2010/4/20 Alex Balashov :
>> Hi, yes, a workaround is adding the headers in branch_route, it works.
>> However I wonder if the expected behavior is that added headers are
>> not keep in serial forking. Well, it could make sense. I just want to
>> confirm.
>
> I too am surprised by this. It seems t
On 4/20/10 8:36 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 04/19/2010 05:15 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
event_route should be called in this case. Can you test with dlg bridge
to see if the event route is executed?
I have not had a chance to test this with dlg_bridge() yet, but it
clearly is not
please keep the mailing list cc-ed, others may benefit of this
discussion, participate with ideas or solutions.
On 4/20/10 9:18 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
Thank you for your help Daniel... I was reading the source code to
understand the parameter "connection_timeout" in the TLS module 3.0.x
ve
On 04/19/2010 05:15 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
event_route should be called in this case. Can you test with dlg bridge
to see if the event route is executed?
I have not had a chance to test this with dlg_bridge() yet, but it
clearly is not working so well with dialog timeout/BYE.
T
On 04/20/2010 12:46 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/4/20 Juha Heinanen:
lcr module does nothing to any headers, just destination set. what i
do, i add gw specific headers in branch route block separately for each
gw. if your gws share the headers, you should be able to add them in
route blo
On 4/20/10 8:29 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 4/20/10 7:30 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/4/20 Bruno Bresciani:
Hi people, this is my first time that I writing to this list and I
nedd some
help... When kamailio lost connection with a user registred over TLS
(timeout for examlp
On 4/20/10 7:30 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/4/20 Bruno Bresciani:
Hi people, this is my first time that I writing to this list and I nedd some
help... When kamailio lost connection with a user registred over TLS
(timeout for examlple), I want this user be unregister in kamailio too.
2010/4/20 Bruno Bresciani :
> Hi people, this is my first time that I writing to this list and I nedd some
> help... When kamailio lost connection with a user registred over TLS
> (timeout for examlple), I want this user be unregister in kamailio too. How
> can I make this unregister?
It's a comme
On 4/20/10 7:16 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> Does not make lot of sense in my opinion since it is very easy to do
> with substr:
>
> head: {s.substr, 0, len}
> tail: {s.substr, -len, 0}
>
> striptail requied computation of the length and use of
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> Does not make lot of sense in my opinion since it is very easy to do
> with substr:
>
> head: {s.substr, 0, len}
> tail: {s.substr, -len, 0}
>
> striptail requied computation of the length and use of that in substr,
> making it a bit too complex.
yes
Hi people, this is my first time that I writing to this list and I nedd some
help... When kamailio lost connection with a user registred over TLS
(timeout for examlple), I want this user be unregister in kamailio too. How
can I make this unregister?
Thank you...
__
2010/4/20 Iñaki Baz Castillo :
> Hi, yes, a workaround is adding the headers in branch_route, it works.
> However I wonder if the expected behavior is that added headers are
> not keep in serial forking. Well, it could make sense. I just want to
> confirm.
Issue solved!
The problem is that I was
2010/4/20 Juha Heinanen :
> lcr module does nothing to any headers, just destination set. what i
> do, i add gw specific headers in branch route block separately for each
> gw. if your gws share the headers, you should be able to add them in
> route block before starting to call next_gw()s and t_
On 4/20/10 6:30 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> should be fixed now. Let me know if works fine for you.
the same test now worked ok. i'll make more tests later.
now that you have implemented strips, how about the opposite, i.e., head
and tail?
Does not m
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> should be fixed now. Let me know if works fine for you.
the same test now worked ok. i'll make more tests later.
now that you have implemented strips, how about the opposite, i.e., head
and tail?
-- juha
___
SIP E
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
> Hi, I receive a request, append some custom headers and use
> "load_gws()" (from LCR module).
> If the first gateway fails I do "next_gw()" and this second request to
> the second gateway doesn't contain the previously appended custom
> headers.
>
> Is it the e
Hi, I receive a request, append some custom headers and use
"load_gws()" (from LCR module).
If the first gateway fails I do "next_gw()" and this second request to
the second gateway doesn't contain the previously appended custom
headers.
Is it the expected behavior?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
_
On 4/20/10 5:36 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Juha Heinanen writes:
> i got core dump. most like from this statement:
>
> $rU = $(var(unescaped_user){s.strip,4});
it turned out that in this test $var(unescaped_user) only had 4 chars,
i.e., they all got stripped. then this empty string is
Hello,
On 4/20/10 5:36 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Juha Heinanen writes:
> i got core dump. most like from this statement:
>
> $rU = $(var(unescaped_user){s.strip,4});
it turned out that in this test $var(unescaped_user) only had 4 chars,
i.e., they all got stripped. then this empty str
Juha Heinanen writes:
> i got core dump. most like from this statement:
>
> $rU = $(var(unescaped_user){s.strip,4});
it turned out that in this test $var(unescaped_user) only had 4 chars,
i.e., they all got stripped. then this empty string is supposed to be
assigned to $rU.
the test may no
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> I just committed s.strip and s.striptail transformations:
> http://sip-router.org/wiki/cookbooks/transformations/devel#sstrip_len
>
> Testing and feedback is appreciated.
daniel,
i got core dump. most like from this statement:
$rU = $(var(unescaped_user)
On 4/12/10 8:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 4/12/10 7:59 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> it supports only strings. The subst expression is pre-compiled at
startup.
>
> Some development is required to extend for what you want.
daniel,
no problem,
fyi, i just added support to execute module functions from Lua. There is
a restriction not to execute functions with fixups for parameters but no
free-fixup.
SR Lua API is documented at:
http://sip-router.org/wiki/api/lua/devel
Cheers,
Daniel
On 2/11/10 12:28 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wro
Hi Espen, can you provide the traces with proper line break?
E.g. I always use
"ngrep -W byline -t -q -P "" any-pattery port 5060"
regards
klaus
Am 17.04.2010 21:39, schrieb Espen Berg:
Den 15.04.2010 13:27, skrev Klaus Darilion:
How would you have written it?
I prefer this logic:
...
if
24 matches
Mail list logo
