Am 20.09.2010 21:21, schrieb Santiago Soares:
Hello,
We use Kamailio as a stateless load balancer.
It runs on a VM, with 512 MB RAM, and it seems to have some kind of
memory leak.
The kamailio processes consume all available memory, until Kamailio
crashes and restart.
What do you mean with "
Am 21.09.2010 17:12, schrieb Ovidiu Sas:
Hello all,
I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from
the rtpproxy (k) module.
Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used.
Why?
- force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s'
flag was depr
On 21 September 2010 23:53, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>
> On 9/22/10 12:49 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
>> On 09/21/2010 04:47 PM, dotnetdub wrote:
>>
>> I also looked at using re.subst on $pU but can't get it to work.
>>>
>>> What is the best way to achieve what I'm trying to do?
>>>
>>
>>
Ok. Thanks for the link. It also comments other helpful switch "-f" that can
help me also to make tests. :)
César Pinto (2439)
+34 91 787 23 00 alhambra-eidos.es
-Mensaje original-
De: sip.n...@gmail.com [mailto:sip.n...@gmail.com] En nombre de Ovidiu Sas
Enviado el: martes, 21 de sep
On Sep 21, 2010 at 21:09, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
> > >ERROR: reply too big
> > >
> > > how to get rid of that?
> > this seems to come from sercmd tool. Quickly grepping its sources, the
> > internal limit is 4K for rpc replies. You can try to recompile serc
the modules' readme index page was updated:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/
or
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/
If you spot some errors, let me know.
Thanks,
Daniel
On 9/21/10 6:29 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
will be fixed soon, meanwhile, the raw-from-git gene
Hi,
Siremis version 2.0 is planned to work with upcoming Kamailio or SER 3.1
and by now is alpha version.
If you want to have a preview, then you can access it at:
http://demo.asipto.com/siremis20/
username: guest
password: guest
v2.0 brings a completely new face and many features, reusing t
question: Is there a backward compatibility to at least from 1.4.3 ? :)
___
Omar
321 Communications
o...@321communications.com
Phone: 813-938-6099
Mobile: 404-345-4303
On Sep 22, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Elena-Ramona Modroiu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Siremis version 2.0 is planned to work with
Am 22.09.2010 15:31, schrieb Santiago Soares:
Thank's for the answers.
Based on your explanation, I think that the problem is an external library.
The kamailio process is taking all the system memory.
When the system runs out of memory, it kills kamailio.
But how can I find out what is the libr
On 09/22/2010 06:08 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 22.09.2010 15:31, schrieb Santiago Soares:
Thank's for the answers.
Based on your explanation, I think that the problem is an external library.
The kamailio process is taking all the system memory.
When the system runs out of memory, it kills
On 09/22/2010 06:21 PM, marius zbihlei wrote:
On 09/22/2010 06:08 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 22.09.2010 15:31, schrieb Santiago Soares:
Thank's for the answers.
Based on your explanation, I think that the problem is an external library.
The kamailio process is taking all the system
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Klaus Darilion
wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.09.2010 17:12, schrieb Ovidiu Sas:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from
>> the rtpproxy (k) module.
>> Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used.
>>
>> Why?
>>
ramona,
thank you for this new siremis branche
but, you are using captcha for login;)
so i am a blind user, how i can login now?
:P
Le 22/09/2010 16:23, Elena-Ramona Modroiu a écrit :
Hi,
Siremis version 2.0 is planned to work with upcoming Kamailio or SER
3.1 and by now is alpha version.
If
2010/9/22 Elena-Ramona Modroiu :
> If you want to have a preview, then you can access it at:
> http://demo.asipto.com/siremis20/
It looks really well :)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing lis
2010/9/22 marius zbihlei :
> this will be much better handled by a transformation
>
> if ( $(fn{s.len}) > 62 ) {...}
Yes, using pcre_math is good when we need to perform a regular
expression against a PV (which is not possible using "=~"). For
example I use it to check if the RURI username matches
Hello.
I’m wondering how the “Weight” column in the LCR ‘gw’ table Works.
I have 5 gateways defined with different weights.
gw_name grp_id ip_addr hostnameport uri_scheme
transport strip tagweightping flags
GW0258 10.0.0.71
On 9/22/10 10:25 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/9/22 marius zbihlei:
this will be much better handled by a transformation
if ( $(fn{s.len})> 62 ) {...}
Yes, using pcre_math is good when we need to perform a regular
expression against a PV (which is not possible using "=~"). For
example
2010/9/22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
>> Yes, using pcre_math is good when we need to perform a regular
>> expression against a PV (which is not possible using "=~"). For
>> example I use it to check if the RURI username matches a prefix
>> extracted from a database:
>>
>> if ! pcre_match("$rU", "
On 9/22/10 10:38 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/9/22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
Yes, using pcre_math is good when we need to perform a regular
expression against a PV (which is not possible using "=~"). For
example I use it to check if the RURI username matches a prefix
extracted from a dat
2010/9/22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
>>> if(!$rU =~ $var(re)) {
>>
>> Yes, I tryed that (hope I'm not wrong) and it also didn't do the job.
>> Perhaps it should work?
>
> I expect so, but I haven't tried with 3.x -- iirc, I added it in openser
> some time ago (or maybe I only wanted to :-) ?!?!) --
2010/9/22 Iñaki Baz Castillo :
> 2010/9/22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
if(!$rU =~ $var(re)) {
>>>
>>> Yes, I tryed that (hope I'm not wrong) and it also didn't do the job.
>>> Perhaps it should work?
>>
>> I expect so, but I haven't tried with 3.x -- iirc, I added it in openser
>> some time ago
On 9/22/10 11:33 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/9/22 Iñaki Baz Castillo:
2010/9/22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
if(!$rU =~ $var(re)) {
Yes, I tryed that (hope I'm not wrong) and it also didn't do the job.
Perhaps it should work?
I expect so, but I haven't tried with 3.x -- iirc, I added it
2010/9/22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
>> It *does* work. Not sure what I did in my previous tests but I didn't
>> get it working, so you are right :)
>
> which versions have you tried this time?
K 1.5.4.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
___
SIP Express Router (
2010/9/22 Ricardo Martinez :
> If I have 100 calls, I was expecting was to have 20 to GW05, 20 to GW06, 20
> to GW09 and 20 to GW10
>
> Finalle 10 to GW02 and 10 to GW02.
>
> Is this the correct interpretation of this parameter?
Yes, but note you need to do much more that 100 calls in order the go
24 matches
Mail list logo
