Hi,
Thanks. I've already been sniffing the network. The capture file of the
presence server (kamailio) and the ua (watcher) is attached.
Backend subscriptions must be sent to what CSCF of the presentity
domain? The S-CSCF? You wrote me that Kamailio uses dns queries in order
to determine th
Thanks Alex,
it looks like we'll have to move to mysql in that case (we are much more
experienced in postgres). Is this feature expected to be added for
db_postgres?
Regards
Javi
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:54:20 -0500
> From: Alex Balashov
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Reconnection
Kamailio has relatively little to do with the matter of faxing per se;
it would only be involved in routing the SIP messages. Your other
questions do not pertain to Kamailio.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-95
Hello,
On 1/4/11 6:47 PM, Watkins, Bradley wrote:
-Original Message-
From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Olle E. Johansson
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12:24 PM
To: kamailio SR-Users
Subject: [SR-Users] Support for vi
Hey guys
Here is what I typically do in a scenario like this:
SIPp instance no 1 (port x): handles registrations but will register
with NOT with port X but with port Y.
SIPp instance no 2 (port y): handles the "other" traffic, such as
INVITE, MESSAGE whatever.
The reason for this is that when I
I was trying to use fax with kamailio / asterisk setup and sipce if
possible. In asterisk we had to enable udptl for faxing to work. But i
couldnot figure out where to start with for faxing in kamailio /asterisk
or sipce. Could someone guide me to the right direction please ?
Thank you
Amit
_
>-Original Message-
>From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
>[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
>Olle E. Johansson
>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12:24 PM
>To: kamailio SR-Users
>Subject: [SR-Users] Support for via ;maddr
>
>Friends,
>We've had an interest
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 18:24 +0100, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> Friends,
> We've had an interesting discussion on the Asterisk-dev mailing list about
> supporting the ;maddr and ;ttl attributes in the via header when sending
> responses. We've agreed that it should be considered harmful and suggest
Friends,
We've had an interesting discussion on the Asterisk-dev mailing list about
supporting the ;maddr and ;ttl attributes in the via header when sending
responses. We've agreed that it should be considered harmful and suggest making
it configurable whether to support it in Asterisk.
My ques
On 01/04/2011 09:46 AM, Javier Gallart wrote:
Hi list
we have been testing the mtree module. We do periodical reloads of the
mtree table with the "mi mt_reload" command through xmlrpc. It works
fine except when the db is restarted. If we manually restart the db and
then try the mt_reload command
Hi all,
The $avp(dsattrs) it works fine. It was a misconfiguration.
Does anyone knows if is possible to retrieve from Dispatcher the description
field from each GW and add that to an avp pair?
Thanks
Alex
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:13 PM, alex pappas wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm trying with
Hi list
we have been testing the mtree module. We do periodical reloads of the mtree
table with the "mi mt_reload" command through xmlrpc. It works fine except
when the db is restarted. If we manually restart the db and then try the
mt_reload commands we get this error:
Jan 4 09:13:17 server /usr
Am 04.01.2011 08:59, schrieb Stephen McVarnock:
2) I tried to REGISTER the SIPP endpoint in a single xml scenario file
with kamailio. This works as per usual. I then killed
the SIPP instance and ran a new SIPP script listening on the same port
before trying to send the INVITE to it. I expected
Am 04.01.2011 13:06, schrieb "Andrés S. García Ruiz":
Hello,
Thanks for your responses and happy new year!
Could anyone tell me how to make the RLS module work properly?
I've tried several different solutions, but I still don't know what's
the expected behaviour of the RLS.
I'm using the K
I would, except it seems I can't register with the tracker. My (rather
strict) email service provider refuses the registration confirmation
message:
Jan 3 14:10:30 ralf postfix/smtpd[26508]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
rimmer.ryngle.com[78.46.84.71]: 504 5.5.2 : Helo command rejected:
need fully-q
Hi,
I think, the NAT pin-hole is closed. Normally, kamailio does detect NAT and
therefore does send small network pakets, that the firewall would not close the
port. If you use sipp and kill it to use a new configuration the NAT port was
closed already.
Best regards,
Bernhard
-Ursprüngli
Hi,
I have got the second scenario here to work i.e. REGISTER xml ran,
kill sipp, run sipp with INVITE xml.
There seems to be timing issue associated with this though - if I leave
to long a delay between killing REGISTER xml
and running INVITE xml then the INVITE will not be received by the s
17 matches
Mail list logo
