but how do i enable the #!define? > please givee me the commanted line and the uncommented line > thanks > Le 17/04/2010 10:26, Daniel-Constantin Mierla a écrit

Re: [SR-Users] Re-invite problems with t.38?

2010-04-17 Thread Espen Berg
Den 15.04.2010 13:27, skrev Klaus Darilion: How would you have written it? I prefer this logic: ... if (loose_route()) { if (!has_totag()) { xlog("L_WARN","$ci loose_route request without to-tag, 403...\n"); sl_send_reply("403", "out-of-dialog loose_route not allowed"); exit; } ... loose..rou