Hi,
I narrowed it down to the sanity_check.
if(!sanity_check("1511", "7"))
{
xlog("L_WARN", "sanity check - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu
T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
exit;
}
The sanity_check fails but does not send a reply back or log the above
line. I have
Hi, can anyone answer this?
Regards
Lee
From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Lee Archer
Sent: 10 November 2010 10:25
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: [SR-Users] Variable substitution with Dispatcher
Hi, I a
Hi All,
I'm still getting these errors and I'm struggling to resolve the
problem. I think I'm missing an append_branch or something simple in
my config, a little guiedance will be appriciated.
The error:
Nov 11 10:23:26 sip-router1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[23739]: ERROR: tm
[t_fwd.c:1379]: ERRO
1. One problem may be that you are calling route[RELAY] from your
failure route and using sl_send_reply(). The route[RELAY] is still
being invoked in a failure route execution context, even if you have
managed to contextually invoke another route, or subroutine if you will.
Stateless replies
On 11/11/2010 11:52 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
2. Yes. throw an append_branch() into your failure route.
To expand on this; the proxy can't just arbitrarily t_relay() again
after it has received a final negative reply. That's not what proxies
do. The only way it can happen is if a proxy use
> Hi All,
>
> I'm still getting these errors and I'm struggling to resolve the
> problem. I think I'm missing an append_branch or something simple in
> my config, a little guiedance will be appriciated.
>
> The error:
>
> Nov 11 10:23:26 sip-router1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[23739]: ERROR: tm
> [t_
On 11/11/10 7:42 PM, JR Richardson wrote:
Hi All,
I'm still getting these errors and I'm struggling to resolve the
problem. I think I'm missing an append_branch or something simple in
my config, a little guiedance will be appriciated.
The error:
Nov 11 10:23:26 sip-router1 /usr/local/sbin/k
Hello,
On 11/11/10 5:35 PM, Lee Archer wrote:
Hi, can anyone answer this?
Regards
Lee
*From:*sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On Behalf Of *Lee Archer
*Sent:* 10 November 2010 10:25
*To:* sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
*Subject:* [SR-User
Hello,
looking now again at the trace you sent first time, the ACK is:
U 2010/10/28 10:51:13.267863 178.21.248.20:5060 -> 178.21.248.7:5060
ACKsip:1...@178.21.248.56:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route:.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 178.21.248.20;branch=z9hG4bK690c.97354e4.2.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
87.104.233.108:5060;r
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/10 7:42 PM, JR Richardson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm still getting these errors and I'm struggling to resolve the
>>> problem. I think I'm missing an append_branch or something simple in
>>> my config, a littl
Hi Daniel,
The Via line is OK, it was the email formating.
I am using Kamailio 3.0.3 and the sanity docs says:
This function makes a row of sanity checks on the given request. The
function returns false (-1) if one of the checks failed. If one of the
checks fails the module sends a precise error
Hello,
On 11/11/10 11:02 PM, Morten Isaksen wrote:
Hi Daniel,
The Via line is OK, it was the email formating.
I am using Kamailio 3.0.3 and the sanity docs says:
This function makes a row of sanity checks on the given request. The
function returns false (-1) if one of the checks failed. If on
Hi All,
Asterisk>http://pastebin.com/crfMe81D
Here is a pastebin of the call graph:
http://pastebin.com/rnQZDyFU
I was thinking about including this in my failure route:
if (t_check_status("486")) {
append_branch();
t_relay();
}
Would that do any good?
Thanks.
JR
--
JR Richardson
2010/11/11 JR Richardson :
> I was thinking about including this in my failure route:
>
> if (t_check_status("486")) {
> append_branch();
> t_relay();
> }
>
> Would that do any good?
The above code instructs Kamailio to create a new branch to the same
destination upon receipt of hte 486 re
2010/11/8 hala alramli
>
> i want to instal tunnel server in kamailio .
> i want to ask if there is any opensource voip tunnel server .
> and if there is an tutorial to configure kamailio with tunnel server
What is a "tunnel server"?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
_
2010/11/2 Kosilov Fedor :
> OK, and how do you usually deal with this? I was thinking of putting the
> Q-value into the "Display Name" field, so when the device registers, I could
> get it using $fn (reference to display name of 'From' header) and put it
> directly to the location table in the data
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/11/11 JR Richardson :
>> I was thinking about including this in my failure route:
>>
>> if (t_check_status("486")) {
>> append_branch();
>> t_relay();
>> }
>>
>> Would that do any good?
>
> The above code instructs Kamailio
On 11/11/2010 09:17 PM, JR Richardson wrote:
So the append_branch should not be used, ok, what about just the
t_relay and exit?
if (t_check_status("486")) {
t_relay();
exit;
}
Would this work?
This is a failure route, a special type of reply route. Replies are
automatically passed
18 matches
Mail list logo
